| Author | Message | | Alpha | |  | | outsider | | Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 11:41 am Post subject: |
| Sorry, Alpha, but the US WAS NOT ATTACKED ON 9/11 because of it's support for Israel (though that would have been a credible explanation, had the Muslims really attacked the US on 9/11). No matter what the admittedly brutally tortured Mohammed Sheik, or the 'Comic Cuts' '9/11 Commission Report', has to say about the matter, the truth is, Afghanistan was attacked by the US because the Taliban would not agree to provide pipeline routes, and adequate security for them, through it's territory for the transit of Caspian gas and oil. The US told the Taliban, they would either give them a carpet of gold (if they complied) or bury them under a carpet of bombs. Re '9/11 Commission Report', I suggest interested people read these books: 9/11 Contradictions: An Open Letter to Congress and the Press by David Ray Griffin Christian Faith and the Truth Behind 9/11 : A Call to Reflection and Action by David Ray Griffin Hardcover, SPCK Publishing, ISBN 0664231179 (0-664-23117-9) Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory by David Ray Griffin The 9/11 Commission Report : Omissions and Distortions by David Ray Griffin 'The New Pearl Harbor' by David Ray Griffin There are of course many other books, but Griffin is a widely known and respected author, with many books written on other subjects before 9/11. There are also a host of excellent videos and websites, probably the best sites for newcomers to the Search for Truth (as opposed to the 'Lap up the MSM & Government line' brigade) would be: patriotsquestion911.org (top-level US & world opinion); PilotsFor9/11Truth.org (pilots); ae911truth.org (architects & engineers). I would ask that before anyone replies to this, they at least check out the websites | |  | | Alpha | |  | | outsider | | Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 10:22 pm Post subject: |
| To me, Bamford is a busted flush. I'm glad he aceepted the 'Liberty' questions, and gave a decent response. But he has never responded to my email (also posted to him), which I have copied onto another 'Liberty' thread. And how a serious, knowledgeable guy like him can accept the Government 'narrative' that bin Laden was responsible beggats belief. He has either never investigated the loads of evidence in books, videos and on the net, or he chooses to 'cock a blind one'. He's well-to-do and successful; why rock the boat? 'Gatekeeper' springs to mind. | |  | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |