| Author | Message | | Jefferson Davis | | Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 6:35 am Post subject: |
| Fuck off you AIPAC apologist. Enough of your spam and what you want.
It's about the crew and families of the Liberty that you don't give a damn about
Fraud. | |  | | Cowboy | | Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 6:59 am Post subject: |
| 
Consistent evasion and diversion by false personal attack from you.
The fact is that I am still the only one here who has clearly and definitively stated that the USS Liberty crewmembers did not lie under oath at the US Navy Court of Inquiry.
Did the USS Liberty crewmembers lie under oath at the US Navy Court of Inquiry????
Yes or No ???
Your continuing evasion shows just what a fraud you are, al Jeffie. Obviously your islamoleftist handlers will not allow you to definitively support the integrity of the Liberty crewmembers. | | | | Jefferson Davis | | Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 7:12 am Post subject: |
| Fuck off and DIE you AIPAC apologist. Enough of your spam and what you want.
It's about the crew and families of the Liberty that you don't give a damn about
Fraud. | | | | Cowboy | | Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 7:12 am Post subject: |
| Getting this string back on topic from al Jeffie's diversions....
Why is it that the pretend defenders of the Liberty crew insist that Israel intended to quickly sink the Liberty and kill the crew, when the sworn testimony of Liberty crewmembers show that when the Liberty finally identified itself as a US Navy vessel, the Israelis immediately ceased the attack and offered assistance?
Proceedings of the U.S. Navy Court of Inquiry, 18 June 1967
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/uss-liberty/2007/04/27/proceedings-of-the-u-s-navy-court-of-inquiry-18-june-1967.php
Sworn Testimony of Chief Communications Technician Harold J. Thompson, US Navy, Crewmember of the USS Liberty
Pages 88-89
Word was passed again to standby for torpedo attack starboard side and again word went out for signalmen. Once again I told them I could not read flags, but if I could be of service. I was asked to report to the bridge, which I did. When I got up there, Signalman David was attempting to rig a hand light. I assisted him. We went to the starboard wing of the bridge and one torpedo boat was making a run straight at us off the starboard beam while the other two stood off. At the Captain;s directions, David sent, "US Naval Ship" "US Naval Ship". When they were about 500 yards off, the torpedo boat turned astern and came up on the stern on the starboard side and flashed, "Do you need help?"
Q. Was this before the torpedo hit?
A. This was after the torpedo hit us, and we were surprised by the attack. The Captain gave us word. He said, "no, thank you." We sent this back to the boat, and our steering was somewhat erratic and they came up on the port side then. David went across, I followed him, and saw on the last part of that message, David said, "Do you want us to standby?" I passed this word to the Captain. He said, "no, thank you." We sent this to the patrol boat. They came up along port side, I say roughly 100 yards off, flashed "good luck" and dropped astern along with the other two which had come up to the stern, to a mile or a mile and a half back, just out of sight. Then they made one high speed run directly astern and somewhere between a quarter and a half mile back mad a u-turn and disappeared. That was the last we saw of them. Shortly afterwards, an Israeli helicopter came, hovered off the bridge and tried to hand signal us, and dropped a note on the forecastle which was brought to the bridge...
Why is it?
Notice that the ship identification from the Liberty to the Israeli boats was done with signal lights, and not radio. The only people who knew about the communication were the Israelis on the boats and a few crewmembers on the Liberty. The Israelis could instead have sunk the Liberty with all hands with no record of the Liberty having identified itself - if that had really been their intent.
Or do the pretend defenders of the Liberty crew insist that Chief Communications Technician Harold J. Thompson, US Navy lied under oath at the US Navy Court of Inquiry?
Why is it that the pretend supporters refuse to clearly and definitively state that the members of the crew did not lie under oath? Is this sworn testimony one of the reasons? | | | | Jefferson Davis | | Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 7:13 am Post subject: |
| Fuck off and DIE you AIPAC apologist. Enough of your spam and what you want.
It's about the crew and families of the Liberty that you don't give a damn about
Fraud. | | | | Cowboy | | Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
Fake American al Jeffie once again gives us diversion by faolse personal attack rather than address the question.
Why is it that the pretend supporters refuse to clearly and definitively state that the members of the crew did not lie under oath? Is this sworn testimony one of the reasons? | | | | Jefferson Davis | | Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 7:35 am Post subject: |
| Whatever Cowkike. Your typical BS. You're a bore and a fraud.  | | | | Cowboy | | Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 7:09 pm Post subject: |
| More diversion by false personal attack from fake American al Jeffie...
Obviously you have reason to fear answering, al Jeffie....
| Quote: | Why is it that the pretend defenders of the Liberty crew insist that Israel intended to quickly sink the Liberty and kill the crew, when the sworn testimony of Liberty crewmembers show that when the Liberty finally identified itself as a US Navy vessel, the Israelis immediately ceased the attack and offered assistance?
Proceedings of the U.S. Navy Court of Inquiry, 18 June 1967
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/uss-liberty/2007/04/27/proceedings-of-the-u-s-navy-court-of-inquiry-18-june-1967.php
Sworn Testimony of Chief Communications Technician Harold J. Thompson, US Navy, Crewmember of the USS Liberty
Pages 88-89
Word was passed again to standby for torpedo attack starboard side and again word went out for signalmen. Once again I told them I could not read flags, but if I could be of service. I was asked to report to the bridge, which I did. When I got up there, Signalman David was attempting to rig a hand light. I assisted him. We went to the starboard wing of the bridge and one torpedo boat was making a run straight at us off the starboard beam while the other two stood off. At the Captain;s directions, David sent, "US Naval Ship" "US Naval Ship". When they were about 500 yards off, the torpedo boat turned astern and came up on the stern on the starboard side and flashed, "Do you need help?"
Q. Was this before the torpedo hit?
A. This was after the torpedo hit us, and we were surprised by the attack. The Captain gave us word. He said, "no, thank you." We sent this back to the boat, and our steering was somewhat erratic and they came up on the port side then. David went across, I followed him, and saw on the last part of that message, David said, "Do you want us to standby?" I passed this word to the Captain. He said, "no, thank you." We sent this to the patrol boat. They came up along port side, I say roughly 100 yards off, flashed "good luck" and dropped astern along with the other two which had come up to the stern, to a mile or a mile and a half back, just out of sight. Then they made one high speed run directly astern and somewhere between a quarter and a half mile back mad a u-turn and disappeared. That was the last we saw of them. Shortly afterwards, an Israeli helicopter came, hovered off the bridge and tried to hand signal us, and dropped a note on the forecastle which was brought to the bridge...
Why is it?
Notice that the ship identification from the Liberty to the Israeli boats was done with signal lights, and not radio. The only people who knew about the communication were the Israelis on the boats and a few crewmembers on the Liberty. The Israelis could instead have sunk the Liberty with all hands with no record of the Liberty having identified itself - if that had really been their intent.
Or do the pretend defenders of the Liberty crew insist that Chief Communications Technician Harold J. Thompson, US Navy lied under oath at the US Navy Court of Inquiry?
Why is it that the pretend supporters refuse to clearly and definitively state that the members of the crew did not lie under oath? Is this sworn testimony one of the reasons? | | | | | Jefferson Davis | | Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:02 pm Post subject: |
| Pissing on the graves of the USS Liberty dead on the Fourth of July. Spamming and questioning their integrity, avoiding their and their families' legitimate grievances and defending Israel's attack and their murders above all.
Way to go Mr. AIPAC. Israel is so proud of you.
You are what you have always been. | | | | Cowboy | | Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 7:48 am Post subject: |
| I am not pissing on anything but your bullshit diversion.
You are obviously afraid to support the crewmembers' testimony.
Why is it that the pretend defenders of the Liberty crew insist that Israel intended to quickly sink the Liberty and kill the crew, when the sworn testimony of Liberty crewmembers show that when the Liberty finally identified itself as a US Navy vessel, the Israelis immediately ceased the attack and offered assistance?
Proceedings of the U.S. Navy Court of Inquiry, 18 June 1967
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/uss-liberty/2007/04/27/proceedings-of-the-u-s-navy-court-of-inquiry-18-june-1967.php
Sworn Testimony of Chief Communications Technician Harold J. Thompson, US Navy, Crewmember of the USS Liberty
Pages 88-89
Word was passed again to standby for torpedo attack starboard side and again word went out for signalmen. Once again I told them I could not read flags, but if I could be of service. I was asked to report to the bridge, which I did. When I got up there, Signalman David was attempting to rig a hand light. I assisted him. We went to the starboard wing of the bridge and one torpedo boat was making a run straight at us off the starboard beam while the other two stood off. At the Captain;s directions, David sent, "US Naval Ship" "US Naval Ship". When they were about 500 yards off, the torpedo boat turned astern and came up on the stern on the starboard side and flashed, "Do you need help?"
Q. Was this before the torpedo hit?
A. This was after the torpedo hit us, and we were surprised by the attack. The Captain gave us word. He said, "no, thank you." We sent this back to the boat, and our steering was somewhat erratic and they came up on the port side then. David went across, I followed him, and saw on the last part of that message, David said, "Do you want us to standby?" I passed this word to the Captain. He said, "no, thank you." We sent this to the patrol boat. They came up along port side, I say roughly 100 yards off, flashed "good luck" and dropped astern along with the other two which had come up to the stern, to a mile or a mile and a half back, just out of sight. Then they made one high speed run directly astern and somewhere between a quarter and a half mile back mad a u-turn and disappeared. That was the last we saw of them. Shortly afterwards, an Israeli helicopter came, hovered off the bridge and tried to hand signal us, and dropped a note on the forecastle which was brought to the bridge...
Why is it?
Notice that the ship identification from the Liberty to the Israeli boats was done with signal lights, and not radio. The only people who knew about the communication were the Israelis on the boats and a few crewmembers on the Liberty. The Israelis could instead have sunk the Liberty with all hands with no record of the Liberty having identified itself - if that had really been their intent.
Or do the pretend defenders of the Liberty crew insist that Chief Communications Technician Harold J. Thompson, US Navy lied under oath at the US Navy Court of Inquiry?
Why is it that the pretend supporters refuse to clearly and definitively state that the members of the crew did not lie under oath? Is this sworn testimony one of the reasons? | | | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |
