| Author | Message | | Ilana_Halevy | | Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:54 pm Post subject: Question that all conspirators avoid like fire |
| If Israelis planned attack on Liberty, why they did not use iron bombs, but absolutelly innefective napalm canisters? 
None of conspirators will ever answer this question. | |  | | Jefferson Davis | | Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:14 pm Post subject: |
| They used rockets, machine guns and their first targets were the antennas to end any outgoing communications for assistance..all supported by testimony.
The PT boats machined gunned life rafts to kill any survivors and used torpedoes to sink the ship totally...all supported by testimony of the crew.
Nevermind that they couldn't see 8 ft high unique US Navy vessel markings and Western letters from 800 yards away that were visible for miles. They still to this day claim that it was thought to be a one-third as long rusting 1920's steam tramp/horse carrier that was never at sea in the perios yet the Israelis knew the USS Liberty was about.. Nevermind the numerous overflights before the attack and the refusal to allow the pilots to be interviewed in their claim as an "accident". Nevermind the sealed files today and secrecy still surrounding these deliberate murders.
Iron bombs were never brought up and offer nothing to the discussion other than Liberty apologists to avoid and divert Israeli culpability and US government treason.
www.ussliberty.com
Seek and you shall find all your answers. Zionists hate truth so I understand your reluctance to do so.
Nice try Ilana but no sale. | | | | Ilana_Halevy | | Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:27 pm Post subject: |
| As I said, no answer 
| Quote: | | They used rockets, machine guns and their first targets were the antennas to end any outgoing communications for assistance..all supported by testimony. |
If they used iron bombs instead stupid napalm rockets they would sink Liberty in 2 minutes.
WHY THEY DID NOT USE THEM? No answer. | | | | Jefferson Davis | | Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:45 pm Post subject: |
| As per usual.
You have no earthly proof that a said "iron bombs" "would sink Liberty in 2 minutes". (how fucking non-technical can you not get?) that it would have happened. Perhaps the IAF has no experience in such matters as I don't recall any ship attacks using such means by the Israeli Navy since 1948. In fact the the Israeli Navy is considered the red haired basted armed service in the IDF. The IDF Court of Inquiry used this same argument of its believed "inferior" status as an part of the excuse for the attack.
As Japanese used many bombs on many US ships in WW2 and did not sink them i.e. Franklin and Yorktown and many more. A bomb hit is not an automatic sinking and to claim as such just shows how pathetic your post, knowledhe or understand of suc matters are. The US Navy is renown across the world for damage/fire control which they proved admirably depite a coordinated land and sea attack on an vessel in international waters.
And keep avoiding the vessel marking issues as you ALWAYS do. Remember the USS Liberty is the victim, you are the murderers.
You just another fucking lying Jew of a nation of lying Jews. So STFU Ilana, you don't know dick except that it goes up an orifice. | | | | Ilana_Halevy | | Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:37 am Post subject: |
| | Quote: | | Perhaps the IAF has no experience in such matters as I don't recall any ship attacks using such means by the Israeli Navy since 1948. |
Yes its a rocket science that if u want to sink a boat u need a high explosive bomb and not napalm canisters
Fact is that canisters DID hit Liberty. However they were napalm and thats why they brought only minor damage.
| Quote: | | In fact the the Israeli Navy is considered the red haired basted armed service in the IDF. |
Yep that only strength my point. IDF Navy was weak thats why if u plan think Libertty u would rellay on strong air force and not weak lame navy.
| Quote: | | As Japanese used many bombs on many US ships in WW2 and did not sink them i.e. Franklin and Yorktown and many more. |
1) WW2 planes carried much less bombs than Mirage jets.
2) US ships had extremely heavy air defense Liberty had none, nada, zero.
3) Battle ships were strongly armored, unlike cattle carrier Liberty which had no armor at all.
Even despite it ships was heavily damaged. Thinking cattle carrier Liberty was a piece of cake even for most lame pilots. | | | | DanielDives | | Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:03 am Post subject: |
| Well, if you prefer to call 34 dead and 170 wounded 'minor damage,' go figure.
Q; Yes its a rocket science that if u want to sink a boat u need a high explosive bomb and not napalm canisters
R: What kind of cock-n-doodle bull shit is that? Why TF do you think they sent in those MPT boats with torpedoes? To wave at the victims?
Torpodoes sink ships. Even the Japanese used torpedoes in their attack on Pearl Harbor, besides bombs. Torpedoes hit ships below the sea/water level. The MPT crew had to set the speed and depth of those torpedoes in order to strike at the right depth and point. That's why they didn't use binoculars or anything, they just threw them overboard and hoped for the best.
But I'm happy to see you feel so much for the dead and wounded.
I'm sure the survivors would love to embrace you....
The question is though, would they ever let you go? | | | | Jefferson Davis | | Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:36 am Post subject: |
| Her posts make no sense at all. She's another USS Liberty apologist wack job. I get a headache trying to decipher what she writes.
JHC! | | | | DanielDives | | Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 5:54 am Post subject: |
| Hi JD,
Think she has the guts to call Ennes a 'conspirator' in his face [or any of the survivors for that matter]? | | | | Ilana_Halevy | | Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:22 pm Post subject: |
| | DumbDUmb wrote: | | Well, if you prefer to call 34 dead and 170 wounded 'minor damage,' go figure. |
Most of casualties and damage were from torpedo hit and not from jets, ya dumb imbecile.
| Quote: | | What kind of cock-n-doodle bull shit is that? Why TF do you think they sent in those MPT boats with torpedoes? To wave at the victims? |
Thats what i am asking, ya dumb degenerate. Why they sent torpedo boats when they could EASILY sink ship with fighters and bombers?
Why Israeli planes did not use high explosive bombs?
Dumb dumb and al jeffie cowarldy avoiud this question. | | | | Jefferson Davis | | Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 3:30 pm Post subject: |
| Who said it was an "accident"....Israel.
Who attacked a ship in international waters? Israel.
Who machined gunned life rafts? Israel.
Why do you avoid answering the ship markings issues with your silly obfuscations and diversions, 3 PT boats and all their crew couldn't see 8 ft high freshly painted markings unique in the world from 800 yards away.
That's why you insist on such stupid responses . They didn't use "iron bombs" because they couldn't hit the broad side of a barn. Just like they could only hit a 450 ft long ship with one torpedo fired out of six.
Who refuses to this day to allow the pilots to be interviewed? Israel.
Your defense of your county's criminality is noted.
The type of bombs is just a diversions from the typical lying apologist who refuses to answer or explain any other questions by offering unrelated busllshit.
Keep avoiding the motives and your country's responsibility in war crimes which is typical.
You know it as does everyone else. . | | | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |
