| Author | Message | | Jefferson Davis | | Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 7:23 pm Post subject: |
| | Quote: | | What I "expose" is the hypocrisy of the Liberty conspiracists. |
All you expose is your own ignorance and blind loyalty to Israel along with the usual immorality and total disrespect for justice the combinations bring out. | |  | | funglefoot | | Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 6:37 pm Post subject: |
| | CB wrote: | | It is ridiculous to pretend that there is no such thing as 'friendly fire', or that it only comes from Israelis. |
I am sure you can trot out hundreds of friendly fire incidents.
I only want ONE... 
ONE that is equal in most respects to the Liberty.
ONE where the target was under aerial surveillance for 8 hours.
ONE where the target was accurately identified but subsequently lost through stupidity and recklessness.
ONE where the target was 'mistakenly' attacked for 75 minutes.
ONE where the target was 'mistakenly' attacked by both sea and air.
ONE where the target offered no resistance.
ONE where the target bore her hull identification code clearly on her bows.
ONE where the target flew two subsequent flags of her nationality.
ONE who looked uniquely 'like a lobster' with aerials, antennae and satellite dishes.
ONE who was sailing at a speed well under a fraction of that estimated by her attackers.
ONE who was so completely unlike her supposed 'double' the El Quseir.
ONE who was sailing alone in an arena where the attacker enjoyed complete domination.
ONE where the attacker had absolutely unlimited opportunity to make close fly-bys to establish identity.
ONE who made no attempt at evasion or disguise.
ONE who was not in or near a theatre of battle or scene of conflict.
I am sure a competent military historian like yourself can come up with something that fits 'the bill of goods'. Lets sort this out on equal terms. You go and find some precedents quite like the Liberty incident and then we can discuss 'friendly fire'. But I bet you can't. I've whipped you once and I can whip you again.
Mistake of fact is not a defense in law.
Cowboy declines to debate on equal terms...  | | | | funglefoot | | Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 6:36 am Post subject: |
| | Any raise on my offer to debate on equal terms? Going once, going twice, going three times....GONE! We're all done then. Israel is convicted of murder, malicious wounding and destruction of property. A defense of 'mistaken identity' is not valid in law. No one has the stomach to defend Israel any further. The defense of the indefensible has become unsustainable. Justice has been done. | | | | Jefferson Davis | | Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 7:46 am Post subject: |
| Penalty phase to be decided at a later hearing. Character witnesses may be offered if such can ever be found.
So mote it be. | | | | funglefoot | | Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:54 pm Post subject: |
| | cowgoebbels wrote: | C.I.A. report June 13, 1967 no malice; attack a mistake
Report by Clark Clifford July 18, 1967 no evidence ship was known to be American
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence 1979/1981 no merit to claims attack was intentional
National Security Agency 1981 Mistaken identity
House Armed Services Cmtee 1991/1992 No support for claims attack was intentiona | l
ACCORDING TO REAR ADMIRAL MERLIN STARING, A FORMER JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL OF THE US NAVY NONE OF THE ABOVE IS A US GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATION INTO THE ATTACK ON THE LIBERTY.
THE ADMIRAL SAYS..."WE WERE VERY PLEASED TO, FINALLY TO HAVE THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY RESPONDING TO THE CONGRESS AND SAYING THE ONLY US GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATION OF THE LIBERTY ATTACK WAS THE US NAVY COURT OF INQUIRY IN 1967".
THE DEPT OF THE NAVY CONFIRMED [MARCH 2005] TO ROB SIMMONDS, A MEMBER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, THAT THE ONLY INVESTIGATION INTO THE USS LIBERTY ATTACK WAS CONDUCTED BY THE NAVY COURT OF INQUIRY.
Watch WING TV - ISRAEL'S DELIBERATE ATTACK ON THE U.S.S. LIBERTY
http://69.28.73.17/documentaries.html | | | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk | 
