War Without End

Alpha · Last edited by Alpha on Fri May 13, 2005 12:00 am; edited 2 times in total

FILIBUSTER BOLTON: JINSAN JOHN BOLTON WILL BRING US WAR WITH IRAN FOR ISRAEL:

John Bolton is a hack for JINSA (Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs) whose mission will be to take on Russia at the UN Security Council in order to get the attack on Iran underway for Israel (how many more Americans will die and get horribly wounded for such an un-American agenda?):

http://www.robert-fisk.com/articles114.htm

http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20020902&s=vest

Just heard on the news that Iran will be taken up at the UN Security Council (for Israel, of course) if it goes ahead with its nuclear enrichment program... Looks like Scott Ritter's 'Sleepwalking to Disaster' article is right on track for a June attack on Iran (or shortly thereafter):

Scott Ritter: Sleepwalking to Disaster in Iran:

http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/wake-up-america-your-government-is-hijacked-by-zionism/2005/03/30/scott-ritter-sleepwalking-to-disaster-in-iran.php

http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=23715&page=4&pp=10

JINSA Israel firsters: IRAQ DOWN, IRAN LEFT TO GO:

http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/wake-up-america-your-government-is-hijacked-by-zionism/2005/04/06/jinsa-israel-firsters-iraq-down-iran-left-to-go.php

http://gorillaintheroom.blogspot.com

http://nomorewarforisrael.blogspot.com

Alpha

Zionist (JINSA/CSP/PNAC) Neocons and their US media cronies after Iran for Israel

Iranians Call for End to Nuke Negotiations - Yahoo! News

The entire Middle East is about to be enflamed even more.. Perhaps the entire world eventually too. All for these nefarious Zionists who serve Israel first..

http://story.news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050508/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_nuclear

Iranians Call for End to Nuke Negotiations By ALI AKBAR DAREINI, Associated Press Writer
Sun May 8, 2:59 PM ET

Iranian hard-liners on Sunday called for an end to nuclear negotiations with European powers and said they opposed any deal imposing limitations on Iran's nuclear program.

But Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi said Iran will remain committed to talks with Europeans despite a lack of progress.

Asefi said Iran has decided to resume certain nuclear activities it voluntarily suspended in November, but actual uranium enrichment — injecting uranium gas into centrifuges — will remain suspended for now despite hard-line calls for its resumption.

Enriched uranium can be used to produce warheads, but it also can be used to make electricity, which Iranian officials insist is the sole purpose of their nuclear program. Washington accuses Tehran of trying to build nuclear weapons.

Iranian state-run radio quoted Alaeddin Boroujerdi, the hard-line head of parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy committee, as saying Iran should end its suspension of uranium enrichment and that continued nuclear talks with European countries would be a waste of time.

"Iran has taken the necessary steps to build confidence and show transparency," Boroujerdi was quoted as saying. "The time has come to end the voluntary suspension of uranium enrichment."

France, Britain and Germany, acting on behalf of the 25-nation European Union, are offering Iran economic incentives in return for guarantees that Tehran will not use its nuclear program to make weapons. Last month's Iranian-European talks yielded no results.

Boroujerdi reportedly said more talks with the "three European powers will have no outcome other than being a waste of time."

"France, Britain and Germany have shown that they don't have the necessary capacity and powers to reach an understanding with the Islamic Republic of Iran," he added.

Sunday's hard-line Jomuri-e-Eslami newspaper said details of a deal between Iran and the Europeans allegedly under study was tantamount to "selling Iran's independence."

The daily claimed the deal will let Iran operate 3,000 centrifuges in Natanz in return for strict supervision of the facility and approval of the additional protocol to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty allowing intrusive inspections of Iran's facilities by experts from the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency.

Asefi, the Foreign Ministry spokesman, rejected the reported deal as media speculation.

Asefi said Iran won't restart actual uranium enrichment, but it has decided to resume some nuclear enrichment-related activities at its uranium conversion facility in Isfah

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/nucthreat.html

The above is how I thought it would go (just as Scott Ritter's neocon source has conveyed as well for that 'Sleepwalking to Disaster in Iran' article which one can scroll down to at the following URL):

JINSA Israel firsters: 'IRAQ DOWN, IRAN LEFT TO GO'

http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/wake-up-america-your-government-is-hijacked-by-zionism/2005/04/06/jinsa-israel-firsters-iraq-down-iran-left-to-go.php

The attack on Iran is coming soon... Maybe Israel and the USA will do it together (the following is part of an email reply from Kristoffer Larsson who wrote the 'A Zionist War' article which is linked at (Chomsky is wrong as well in that the Zionists in Israel and in the USA did indeed care about Iraq as one can read about via the 'A Clean Break'/war for Israel agenda conveyed earlier in this message thread and discussed on pages 261-269 and on page 321 of James Bamford's 'A Pretext for War' book):

http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=23715

Concerning the ME, I believe Iran is Israel's major concern. "Iran is the central problem of the Middle East," as Peres said earlier this year. Chomsky said, in December 2002:
The fact is that war with Iran is probably underway. It's known that about 12% of the Israeli airforce is in south eastern Turkey. They're there because they're preparing for the war against Iran. They don't care about Iraq. Iraq they figure's a pushover, but Iran has always been a problem for Israel. It's the one country in the region that they can't handle and they've been after the US to take it on for years. According to one report, the Israeli airforce is now flying at the Iranian border for intelligence, provocation and so on. And it's not a small airforce. It's bigger than the British airforce, bigger than any NATO power other than the US. So it's probably underway.

http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=15&ItemID=2804

I removed it from my article due to Jeff questioning the accuracy in stating that "12% of the Israeli airforce is in south eastern Turkey." I looked it up, and didn't find anything supporting Chomsky's claim. But he is right about Iran though. Especially if they have nuclear weapons.

Best regards,

Kristoffer Larsson

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment: Eyes on Damascus

http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/wake-up-america-your-government-is-hijacked-by-zionism/2005/05/09/comment-eyes-on-damascus.php
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://gorillaintheroom.blogspot.com

http://nomorewarforisrael.blogspot.com

Alpha

More Zionist Propaganda to have US attack Iran for Israel

Iran Poses Dangerous Threat, Peres Tells ADL

http://www.adl.org/PresRele/IslME_62/4712_62.htm

Alpha · Last edited by Alpha on Fri May 13, 2005 7:09 pm; edited 1 time in total

Alpha

Iran Poses Dangerous Threat, Peres Tells ADL

Jerusalem, May 9, 2005 … Iran poses a grave security threat to
Israel and the greater Middle East, Israeli Deputy Prime Minister
Shimon Peres told members of an Anti-Defamation League
(ADL) leadership mission visiting Jerusalem.

"Iran is the most dangerous country around, because the
mullahs believe their religion is superior, not unlike Hitler
believing the Aryan race superior," Mr. Peres told the ADL
leaders. "Iran's nuclear capability is in the hands of the Muslim
fundamentalists and terrorists who are opposed to modernity."

The ADL leadership mission led by Barbara B. Balser,
ADL National Chair and Abraham H. Foxman, National
Director was in Israel after participating in the March of the
Living
in Poland marking the 60th anniversary of the liberation of the
camps and defeat of the Nazis.

The delegation met Monday with several high ranking Israeli
government leaders, including Mr. Peres, Foreign Minister Silvan
Shalom, Minister of Justice Tzipi Livni, and Jeremy Issacharoff,
the Deputy Director-General of Strategic Affairs in the Foreign
Ministry.

On Iraq, Mr. Peres said that, "it was necessary to remove
Saddam Hussein, and no on else could do it but the
Americans." ...

Citing "the centrality of the threat of Iran toward Israel," Mr.
Issacharoff told of three areas of Iran's influence -- direct support
and funding for Palestinian terrorist groups, including Hamas
and Islamic Jihad; support for Hezbollah terrorists in Lebanon;
and Iran's developing nuclear program.

http://adl.org/PresRele/IslME_62/4712_62.htm

Alpha · Posted: Thu May 12, 2005 2:48 pm Post subject: Iran Threat Propaganda Heats Up

Just saw the following at www.whatreallyhappened.com

http://www.altpressonline.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=399

Iran Threat Propaganda Heats Up

As Alt reported last issue, the military assets are in place for a joint American/Israeli attack on Tehran. This attack, the Bush administration and its neocon string pullers believe, will trigger a coup by freedom-loving moderates inside the country, thus freeing the population from the grip of the fanatical Mad Mullahs. These grateful moderates will then align themselves with Uncle Sam, embrace democracy and reserve their oil for the exclusive use of American drivers, eager for a resurgence of Sport Utility vehicles.

Now the military-industrial-religious complex has to convince the American people that this attack is justified, and they have begun to do just that. Right wing radio, television, and even the main stream media are now referring to the “Iran Nuclear Crisis’ every chance they get. Jerome Corsi has just come out with a new book claiming that Tehran has already acquired a nuclear weapon of mass destruction and is planning on detonating its 150 kilotons in downtown Manhattan. Locally, Tom Bauerle and his main source of disinformation, Doug Hagman and his Northeast Intelligence Network, are spending considerable time and effort trying to convince their listeners that Iranian nuclear terrorists are lurking around every corner - and at the time selling corporate security systems to keep folks safe!

Alpha · Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 7:21 am Post subject: Bush pressured to drop UN choice

Bush pressured to drop UN choice

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4542917.stm

Alpha · Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 8:30 am Post subject: European Officials Warn Iran

European Officials Warn Iran
By Dafna Linzer
The Washington Post

Thursday 12 May 2005

Nuclear activity would mean end Of talks, letter says.
European officials notified Iran for the first time yesterday that they will walk away from two years of talks and sign on to a Bush administration strategy for punitive measures against Tehran if it makes good on threats to resume nuclear work in coming days.

In a sharply worded letter to Hassan Rouhani, the head of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, the foreign ministers of Britain, France and Germany warned that such work "would bring the negotiating process to an end." The letter added: "The consequences could only be negative for Iran."

The letter was an attempt to avert an escalation in the crisis over a program Iran says it developed in secret to produce nuclear energy, not atomic weapons. It appeared to have an immediate effect.

After weeks of threats, Iranian officials said they decided to hold off for now on a plan to notify the International Atomic Energy Agency today of their intent to restart a uranium-conversion facility in the town of Isfahan. Instead, an Iranian diplomat who spoke on the condition of anonymity said his government was exploring an offer contained in the letter for a four-way meeting sometime in the next two weeks to discuss the latest flare-up.

The willingness of the European trio to take Iran to task if it ends a suspension of its nuclear program after six months indicated that the Bush administration is having some success in persuading key allies to take a tougher approach with the Islamic republic.

The European shift was prompted in part by frustration with Iran but also by a change in tactics by the White House. After two years of refusing to back Europe's diplomatic track with Iran, the administration decided in March to support the process in exchange for written guarantees that if talks fell apart, Europe would agree to take the issue to the U.N. Security Council.

"This is the closest we've gotten to reporting Iran to the council since November 2003," said one U.S. official. If Iran informs the IAEA that it plans to resume work at any nuclear facility, "it will set off a series of outcomes and escalations towards the Security Council that will be hard to stop," said the official, who would discuss the sensitive discussions only on the condition of anonymity.

But neither European nor U.S. officials were confident yesterday of what a referral to the council would ultimately mean or how much support they could expect there. Unlike the IAEA board, the council has the international legal authority to impose economic sanctions or threaten Iran with force if its program is seen as a danger.

Both China and Russia have said they want the issue resolved within the IAEA, and Security Council members are leery of making any moves that could be perceived as hostile or that might be used to justify later military action against Iran.

Iran's program is within its rights under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which allows countries access to sensitive technology as long as it is used for peaceful purposes and not for weapons development.

Iran maintains that it is adhering to that arrangement. But the scale of its program, as well as the secrecy under which it was developed, has undermined its position and led the Bush administration to believe Iran intends to build nuclear bombs.

Iran's main nuclear site was exposed by a dissident group in 2002, setting off an investigation now in its third year. The U.N. inspectors have said they have no proof that Iran is trying to build nuclear weapons. But the Bush administration has not accepted those findings.

Under pressure, Iran suspended its program in an agreement with France, Britain and Germany that was supposed to yield economic benefits in exchange. In their letter, a copy of which was made available to The Washington Post yesterday, the European countries emphasized that the prospect of lucrative trade deals is still on the table but that "this sort of progress will be jeopardized" if the suspension breaks and the talks fall apart.

Iranian officials, too, have expressed frustration. They had expected the negotiations to be brief but say they now find themselves deep in Iran's presidential election season with little to show after six months.

At a round of talks in London last month, Iran offered a four-phase plan that would allow it to resume operating much of its program, including 3,000 centrifuges, equipment used to enrich uranium. That kind of industrial-scale capability could allow Iran to produce enough bomb-grade uranium for a single nuclear device within a year.

Iran, which is considered by U.S. intelligence to be seven years away from a bomb, has promised not to enrich uranium to those levels and said the machines could operate under 24-hour surveillance by U.N. inspectors.

But that offer was rejected by European negotiators who believe the only guarantee is an end to enrichment. If the sides are not able to resolve the latest crisis, Iran could go ahead with work at Isfahan. That decision would trigger an emergency meeting of the IAEA board next Wednesday in Vienna, where US and European negotiators would issue an ultimatum to Iran to back down, officials said.

If Iran breaks IAEA seals on equipment in Isfahan, one European official said, "they will be referred to the U.N. Security Council" during the board's regularly scheduled meeting on June 13. IAEA inspectors arrived in Isfahan yesterday and are standing by in case the Iranians decide to restart the facility.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Iran May Keep Freeze on Nuclear Activities
By George Jahn
The Associated Press

Thursday 12 May 2005

Diplomats say Iran considering keeping its freeze of suspect nuclear activities.
Iran is considering backing away from its threat to immediately resume activities that can be part of the process of making nuclear weapons, in an apparent attempt to defuse a showdown with key European nations, diplomats said Thursday.

One of the diplomats told The Associated Press that Iranian government officials in Tehran were discussing maintaining their freeze on uranium conversion because of a warning from key European countries that such a move would result in "consequences ... that would only be negative for Iran" diplomatic code for likely action by the UN Security Council.

In Tehran, Hasan Rowhani, Iran's top nuclear negotiator, appeared to be creating some wiggle room to allow his country to maneuver.

While saying his country would "resume part of its nuclear activities in the near future," his statement Thursday appeared more vague than other recent Iranian pronouncements warning such a move would come in the next few days.

It seemed in line with earlier repeated Iranian insistence that the country has a right to enrich uranium and conduct related activities including conversion. Tehran has repeatedly served notice any suspension of enrichment and related programs program would be temporary and brief.

The various signals out of Tehran left officials at the International Atomic Energy Agency the U.N. watchdog monitoring Iran's nuclear activities guessing about Iran's intentions.

Speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue, one diplomat close to the agency earlier said the IAEA had expected formal notification that conversion activities would restart on Thursday. And Sirous Nasseri, a senior Iranian envoy confirmed hours after arriving in Vienna on Wednesday that he was carrying a letter from his government to the IAEA.

While he declined to disclose the contents of his letter, diplomats who follow both Iran's nuclear dossier and the IAEA's work said it likely contained word of Iran's intention to resume conversion as part of a process whose end result is uranium hexafluoride a substance that can be turned into either energy producing uranium or more highly enriched weapons grade material.

A well-connected diplomat said Nasseri met with the IAEA official in charge of monitoring Iran's freeze late Wednesday but did not deliver the letter, describing the encounter as a "social call."

Any formal notification of resumption of conversion would torpedo Iran's talks with France, Germany and Britain. Those talks are intended to ease suspicions about Tehran's ultimate nuclear aims. The United States says Iran wants to make a nuclear bomb, but Iran insists it is interested only in a source of energy.

Washington has long maintained that Iran's nuclear program kept secret for nearly two decades until revealed by a dissident group in 2002 is meant to make weapons, and as such, Tehran's nuclear dossier belongs in the hands of the Security Council. But because of strong resistance at previous IAEA board meetings, it reluctantly embraced the European diplomatic efforts.

The on-off talks, which began last year, have failed from the beginning to find common ground on the European insistence that Iran scrap or at last agree to a long-term suspension of uranium enrichment and related activities, and Tehran's insistence that any freeze was voluntary and short-lived. The last formal round ended inconclusively April 29.

The Europeans appeared braced for the inevitable. Beyond their letter, delivered Wednesday in Tehran to government officials, diplomats in Vienna said the three nations had begun informal contacts with the IAEA about convening a special session of its 35-nation board should the Iranians tell the agency they were ready to break IAEA seals on conversion equipment in the central city of Isfahan.

Such a session could be called within days of formal notification by Iran of plans to resume conversion. The diplomats said a likely scenario would see board nations giving Iran a two- to three-week deadline to change its mind. If it refused, sentiment at the next board meeting probably in June would be strong to declare Tehran in violation of its agreements to suspend enrichment while negotiating in good faith with the Europeans. In that case, the board might refer the case to the U.N. Security Council.

One senior Western diplomat said the three European nations also were consulting with the United States on a common course of action. A senior U.S. official in Washington said earlier that the Bush administration was conferring closely with the allies and that all the governments were determined there would be consequences for Iran if it ends the moratorium.

While the Europeans had been key in previous board opposition to referring Iran to the Security Council, senior officials in several European capitals suggested any resumption of reprocessing would leave them no choice but to support such a move.

"I think the reaction of the ... Europeans is going to be very tough if conversion resumes," said one who spoke on condition of anonymity. "It's not possible to get the Europeans scared."

Alpha

Galloway hounded by AIPAC cell within U.S. Congress; Bolton tied to
same
cell

http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/051305Madsen/051305madsen.html

By Wayne Madsen
Online Journal Contributing Writer

May 13, 2005—At a time when the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee
(AIPAC) is being investigated for its role in an espionage case
involving
Larry Franklin, a Pentagon and Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA)
official
indicted for passing top secret classified information to two AIPAC
officials and possibly the government of Israel, a senator who is
bought and
paid for by AIPAC—Republican Senator Norm Coleman of Minnesota—has
decided
to change the subject and point to newly elected Respect Party Member
of
Parliament George Galloway as receiving oil funds from Saddam Hussein.

The charges against Galloway and other politicians around the world
were
originally based on documents secured from the rubble of the Iraqi
Foreign
Ministry and proffered by the corrupt Ahmad Chalabi—the man who
pressured
the Bush administration to use discredited "intelligence" about
Saddam's
mobile chemical and biological weapons laboratories from an alcoholic,
congenital liar and mentally unbalanced cousin of one of his
associates, an
individual code-named "Curveball."

Coleman, with pro-AIPAC Democratic Senator Joseph Lieberman, is using
the
Senate Permanent Sub-committee on Investigations to rehash charges that
foreign and even U.S. officials financially benefited from the United
Nations' Oil for Food program. These charges, which later were proven
false,
first surfaced in the neoconservative controlled London-based Daily
Telegraph, owned by the Hollinger Corporation, a company that had
financial
ties to arch-neoconservative Richard Perle. The charges by both the
Daily
Telegraph and now Coleman's committee are based on documents as bogus
as the
Niger yellowcake documents and those proffered by Curveball and Chalabi
about Iraq's fantasized weapons of mass destruction. Galloway
successfully
sued the Telegraph for libel over its baseless Oil for Food allegations
against him.

The only new information on which Coleman is basing his allegations are
interviews conducted with Iraq's former vice president and deputy prime
minister both of whom are in U.S. custody and awaiting war crimes
trials led
by Iraqi prosecutor Salam Chalabi, a nephew of Ahmad Chalabi and law
partner
of Marc Zell, the Washington, DC, law partner of Douglas Feith, the
person
for whom accused spy Larry Franklin worked at the Pentagon while spying
for
Israel. If ex-Vice President Taha Yassin Ramadan and former Deputy
Prime
Minister Tariq Aziz are receiving even one-eight the harsh treatment
meted
out by U.S. troops and Israeli contractors to prisoners at the Abu
Ghraib
concentration camp, none of their so-called testimonies are worth the
paper
on which they are printed.

Coleman charges that Galloway received up to 20 million barrels of oil
allocations between 2000 and 2003 from Saddam's government. Galloway
rightly
charges that Coleman and other committee members are "lickspittle
Republicans" acting in the servitude of Bush and his cronies. In
addition to
the statements of the imprisoned Saddam Hussein officials, Coleman is
also
basing his new allegations based on documents retrieved from the Iraqi
Oil
Ministry from convicted embezzler, con man, and neocon puppet, Ahmad
Chalabi.

What has Coleman's panties in a twist is the fact that in the recent
British
elections, Galloway, who was expelled from the Labor Party for his
anti-Iraq
war and anti-Bush politics, made easy work of his Labor Party opponent
and
Tony Blair sycophant, Oona King, an African-Jewish daughter
of—ironically—an
African-American draft evader from the Vietnam War. King was one of
Tony
Blair's most ardent supporters for his decision to join Bush in a
genocidal
war against Iraq. For that, she earned the support of the international
neoconservative network of influence holders and peddlers that can,
according to a senior Bush administration official, create their own
reality
because of their ownership of much of the international media. However,
King
also earned the enmity of her large Muslim constituency in East
London's
Bethnal Green and Bow district. They rejected King and threw their
political
weight behind Galloway.

There is little doubt that the neocons in the British Labor Party are
working hand-in-glove with people like Coleman and his neocon friends
and
political supporters in AIPAC to punish Galloway and make it hard for
him to
use his reinstated House of Commons platform to launch expected fierce
broadsides against Blair and other pro-Iraq War Laborites, most notably
Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, Defense Secretary John Reid, and former
Defense Secretary Geoff Hoon. The neocons also want to deal a blow to
the
anti-war Respect Party, which gave Labor a run for its money in a
number of
other hotly contested constituencies in Britain.

Coleman, who also sits on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, used
his
Oil for Food charges against Galloway, former French Interior Minister
Charles Pasqua, and an unnamed former French foreign minister to
bolster the
nomination of John Bolton as U.S. ambassador to the UN. The Bolton
affair
has revealed even more proof that a shadow intelligence network has
operated
within the U.S. government.

Bolton had on his staff a "special adviser" named Matthew Freedman who
pulled down a $110,000 per annum salary. Freedman is also a lobbyist
who
represents "private clients." He refused to tell the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee who those clients were. However, it has been
discovered
that Freedman, a long time GOP operative like Bolton, is tied to the
same
oil industry network that once used Vice President Cheney and Secretary
of
State Condoleezza Rice as agents of influence.

While working for the GOP-connected public relations firm of Black,
Manafort, Stone & Kelly (BMS&K) and the PBN Company, Freedman counted
Chevron, Bechtel, Shell, and the governments of Nigeria and Kazakhstan
as
clients. Freedman also represented Philippine dictator Ferdinand Marcos
and
Philippine President Salvador Laurel. According to The Washington
Times,
Laurel sought the assistance of the George H. W. Bush administration to
oust
President Corazon Aquino in a military coup.

Other espionage charges have swirled around Bolton. The State
Department's
Bureau of Near East Affairs reported that Bolton met with Mossad
officials
in Israel without obtaining country clearance from the bureau. During a
trip
to the United States, former Mossad official Uzi Arad was questioned by
FBI
agents about his connections to Larry Franklin. FBI officials were also
interested in an Israeli Embassy official named Naor Gilon, the chief
of
political affairs and widely believed a major Mossad asset at the
Washington
diplomatic post. The FBI possesses videotaped surveillance tape of
Gilon
having a luncheon meeting with two AIPAC officials and Franklin at a
Washington hotel.

Bolton is also under suspicion for his ties to Taiwan. Before joining
the
Bush administration, Bolton was on the payroll of the government of
Taiwan,
advocating UN membership for the breakaway island nation. Like Bolton's
secret trips to Israel, Britain, and other nations, Donald Keyser, the
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for East Asian and Pacific Affairs
and
a colleague of Bolton, made secret trips to Taiwan. He was arrested by
the
FBI in September 2004 after he was witnessed passing classified
documents to
Taiwanese agents in Washington.

There is ample evidence of a major foreign intelligence penetration of
the
United States State and Defense Departments, as well as U.S.
intelligence
agencies, involving Franklin, AIPAC officials, Mossad agents, and
leading
individuals in the neoconservative network operating from inside the
White
House, the Pentagon, the State Department, the U.S. Congress, and think
tanks such as the American Enterprise Institute, Washington Institute
for
Near East Policy, the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs,
the
Heritage Foundation, and the Hudson Institute. Bolton is a central
figure in
this cabal.

The focus of the U.S. investigatory apparatus should not be on George
Galloway and his newly-enfranchised East London supporters, but should
be on
the dark sinews that bind together anti-democratic intelligence
functionaries in Washington, Jerusalem, and London. In addition, with
his
possible links to illegal espionage and influence peddling, in addition
to
other serious charges surrounding John Bolton, now is not the time for
the
U.S. Senate to be confirming a person who could be the most damaging
U.S.
government employee for national security since the Cold War days of
John
Walker, Ronald Pelton, and Jonathan Pollard.

Wayne Madsen is a Washington-based journalist and nationally
distributed
columnist.

Alpha · Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 9:02 pm Post subject: ...in less than nine months

OC Register Article on AIPAC Espionage

http://gorillaintheroom.blogspot.com/2005/05/oc-register-on-spy-scandal.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Additional Zionist propaganda to get the USA to attack Iran for Israel:

...in less than nine months
By Haaretz Service and News Agencies

Iran may develop the know-how to make nuclear weapons in six to nine
months, Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom said on Friday. He called on
the
United Nations to impose sanctions on Iran.
"Iran poses an existential threat, and that's why I think that the
entire world
understands that it's impossible to give such an extremist regime the
possibility
of having a nuclear bomb that can essentially threaten the integrity
of the
world," Shalom said Friday in an interview with Israel Radio.
The day before, Shalom warned that Tehran was close to knowing how to
make nuclear weapons.
Advertisement
"Iran's announcement of their decision to renew uranium enrichment
is, of
course, a very dangerous announcement that must be viewed with
appropriate
concern," he told foreign diplomats at a reception at the President's
Residence
on Thursday. "Unfortunately, we see that indeed Iran will do
everything to
reach nuclear capability. The question is not whether Iran will have
a nuclear
bomb in 2009 or 2011. The question is when will they have sufficient
knowledge [to build one], and we think that this possibility even
exists, possibly,
in another six to nine months."
Shalom also called on the International Atomic Energy Association to
use its
JUNE 13 meeting to make a "clear and unequivocal decision" to bring
the Iran
issue before the United Nations Security Council, which he said "has
the sole
authority to impose sanctions on Iran."
European states warn Iran not to resume nuclear work
France, Britain and Germany have warned Iran they will break off
talks and join
Washington in seeking UN Security Council action if Tehran makes good
on its
threats to resume atomic work, European Union officials said on
Thursday.
The foreign ministers of the European Union's three biggest powers
sent a
strongly worded letter to Hassan Rohani, Iran's chief nuclear
negotiator,
warning that resuming potentially arms-related nuclear work "would
bring the
negotiating process to an end," an EU diplomat quoted the letter as
saying.
"The consequences could only be negative for Iran," it said.
On Thursday night the head of Iran's nuclear agency said it may
postpone
resumption of uranium reprocessing after increasing European pressure
not to
end its suspension of a program that officials fear could result in a
nuclear
bomb.
"No certain day is fixed for resumption of reprocessing. It is
possible to
postpone it some days," Gholamreza Aghazadeh, the head of Iran's
Atomic
Organization, told the Tehran state-run television in a live
roundtable
discussion.
Israel Defense Forces Chief of Staff Lieutenant General Moshe Ya'alon
told
Army Radio on Thursday that Israel knows how to protect itself
against a
potential Iranian threat.
"Iran is the central proponent of terrorism and Islamic fanaticism
and it has a
non-conventional leadership that is liable to develop
non-conventional
weaponry," Ya'alon said. "Israel, therefore, needs to know how to
defend itself
against every threat and will always know how to do so."
Earlier Thursday, Rohani, Iran's chief nuclear negotiator, said
Tehran would
resume some nuclear activities because it cannot continue nuclear
negotiations
with Europeans.
"Continuation of negotiations in their present format is not possible
for us,"
Rohani told state-run television, saying the talks were not balanced
and were
costly for Iran.
"The basic point that the Islamic Republic of Iran will resume part
of its nuclear
activities in the near future is definite," Rohani had said.
British Prime Minister Tony Blair spelled out the potential
consequences, telling
reporters: "We certainly will support referral to the United Nations
Security
Council if Iran breaches its obligations and undertakings."
The United States believes Iran's nuclear energy program is a front
to develop
atomic weapons and has been pressing for Iran's case to be sent to
the 15-
member UN council for possible economic sanctions and other actions.
The EU shares U.S. suspicions but has offered incentives to try to
get Tehran
to give up its atomic fuel program, which Iran insists is only for
nuclear power
plants, not for arms.
French Foreign Minister Michel Barnier also urged Iran to maintain
its voluntary
freeze on enrichment-related activities.
"We continue to hope that Iran will not go ahead with this move, for
which it is
aware of the consequences," Barnier told the French Senate upper
house of
parliament.
The EU letter proposed "ministerial level talks" between the Iranians
and
Europeans within the next two weeks to break the impasse and avoid a
crisis,
EU diplomats said.

http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/spages/575337.html

War Without End

The global war against terror, news about the illegal invasion of Iraq, the corporate puppet presidents, the war criminal Tony Blair, September 11th 2001, the USS Liberty and New World Order crimes against humanity.

JINSAN JOHN BOLTON WILL BRING US WAR WITH IRAN FOR ISRAEL