| Author | Message | | Alpha | | Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:02 am Post subject: Britain opposes 'JINSA John' Bolton at the UN |
| http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/11/27/wbolton27.xml&sSheet=/portal/2005/11/27/ixportal.html
http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/
Britain opposes Bolton tactic on UN reform
By Philip Sherwell in Washington
(Filed: 27/11/2005)
Britain has rejected a proposal by John Bolton, America's combative ambassador to the United Nations, to block the upcoming UN budget as a tactic to push throughdisputed reforms.
The rare public disagreement between the two close allies comes as the showdown over reforms at the UN's New York headquarters becomes increasingly acrimonious.
John Bolton: Angered
Britain has rebuffed a Bolton move to join him in refusing to pass the organisation's 2006 budget until member states approve wide-ranging management reforms.
To the irritation of Mr Bolton, many developing nations are bitterly opposed to changes that they claim are driven by American political pressure. He suggested last week that talks on the 2006 and 2007 budgets could be postponed as a means to overcome the trenchant resistance from the "G77" bloc of developing countries. He also threatened that the United States could seek an alternative to the UN for solving international problems in future.
Britain strongly supports the reform package, but along with the other 24 EU states it has ruled out a budget delay. "We are not in favour of holding any individual items or the budget hostage to other issues but we do say very clearly that by the end of this year we need clarity and a determination to tackle a better management for the United Nations," said the British ambassador Emyr Jones Parry.
Kofi Annan, the UN secretary general, said that any delay in approving next year's budget would create a "serious financial crisis". Mr Bolton says a temporary budget could be passed to ensure UN operations did not grind to a halt.
The reform proposals are intended to improve the efficiency and running of the UN bureaucracy by handing the secretary general's office greater power to oversee management, finance and staffing. These responsibilities are currently the remit of the unwieldly 191-state General Assembly, where developing nations fear losing their influence.
The changes - agreed at the UN World Summit in September following a damning report into the oil-for-food scandal - are already a watered-down version of what America and the EU had hoped for.
The stand-off is also frustrating Mr Annan, who is desperate to introduce reforms before he leaves office next year in an attempt to improve a reputation badly tarnished by the scandal.
"We have to get past this political dogfight. We just hope that both sides can sober up and reach some agreement on this," Mark Malloch Brown, Mr Annan's British chief of staff, told the Sunday Telegraph. "The UN needs a first-class international public administration capable of meeting its challenges and we don't have that right now."
Western diplomats hope that there may be progress before the end of the year on limited changes such as new ethics committee and overhauling the discredited human rights commission. But they are braced for "trench warfare" on management reforms.
"The hostility and conflict in the debate about reforms illustrate the many fault lines in the organisation," said a senior Western envoy. "It is going to be a long hard slog."
Mr Bolton, a long-time and vocal UN critic, arrived in New York four months ago with a reputation as an uncompromising tough talker. Privately, British diplomats express surprise that he has not made greater efforts to cultivate them or build alliances. "You're either with him or against him," said one.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JINSA ZIONIST OPERATIVE JOHN BOLTON JUST NAMED AS US AMBASSADOR:
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/wake-up-america-your-government-is-hijacked-by-zionism/2005/03/07/jinsa-israel-firster-john-bolton-named-as-us-ambassador.php
JINSA Israel firsters: 'IRAQ DOWN, IRAN LEFT TO GO'
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/wake-up-america-your-government-is-hijacked-by-zionism/2005/04/06/jinsa-israel-firsters-iraq-down-iran-left-to-go.php | |  | | Alpha | | Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 8:20 pm Post subject: 'JINSA John' Bolton working 'like a Trojan' for Israel.. |
| 'JINSA John' Bolton working 'like a Trojan' for Israel..
http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000080&sid=aMtyi.vxeA5Q#
Bolton Says Palestinian Resolutions Demonstrate UN Irrelevance
Dec. 1 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. Ambassador John Bolton said the United Nations General Assembly demonstrated its irrelevance today by adopting six resolutions on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, including non-binding calls for Israel to withdraw from the West Bank and Golan Heights.
The General Assembly, consisting of all 191 member governments, passed resolutions very similar to measures introduced annually by Arab nations for at least 30 years. The U.S. was joined by no more than seven other nations in rejecting the resolutions, which won up to 160 votes.
``These resolutions are purely symbolic,'' Bolton told reporters at the UN. ``It is one reason why many people say the UN is not really useful in solving actual problems. We have been making enormous progress toward solutions in the Arab-Israeli conflict, and that progress has benefited from UN participation, but it does not benefit from needless repetition of meaningless resolutions in the General Assembly.''
Bolton, who has pressed UN member governments to reduce the number of General Assembly resolutions, said it was up to them to ``decide they want to do things that are relevant.''
Shielding Israel
Palestinian Ambassador Riyad Mansour said the resolutions haven't made a difference in the Middle East conflict because ``a very powerful country is shielding Israel from living up to its obligations under the UN charter.''
Arab governments complain that the U.S. protects the Jewish state in the Security Council by blocking what would be binding resolutions against Israel. The U.S. has vetoed six resolutions on the Middle East since 2000.
Mansour said the General Assembly measures are more than symbolic because they deal with what the Palestinians consider Israel's violations of international law. ``If the UN is not in the business of upholding international law, we want to know what kind of business it is involved in,'' Mansour said.
The resolutions refer to Israel's ``illegal settlement activities,'' demand that Israel cease construction of its barrier of walls and fences around the West Bank, and say Israel has violated Security Council resolutions on the questions.
Israeli Ambassador Dan Gillerman said the Palestinians had ``hijacked'' the anniversary of the UN's partition of Palestine, creating Israel on Nov. 29, 1947.
``It is very disappointing that the very positive changes in the region, such as Israel's withdrawal from Gaza, seem to have absolutely no effect on this ongoing tedious ritual,'' Gillerman said. ``Taking this day year after year and repeating this sorry ritual is rather pathetic. It shows that as far as the Palestinians are concerned, there is no present or future, only the past happening over and over again.''
To contact the reporter on this story:
Bill Varner in United Nations at wvarner@bloomberg.net.
Last Updated: December 1, 2005 12:49 EST | | | | Alpha | | Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 5:48 am Post subject: Israel's Man at the UN |
| Israel's Man at the UN
Tom Barry, IRC | July 26, 2006
International Relations Center www.irc-online.org
John Bolton has proved to be the right man for the job. As UN ambassador, Bolton has clearly and consistently projected the White House's Middle East policies, especially the administration's unwavering support for Israel.
As international criticism of Israel mounts, President Bush has asked Congress to approve his renomination of Bolton—a longtime State Department diplomat who has over three decades sought to debilitate the United Nations and who has earned a reputation as a defender of an aggressive Israel. The Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) calls Bolton "one of Israel's truest friends in the world."
Last summer the Senate rejected the nomination of Bolton, a right-wing ideologue fiercely opposed to all international laws and institutions that constrain U.S. power. Overriding congressional concerns that Bolton would be an ineffective UN ambassador because of his long history of criticizing the United Nations, Bush appointed Bolton to the post during the August 2005 congressional recess.
A year into his term, which expires in January 2007, Bolton has energized his supporters, won over some critics, and pleased the president with his own brand of cowboy diplomacy. With congressional support running high for Israel's war against Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in the Palestinian territory of Gaza, the White House has resubmitted Bolton's nomination.
Bolton received strong support from major Jewish organizations during last year's confirmation hearings, and these same organizations are gearing up to mount a strong pro-Bolton lobbying campaign this time around. Among the Jewish groups that supported Bolton during the first hearings were the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), B'nai B'rith International, the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, and the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA).
In midst of the confirmation fight, Tom Casey, director of the State Department's press office, said: "I don't think you'll find anyone in this administration who is a stronger friend of Israel." Weighing in on the Bolton nomination, an AIPAC spokesperson noted that "John Bolton has stood for a strong U.S.-Israel relationship."
Since he began his government career as a Reagan administration official in the early 1980s, Bolton has been an outspoken, dedicated proponent of close U.S.-Israel ties. During the George H.W. Bush administration (1989-93), Bolton earned hero status among pro-Israel groups and the Jewish community in general for masterminding the State Department's successful effort to repeal UN resolution 3379 (passed in 1975), which stated that "Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination."
Bolton himself does not publicly define himself as a Zionist. However, he has closely associated himself with both Christian and Jewish Zionists. Bolton worked closely with Senator Jesse Helms, a fundamentalist with Christian Zionist convictions. In early 2001 Helms told a gathering at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI): "John Bolton is the kind of man with whom I would want to stand at Armageddon, if it should be my lot to be on hand for what is forecast to be the final battle between good and evil in the world."
Bolton is a longtime member of the advisory board of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, which has offices in Washington and Jerusalem. JINSA describes itself as "the most influential group on the issue of U.S.-Israel military relations." With an overarching focus on "U.S.-Israeli strategic cooperation," JINSA says it "communicates with the Jewish Community and the national security establishment on behalf of the role Israel can and does play in bolstering American interests, as well as the link between American defense policy and the security of Israel." 1
JINSA called President Bush a "courageous leader" for having appointed "a courageous man" to represent the United States at the United Nations. Congratulating the president for his bold move in sending Bolton to the UN despite congressional opposition, JINSA executive director Tom Neumann said: "John Bolton is a strong advocate of America and a strong supporter of Israel. With the consistent effort to undermine American and Israeli security in the UN, I feel confident that a proven diplomat like John Bolton will be representing our interests in the UN." 2
Bolton's institutional affiliations extend to an array of right-wing and pro-Israel policy institutes and think tanks, including the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), American Enterprise Institute, Manhattan Institute, National Policy Forum, and Committee for Peace and Security in the Gulf. Bolton served on PNAC's board of directors in the late 1990s, and signed numerous of its public statements and letters, including its 1997 founding statement of principles. Before joining the Bush administration in 2001, Bolton was senior vice president for policy at AEI, a neoconservative think tank that has since the 1970s been a leading proponent in Washington of right-wing Zionist positions. 3 Bolton has also been a longtime activist with the right-wing Federalist Society.
Defender of Israel Award
During his first confirmation hearings, Bolton's record as undersecretary of state for arms control came under fire. According to news reports, including the highly respected Jewish magazine Forward, Bolton took part in unauthorized meetings with Israeli officials, including Israeli intelligence agents. He met with officials of the Mossad intelligence agency without first seeking "country clearance" from the State Department's Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs. In its May 6, 2005 article on Bolton's practice of manipulating intelligence and violating government protocol, Forward also noted that Bolton is "known as a strong supporter of Israel's position that Tehran is coming alarmingly close to being able to weaponize its nuclear material." 4
U.S. News reported that in his position as the government's top arms control official Bolton shelved a memo suggesting that Israel had violated U.S. laws against using U.S. arms for "nondefensive" purposes when it used U.S.-supplied weapons to assassinate Salah Shehada, a top Hamas activist in Gaza City, on July 23, 2000. Israel's air force used a U.S.-made F-16 bomber to drop a one-ton bomb on a house in the densely populated part of Gaza where the Hamas leader was staying. Fourteen civilians died along with Shehada, and more than 100 Palestinians were injured. Senate staffers investigating Bolton found that Bolton prevented a State Department memo accusing Israel of violating U.S. arms-export laws from reaching the desk of then-Secretary of State Colin Powell. 5
In December 2005 the Zionist Organization of America honored Bolton with its annual Defender of Israel Award. Presenting the award, ZOA president Morton Klein said: "The ZOA praises and strongly supports the heroic efforts of Ambassador Bolton to bring about fair treatment of Israel and decent conduct within the United Nations." Referring to his recent work as UN ambassador on behalf of Israel, Klein noted that Bolton's "efforts to have Hezbollah condemned at last for its vicious terrorist assaults on Israel, without the usual 'balancing' criticism of Israel for legitimately striking back at Hezbollah, is a major achievement and speaks volumes for his commitment to justice, the war on Islamic terrorism, and fair dealing for Israel and the world." 6
Speaking at the ZOA annual banquet, Bolton said a "deep-seated anti-Israel feeling" pervades the United Nations. Greeted with wild applause, Bolton reminded the audience that despite the repeal of the Zionism is racism resolution, "Anti-American, anti-Israel, anti-Zionist, anti-Semitic feelings still persist at the United Nations."
Over the past year Bolton has led the administration's rhetorical attack on Iran. In a March 8, 2006 speech at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, Bolton threatened Iran with "painful consequences" if it didn't accede to Washington's demands that it shut down all its nuclear programs.
In early July Bolton spearheaded opposition to the proposed Security Council resolution that would have called for Israel to end its attacks and its "disproportionate use of force" in the Gaza Strip. The blocked resolution would have also called for the release of a kidnapped Israeli soldier. The resolution received ten votes, with four abstentions and with Bolton casting the lone opposition vote. In October 2004, Bolton also wielded the U.S. veto to block a similar draft calling for Israel to end all military operations in northern Gaza.
On July 15 Bolton also blocked Security Council consideration of a ceasefire resolution in the Israeli-Hezbollah conflict. In an interview with Fox News, Bolton commented on the U.S. position backing Israel in the expanding war. "What our job is in New York is to make sure that that right of self-defense is not abridged arbitrarily," said Bolton. "But also, to try and do what we can to help the Lebanese government, which was elected democratically, and to see if we can help remove the cancer [referring to the Hezbollah guerrillas]." 7
Like the White House, Bolton characterizes Israel's campaigns in the Gaza Strip and in Lebanon as part of the global war on terrorism. Rejecting the rising calls for a ceasefire and rejecting criticism of Israel's bombing of Lebanon, Bolton said that there is "no moral equivalence" between Lebanese civilian casualties of Israeli bombing and Israelis killed by "malicious terrorist acts."
Republicans Will Stand Behind Bolton, Using War as a Cover
The White House announced this week that it would seek an early confirmation of Bolton. White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said there was a desire to move to a Senate vote because "people have seen the fruits of John Bolton's labor at the United Nations," and said he was "doing a tremendous job."
Citizens for Global Solutions, a group that mounted a national campaign to derail the Bolton nomination in 2005, strongly opposes Bolton's renomination, stating that Bolton "will not only fail to restore the legacy of our nation's 60-year relationship with the UN but will undermine it further." The nongovernmental organization points to a recent Washington Post op-ed by Sen. George Voinovich (R-OH) as a clear sign that the administration is preparing a partisan drive to confirm Bolton. "Partisanship will trump the need for a substantive policy discussion," the group predicted.
Senator Voinovich proved a key figure in turning back the nomination the first time around. But in his Washington Post op-ed, Voinovich wrote that he was impressed by how Bolton, whom he had previously accused of "go it alone" tendencies, has frequently invoked "my instructions" from Washington in his role as the country's representative to the UN.
Preparing the ground for what the administration hopes will be a quick confirmation hearing, Senator Voinovich said, "I cannot imagine a worse message to send to the terrorists—and to other nations deciding whether to engage in this effort—than to drag out a possible renomination process or even replace the person our president has entrusted to lead our nation at the United Nations at a time when we are working on these historic objectives."
"I do not believe the United States, at this dangerous time, can afford to have a UN ambassador who does not have Congress's full support," concluded Voinovich. 8
Bolton certainly can count on deep support from the pro-Israel Jewish organizations. Jay Zeidman, the White House liaison to the Jewish community, is mobilizing Jewish support in the upcoming drive to push Bolton's confirmation through the Senate. Working out of the White House's Office of Public Liaison, Zeidman has put out a call for Jewish support for the Bolton renomination. The 24-year old Zeidman is the son of Fred Zeidman, who serves on JINSA's board of directors and is vice-chair of the Republican Jewish Coalition. 9
Echoing the arguments of the White House and Senator Voinovich, Jewish leaders are quickly lining up behind Bolton. "Given the fact that we face a world today where every decision every day seems to count, we cannot allow any disruption in who plays the lead role in representing the United States," the chairman of the American Jewish Congress, Jack Rosen, said. "This is not a time for a void. It is not a time to take away someone who's represented us well at the United Nations, putting aside for the moment any squabbles or disagreements with the administration." 10
Citizens for Global Solutions and other opponents of the Bolton renomination, including Democratic members of the Foreign Relations Committee, are turning the pro-Bolton arguments on their head. They warn, as Voinovich did in his Washington Post op-ed, that in these dangerous times the United States cannot afford to have a UN ambassador that does not have full congressional support—which Bolton certainly doesn't have.
Tom Barry is policy director of the International Relations Center, online at wwww.irc-online.org.
Sources
"Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs," Right Web Profile, International Relations Center, http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/1508.
"JINSA Congratulates the President," JINSA, July 31, 2005, http://www.jinsa.org/articles/articles.html/function/view/categoryid/963/documentid/3090/history/3,2359,2167,963,3090.
"John Bolton," Right Web Profile, International Relations Center, http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/972.
"Senate Probes Bolton's Pro-Israel Efforts," Forward, May 6, 2005, http://www.forward.com/articles/3133.
"Foggy Bottom's Case of the Missing Memo," U.S. News & World Report, May 9, 2005, http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/050509/9whitehouse.htm.
http://www.zoa.org/2005/12/zoa_praises_us_1.htm
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,204904,00.html
Sen. George Voinovich, "Why I'll Vote for Bolton," Washington Post, July 20, 2006, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/19/AR2006071901788.html.
Steve Clemmons, "White House Calls for Jewish Groups to Line Up Behind John Bolton," The Washington Note, July 21, 2006, http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/.
Russell Berman, "Schumer and Clinton Pressed to Reappoint Bolton," New York Sun, July 26, 2006, http://oasis.nysun.com/oasis/oasisc.php?s=49&c=32. | | | | Alpha | | Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:11 am Post subject: |
| http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/pentagon__infiltrated_.html
ISRAEL LOBBY SAYS PENTAGON ‘INFILTRATED’
HOSTILITY TO ZIONISM SEEN AS ‘MAJOR THREAT’
By Michael Collins Piper
Aleading voice of the pro-Israel lobby is pushing for an old-style “witchhunt”—under the guise of “homeland security”—to identify (and expel) individuals in the U.S. government and our military who are suspected of being hostile to Israel.
The call for a witch-hunt is based on the outlandish thesis that “Islamo-fascists” and Muslim “jihadist” operatives and, perhaps more particularly, their “sympathizers”—however loosely defined—have infested America’s defense, national security and federal law enforcement community.
The witch-hunt was proposed in the fall 2006 issue of the small-circulation—but highly influential—Journal of International Security Affairs published by the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA). JINSA has been one of the frontline forces in the fanatically pro-Israel “neo-conservative” circles directing foreign policy under George W. Bush.
Not only Vice President Dick Cheney, but also UN Ambassador John Bolton, former Deputy Under Secretary of Defense Douglas Feith and Richard Perle, former chairman of the Defense Policy Board—to name just a few big Bush administration names—have all been associates of JINSA.
University of Pennsylvania Prof. Edward Herman has described JINSA as “organized and [run] by individuals closely tied to the Israeli lobby and can be regarded as a virtual agency of the Israeli government.”
What first appears as commentary in JINSA’s Journal often leads to very real policies carried out by the Bush administration alone and sometimes in concert with Capitol Hill which some critics have been known to cynically call “Israeli occupied territory.”
The JINSA call for a witch-hunt came in the context of a series of commentaries on “21st Century Allies . . . and Adversaries” for the United States and Israel, which two nations, of course, are seen in the JINSA world view as virtual extensions of one another.
Zionist publications regularly assert that “anti-Israel” sentiments must automatically be seen as “anti-American” and even as “anti-Christian” in nature, a theme first loudly propagated by the American Jewish Committee’s Commentary magazine.
The commentaries, not surprisingly, named such countries as Iran, Syria, Russia and Venezuela, as possible “adversaries” for the U.S.-Israel Axis. However, it was an article by Walid Phares—who is associated with a Zionist lobby front known as the Foundation for the Defense of the Democracies—which made the suggestion that there are very real “adversaries” on American soil, at high levels in the American military and intelligence establishment. In his article “Future Terrorism—Mutant Jihads,” Phares asked:
“How deeply have jihadist elements infiltrated the U.S. government and federal agencies, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Defense, and various military commands, either through sympathizers or via actual operatives?”
Although posed as a loaded question, Phares’s implication was clear: he believes such a “threat” exists. The JINSA writer then proclaimed the need for a “national consensus” that requires “confronting these forces” based on “knowledge of their ideologies, objectives and determination.”
Since there are few Muslim Americans or even Arab Americans in any substantial numbers in the FBI, Homeland Security, the Department of Defense, etc, the suggestion that “jihadist” elements have “infiltrated” our government might seem silly to the average American.
But in the fevered minds of JINSA and hard-line Zionist elements, the real concern is that there are growing numbers of people high up in the FBI and the CIA and in the military who are getting “fed up” with Zionist power in America. Top military leaders openly dismissed the need for war against Iraq and Iran, both wars of which have been long-time policy plans of the Zionist lobby. And all of this, in the view of the JINSA sphere, constitutes effective collaboration with and sympathy for the dreaded “jihadists.”
For example, on May 11, 2005, the New York-based Forward, a leading Jewish community newspaper, reported that Barry Jacobs of the Washington office of the American Jewish Committee said he believed there are high-ranking officials inside the U.S. intelligence community who are hostile to Israel and are waging war against pro-Israel lobbyists and their neo-conservative allies in the inner circles of the Bush administration.
Citing the ongoing FBI investigation of espionage by officials of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the leading pro-Israel lobby group, Forward reported that Jacobs believes, in Forward’s summary, that “the notion that American Jews and Pentagon neo-conservatives conspired to push the United States into war against Iraq, and possibly also against Iran, is pervasive in Washington’s intelligence community.”
Obviously, with such thoughts running rampant in pro-Israel circles, it is inevitable a leading pro-Israel policy group such as JINSA would raise the specter of “infiltration” by those who are seen as “sympathizers” and suggest that they be purged from their positions in government agencies.
So the threat of a witch-hunt happening is real. Despite differences between the Bush administration and its Democratic foes, both come together in one realm: satisfying the Israeli lobby which funds both Democrats and Republicans alike through a network of political action committees and exercising its clout on Capitol Hill through pressure groups such as the APIAC, the American Jewish Committee, the American Jewish Congress and the Anti-Defamation League.
It is ironic that JINSA should be the source of a demand for an investigation of foreign agents and sympathizers inside the American government. The founder of JINSA, Stephen Bryen, a former Senate aide on Capitol Hill, faced certain indictment on charges of espionage for Israel until pressure on the Justice Department forced Justice to back off.
Not only Bryen, but several others in the JINSA sphere were under FBI investigation on similar charges relating to their possible misuse of American defense and intelligence information on Israel’s behalf. They include:
• Richard Perle, investigated in the 1970s when he was a top aide to then-Sen. Henry Jackson;
• Douglas Feith, who—although later promoted to a high post in the Bush administration in 2001—was fired from the National Security Council of President Ronald Reagan; and
• Paul Wolfowitz, now head of the World Bank and former deputy secretary of defense in the Bush administration, investigated in the 1970s by the FBI on suspicion of passing classified information to Israel.
(Issue #47, November 20, 2006)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JINSA Israel firsters: 'IRAQ DONE, IRAN LEFT TO GO':
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/wake-up-america-your-government-is-hijacked-by-zionism/2005/04/06/jinsa-israel-firsters-iraq-down-iran-left-to-go.php
Neoconservatism as a Jewish Movement:
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/wake-up-america-your-government-is-hijacked-by-zionism/2005/04/06/neoconservatism-as-a-jewish-movement.php | | | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |
