| Author | Message | | Alpha | | Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2005 5:22 pm Post subject: 'Iraq War Conceived in Israel' author on Current Issues TV |
| Subject: Interview Tomorrow with Tillawi
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:59:53 -0500
http://www.currentissues.tv/
This Thursday November 10, 2005, Dr. Hesham Tillawi will interview Stephen Sniegoski Author of "War on Iraq - Conceived In Israel" (link to articles) : http://www.currentconcerns.ch/archive/20030102.php
Dr Stephen J Sniegoski, Ph.D., holds his doctorate in American history from the University of Maryland, with a specialty in American diplomatic history. He is the author of numerous articles dealing with World War II, the war on Iraq, and political philosophy that have appeared in such publications as Telos, The World and I, Modern Age, Current Concerns, The Occidental Quarterly, and The Last Ditch.
"Is there any evidence that Israel and her supporters have managed to get the United States to fight for their interests?"
"To unearth the real motives for the projected war on Iraq, one must ask the critical question: How did the 9/11 terrorist attack lead to the planned war on Iraq, even though there is no real evidence that Iraq was involved in 9/11? From the time of the 9/11 attack, neoconservatives, of primarily (though not exclusively) Jewish ethnicity and right-wing Zionist persuasion, have tried to make use of 9/11 to foment a broad war against Islamic terrorism, the targets of which would coincide with the enemies of Israel."
In the second hour Dr Tillawi will interview one of America’s greatest patriots, former United States Senator, the Honorable James Abourezk [SD]
A maverick who questioned the political status quo and the first Arab-American to serve in the Senate, James Abourezk was one of the few people with the foresight to condemn George Bush’s neo-conservative inspired War in Iraq from the beginning, long before it became fashionable in contemporary liberal circles. Abourezk predicted the obvious – Bush’s War in Iraq would fail and only increase world terrorism, not suppress it. The Mainstream Media doesn’t want you to know about Abourezk or to remember that he said BEFORE the invasion:
1 - Moves toward an attack on Iraq [were/are] motivated by Israel.
2 - "If America launched an attack on somebody without any provocation and declaration of war, then it will lose its moral standards," [Abu Ghraib - Gitmo]
3 - "Bush, pushed by Israel, is trying to build a case against Iraq without evidence." [I would ad that this is being done right now against Iran as well]
So join us Thursday night, November 10, 2005, between 8 PM and 10 PM to hear the uncomfortable truth behind the invasion of Iraq and hear it from a former United States Senator
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Senate Asks Pentagon to Probe Feith Role on Iraq:
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/wake-up-america-your-government-is-hijacked-by-zionism/2005/11/10/senate-asks-pentagon-to-probe-feith-role-on-iraq.php
Last edited by Alpha on Sun Nov 13, 2005 8:38 pm; edited 1 time in total | |  | | Alpha | | Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2005 11:12 pm Post subject: Senate Asks Pentagon to Probe Feith Role on Iraq |
| US Support of Israel Primary Motivation for US Terror Problem:
http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2005/08/gorilla-in-room-is-us-support-for.html
One can see a picture of this JINSA (Jewish) Neocon (Israel first) traitor to America at the top of www.nowarforisrael.com as one can look up Feith in the index of James Bamford's 'A Pretext for War' book as well :
Senate Asks Pentagon to Probe Feith Role on Iraq
Reuters
Tuesday 08 November 2005
Washington - The Pentagon's inspector general has been asked to investigate the prewar intelligence role of a planning office headed by former US defense policy chief Douglas Feith, a main architect of the Iraq war, officials said on Tuesday.
The request was made by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in a letter sent in August.
It said the Defense Department should determine whether Feith and his Office of Special Plans wielded excessive influence over intelligence that claimed Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction.
The threat of such weapons, which have never been found in Iraq, was cited as a main justification for President George W. Bush's decision to go to war in Iraq in 2003.
A Defense Department spokesman said it had not yet decided whether to undertake the investigation.
Democrats have put pressure on the Republicans who control Congress to speed up an investigation of whether the Bush administration twisted or misused intelligence in the run-up to the war, which was strongly supported by several top Pentagon officials including Feith.
Sen. Pat Roberts of Kansas, Republican chairman of the Senate intelligence committee, asked the Pentagon's inspector general to look into the activities of Feith's office after officials stopped cooperating with a Senate probe of prewar intelligence on Iraq.
Republicans blame the slackening in Pentagon cooperation on public suggestions by Democrats that Feith's office could be guilty of illegal activities.
"This is in response to problems we had getting them to testify. To get a good look at the situation, asked the IG to look into it," Roberts spokeswoman Sarah Ross Little said.
However, Democrats on the committee including the vice chairman, Sen. John Rockefeller of West Virginia, opposed Roberts' action and warned the move could delay the Senate investigation of Feith's office by up to a year.
Scathing Report
The Senate committee, which produced a scathing report on US prewar intelligence in July 2004, is due to examine the Office of Special Plans as part of a second-phase probe into how Bush administration officials used intelligence on Iraq while making their case for war.
"In no way does the vice chairman believe the IG's investigation should be a substitute for the committee's work. The committee agreed to look at this and it needs to fulfill its commitment," said Rockefeller spokeswoman Wendy Morigi.
She said Rockefeller was not aware of Roberts' request to the inspector general until after the letter had been sent.
Feith was not available for comment.
Defense Department spokesman Bryan Whitman said the inspector general's office had not decided whether to proceed with the Senate's request.
"My understanding is that they have a request from (Capitol) Hill to look at this, but that the IG's office is still evaluating that request," Whitman said in an e-mail responding to queries from Reuters.
Critics including Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan, ranking Democrat on the Senate Committee on Armed Services and a leading member of the intelligence panel, have accused Feith of using the Office of Special Plans to manipulate information to support the 2003 US-led invasion.
Some lawmakers also believe Feith bypassed the CIA to provide uncorroborated intelligence directly to the White House, including information from Ahmad Chalabi, the discredited Iraqi politician and former exile leader who is visiting Washington this week.
Feith, who left the Pentagon earlier this year, has also been blamed for overseeing what is widely considered to have been inadequate postwar planning in Iraq, which is now gripped by a bloody insurgency.
------- | | | | Alpha | | | | Alpha | | Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 9:37 am Post subject: The Final Days of the PNAC Cabal |
| Iraq War Conceived in Israel:
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2003/02/10/the-war-on-iraq-conceived-in-israel.php
The invasion/occupation of Iraq was brought on by the Jewish supremacist (JINSA/CSP/PNAC) Neocons some of whom are shown at the www.nowarforisrael.com as 'Rabbi' Cowboy blows his Zionist smoke screen yet again.. Just look at who the architects of the Iraq invasion were.. Full blown Jewish supremacist Israel firsters like Perle, Feith, Wolfowitz, Wurmser, Libby, etc via Cheney's office and the Pentagon (be sure to look up these Israel first traitors to America in the index of James Bamford's 'A Pretext for War' book as page 403 of the recently released paperback version conveys that JINSA Jewish supremacist Doug Feith had Israeli generals walk to his office at the Pentagon like they owned the place). How much coverage has there been about the AIPAC/Israel espionage.. Hardly any... If that were an Arab espionage ring, it would have been 24/7 in the Zionist controlled/influenced US press/media...
http://nomorewarforisrael.blogspot.com
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Dec05/Lee1202.htm
Neocons 'R' Bushed
The Final Days of the PNAC Cabal
by Ingmar Lee
www.dissidentvoice.org
December 2, 2005
On November 30, an exhausted looking George Bush, "Commander-in Chief," strutted up to the faux-riveted, banner-emblazoned and Hitleresque war-stump and dictated his latest "Plan for Victory" in Iraq. Apparently, the crotch-strapped President's famous "Mission Accomplished" victory declaration was a little premature because the slaughtering work of spreading freedom in Iraq will not end on his watch without "complete victory." So Bush was back before his favorite audience, this time a fawning full-house of sworn-allegiance, duty-bound, invite-only Naval Academy midshipmen, to explain to the increasingly disgruntled “Land of the Free” how he intends to prosecute his on-going atrocity in Iraq.
In all of America, Bush could not have chosen a less critical, more muzzled and gullible crowd to peddle his pullout from the quagmire. No embarrassing outbursts from this plebeian crowd, only rapturous ovation on every cue. Nevertheless, Bush stumbled immediately by pointing out the military record of his Neocon crony, Rubberstamp Rumsfeld, who was sitting in the audience. This only emphasized to everyone the chickenhawk President's own sorry AWOL military desertion and his "VEEP-for-torture's" five deferments. The cowardly hypocrisy of it all hung in the mind's eye for the duration of the oration. One wonders what went through the minds of the midshipmen, whose "Honor Concept" code of ethics states that "Midshipmen are persons of integrity: who stand for that which is right. They tell the truth and ensure that the full truth is known. They do not lie, cheat or steal." What were they thinking, these future torturers, cluster-bombers, DU and Willy Pete dispensers, as they listened to, and dutifully applauded their Commander-in-Chief?
Here's the nutcase "Plan for Victory" in a nutshell (with emphasis):
1) "... To all who wear the uniform, I make you this pledge: America will not run in the face of car bombers and assassins so long as I am your Commander-in-Chief..." (Applause.)
2) "... We will never back down. We will never give in. And we will never accept anything less than complete victory..." (Applause.)
3) "... And as the Iraqi security forces stand up, coalition forces can stand down -- and when our mission of defeating the terrorists in Iraq is complete, our troops will return home to a proud nation..." (Applause.)
1 and 2 we've already heard ad nauseum, so lets have a look at the standing up and standing down business. Here's a bit of recent history to set the context for Bush's latest brainwave:
Apr. 5, 2004 "... Suddenly the Iraqi Civil Defense Corps (ICDC), a paramilitary force trained by the Americans, turned on the US soldiers and started to shoot at them instead .The Americans fled their vehicles and began to battle both the Mehdi Army of Shi'ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr and the ICDC members. Their vehicles were set ablaze..."
Nov. 8, 2004 "... Iraqi battalions fighting alongside Americans during the assault of Fallujah suffered mass desertions. One Iraqi battalion was reduced from 500 men down to 170 -- with 255 members quitting over one weekend..."
Dec. 21, 2004 "... Nineteen US soldiers were killed in a suicide attack inside a massively fortified US military base in Mosul. George W Bush offered his condolences but stressed that troops had a vital mission of peace in Iraq..."
Aug. 8, 2005. "... Iraqi soldiers being trained by US troops inside Taji military base, are afraid to set foot outside.” We’re all afraid. I can't go outside the base wearing these military clothes." "We all know soldiers who notice people photographing them with mobile phones and being followed," said a Shiite Muslim from Amara..."
Sept. 29, 2005 "... The number of Iraqi battalions capable of combat without U.S. support has dropped from three to one, the top American commander in Iraq, Gen. George Casey, told Congress Thursday, prompting Republicans to question whether U.S. troops will be able to withdraw next year..."
Oct. 03, 2005 "... The Senate heard testimony from America's generals, including top General George Casey, that only 1 out of 119 Iraqi army and security battalions are able to operate in combat situations without U.S. military backup. The generals' testimony meant that after two and a half years of U.S. efforts, only 750 men out of 200,000 can be relied upon to operate and obey orders independently in combat situations..."
But according to Bush's Plan for Victory, just two months later:
"... Now, there are over 120 Iraqi Army and Police combat battalions in the fight against the terrorists -- typically comprised of between 350 and 800 Iraqi forces. Of these, about 80 Iraqi battalions are fighting side by side with coalition forces, and about 40 others are taking the lead in the fight. Most of these 40 battalions are controlling their own battle space, and conducting their own operations against the terrorists with some coalition support -- and they're helping to turn the tide of this struggle in freedom's favor. America and our troops are proud to stand with the brave Iraqi fighters." (Applause.)
Are Americans going to buy this latest Bush bullshit? In Bush's simple mind, Iraqi and American GI's will soon be hobnobbing, chowin' down burgers and sippin’ brewskis like buds as they rampage around Iraq together. Newly befriended freedom-fighting troops will be hangin' poolside down at Saddam's palace and doing some fishing in the custom-built and stocked manmade lakes, before marauding out on patrol to go shoot up some rag-head terrorists. Iraq will then blossom into freedom and democracy, the oil-spigot will be cranked on full bore, the glorious troops will come home and we'll get yet another "Mission Accomplished" extravaganza.
Readers are reminded that America's dreadful blunder into Iraq represents a major plank in the shameless Weltanschauung of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) global-domination scheme. Here are PNAC's guiding principles, set out in 1997:
* we need to increase defense spending significantly if we are to carry out our global responsibilities today and modernize our armed forces for the future;
* we need to strengthen our ties to democratic allies and to challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values;
* we need to promote the cause of political and economic freedom abroad;
* we need to accept responsibility for America's unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles.
The Neocons conclude with "Such a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity may not be fashionable today. But it is necessary if the United States is to build on the successes of this past century and to ensure our security and our greatness in the next."
PNAC is comprised of many familiar faces in the Bush regime incuding Elliott Abrams, John Bolton, Jeb Bush, Linda Chavez, Dick Cheney, Zalmay Khalilzad, Charles Krauthammer, William Kristol, I. Lewis Libby, Clifford May, Richard Perle, Daniel Pipes, Dan Quayle, Donald Rumsfeld, William Schneider Jr., Paul Wolfowitz and Robert B. Zoellick, to name a few of its brightest lights.
This is the sneering, war-mongering, world-domineering, power-tripping clique of the Neocon cabal, the psychopathic architects and miserable masterminds of the unwinnable Iraq catastrophe. But they've blown it, the naked stupidity of their Commander-in-Chief is exposed and America will pay. The Neocon scheme is exhausted, Bushed.
bushed // adj. 3 Cdn informal (of a person) a living in the bush b crazy; insane (due to isolation ). 4 Austral. & NZ informal lost or confused.
-- The Canadian Oxford Dictionary
Ingmar Lee is a British Columbia treeplanter and primeval forest-protection activist. He writes from Pondicherry India. He can be reached at: ingmarz@gmail.com. | | | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |
