| Author | Message | | Cowboy | | Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 6:07 am Post subject: |
| 
DanielDives continues to refuse to make the simple statement that the crewmembers did not lie under oath, while he pretends to support the crew and runs from their sworn testimony.
Top says that the crew did not lie under oath, but when presented with their sworn testimony, calls it a 'waste of time'.
Transparent. | |  | | Jefferson Davis | | Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 8:47 am Post subject: |
| | Quote: |
DanielDives continues to refuse to make the simple statement that the crewmembers did not lie under oath, while he pretends to support the crew and runs from their sworn testimony.
Top says that the crew did not lie under oath, but when presented with their sworn testimony, calls it a 'waste of time'.
Transparent. |
Laughing at 34 dead and their 40 years of despair. Typical for you Mr. AIPAC. Always about t6he Jews and the protection of their honor .Tell us again about your US naval service you Israeli First son of a bitch. It's just a joke to you..
No one can deny anything that if it's lead counsel has filed an affidavit that the record was tampered with. FACT.
14 crewmen out of a crew of 294 is not a through investigation. FACT.
Why have another another investigation you ask, there has never been a Congressional investigation into the attack of the USS Liberty. FACT.
You're the one who opposes an investigation.
You, no one else. FACT except the Israelis and their cover up up cronies. FACT
You're a traitor. | | | | Top | | Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:40 pm Post subject: |
| | Quote: | | Top says that the crew did not lie under oath, but when presented with their sworn testimony, calls it a 'waste of time'. |
YOU ARE A WASTE OF TIME IDIOT | | | | DavidEngland | | Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 2:54 pm Post subject: USS Liberty Pathetic Explanation of Zionist conspiracy |
| | This is pathetic. Why would the Israelis intentionally attack a U.S. ship, an ally ship, except in the confusion of warfare? Isn't the Zionist conception undeniably linked and allied with Israel. If one believe this drivel that Israel intentionally attacked the U.S. ship would this not indicate also that Israel and the U.S. did not jointly attack the World Trade Center. Perhaps this is an unfortunate accident in which the U.S. navy decided it was culpable for the mistake that led to it being in the wrong place at the wrong time. The whole premise of the poster is ridiculous. It was clearly visible on the deck and from the flags, it was a Yank ship. Please, how many times in warfare have parties masked their sails and done even worse. There is no motive for this attack. I suppose the attack was previewed in the Protocols. | | | | Jefferson Davis | | Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 3:40 pm Post subject: |
| This is pathetic. Why would the Israelis intentionally attack a U.S. ship, an ally ship, except in the confusion of warfare?
If it was an a"accident" why do the US and Israel governments fear and avoid any attempts at an investigation? You need an open and honest investigation to find answers to yours and the crew's many unanswered questions.
Where was the confusion? The Israelis had known of its existence and tracked it a day and one half before the attack? It was broad daylight on a clear day. Is there any validity to "Project Cyanide"? Your argument is superficial as the whole issue of the Liberty attack has been why no open and honest investigation of the attack. The NCOI and report is in doubt., Much is still classified, There has never been any investigation of the attack in 40 years despite the apologists claiming anywhere from 8 to 14 investigations. There has never been one except the very flawed NCOI. A 10,000 dollar reward still lays unclaimed for proof of any such USS Liberty investigation as continually spewed by the apologists and the ignorant.
Isn't the Zionist conception undeniably linked and allied with Israel. If one believe this drivel that Israel intentionally attacked the U.S. ship would this not indicate also that Israel and the U.S. did not jointly attack the World Trade Center.
Please tell us how a 1967 event and a 2002 event intertwine? You brought it up yet the USS Linerty is "pathetic". Are you trolling?
Perhaps this is an unfortunate accident in which the U.S. navy decided it was culpable for the mistake that led to it being in the wrong place at the wrong time.
When is "international waters" being at the wrong place at the wrong tome? When can nations attack unarmed ships wantonly without identifying them? The ship was clearly known and visually recognizable. Yet Israel can attack it by air and sea for over an hour, say it is a 1920's rusty tramp steamer half it's size with 5-8 ft. Western ship/hull designations (visible for miles) versus Aranbic designation and such stupidty gets accepted without question. There were ywo air attacks, believed a t least 9 pilots (good eyesight is needed), 3 MTB capatains and their crew with binoculars never made the conncection yet a bleeding US Captain, under attack can determines the MTB's were Israeli at a mile and a quarter away yet the MTB's still attacked, torpedoed the boat, strafed the ship for over 20 minutes, fired on life rafts. etc.
The whole premise of the poster is ridiculous.
It's your ignorance on display. If it was an "accident" then why the organized and continual opposition to an investigation that would just prove you right?
It was clearly visible on the deck and from the flags, it was a Yank ship. Please, how many times in warfare have parties masked their sails and done even worse.
I'm not sure I know what you mean but it's further proof that an investigation is needed.
There is no motive for this attack.
You need an investigation to find the facts and if a motive exists. There has been none. I hope this sinks in soon for you.
I suppose the attack was previewed in the Protocols.
Wrong book, try the rabbit hole by design. Nice try though at obfuscation and smearing the crew and the dead by implicating them with the Protocols. Obviously another official Liberty apologist. The Zionists are pleased.
The knowledgeable laugh at your weak shit amateur attempt, ignorate and rote parroting of discredited manufactured nonsense. | | | | Cowboy | | Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 7:09 pm Post subject: |
| | Quote: | | Laughing at 34 dead and their 40 years of despair. |
No, laughing at you still trying to pretend that you defend the crew when you still persist on refusing to make the simple statementthat the crewmembers did not lie under oath.
| al Jeffie wrote: | | No, I'm not a citizen under your fascist statist "Amerika" and damn proud of it........ | | | | | Cowboy | | Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 7:17 pm Post subject: |
| | al Jeffie wrote: | | DavidEngland wrote: | | This is pathetic. Why would the Israelis intentionally attack a U.S. ship, an ally ship, except in the confusion of warfare? |
If it was an a"accident" why do the US and Israel governments fear and avoid any attempts at an investigation? |
There was an investigation by the US Navy, the fellow sailors of the USS Liberty crew.
You say the Navy lied. You believe that the crewmembers who tsetified there lied under oath.
| Quote: | | Where was the confusion? |
It was day 4 of an extremely intense war that Israel was forced to be fighting on multiple fronts against forces that were hugely larger than Israel's. It is a military thing. You wouldn't understand having never served a day in your life in service to the country you sometimes falsely calim as your own.
| Quote: | | Please tell us how a 1967 event and a 2002 event intertwine? |
9/11 was in 2001, faker.
| Quote: | | When is "international waters" being at the wrong place at the wrong tome? When can nations attack unarmed ships wantonly without identifying them? |
Friendly fire incidents happen frequently, in international waters and elsewhere. On marked ships flying flags. A fact that you consistently avoid. | | | | DanielDives | | Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 7:24 am Post subject: |
| Q: Friendly fire incidents
R: Fallacy alert!
The USS Liberty [or the US] was no participant in this war. The USS Liberty was a neutral ship in international waters.
A two hour accident.
Sure. | | | | Cowboy | | Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 7:31 am Post subject: |
| | Quote: | | The USS Liberty [or the US] was no participant in this war. |
That's what made it friendly.
The US Naval Attache assigned to Tel Aviv flew out to the USS Liberty aboard an Israeli helicopter. Does that sound hostile to you?
| Quote: | | The USS Liberty was a neutral ship in international waters. |
Friendly fire incidents happen in international waters as well as elsewhere.
| Quote: | | A two hour accident. |
It wasn't 2 hours.
You really can't get much right. | | | | DanielDives | | Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 7:40 am Post subject: |
| FF: Accidental firing on one's own or one's allies' forces instead of the enemy.
The US was neutral.
Got it? | | | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |
