| Author | Message | | funglefoot | | Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 9:48 am Post subject: The USS Liberty and the onus of proof! |
| I think we have been putting the cart in front of the horse. It is obviously not for the Liberty sympathizers to prove that the attack on the Liberty was intentional. The fact of the attack cannot be denied. Therefore the onus rests on the Israeli sympathizers to prove that the attack was accidental, a case of mistaken identity or whatever. With the backing of my good friend Rabbi Zakheim I hereby promise to pay the sum of $3,000,000,000,000 (three trillion dollars) to any individual regardless of nationality, race, religion or creed who can prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that the attack on the Liberty was an accident. I also have a side bet with my bookmaker, for a much more modest sum, that no one will take up this challenge. By this I mean no one will make a serious effort to prove, using Israeli military documents, that the attack was an accident. Go on Ilana and Half Brain. SURPRISE ME! Any other Israeli-firsters who may be lurking in the shadows you are also most welcome to have a go. | |  | | Ilana_Halevy | | Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 9:53 am Post subject: |
| | Quote: | | The fact of the attack cannot be denied. | 17 out of 20 Bradleys destroyed in Guld war were dueto friendly fire. FACT. | |  | | Ilana_Halevy | | Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 9:55 am Post subject: |
| | Quote: | | With the backing of my good friend Rabbi Zakheim I hereby promise to pay the sum of $3,000,000,000,000 (three trillion dollars) to any individual regardless of nationality, race, religion or creed who can prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that the attack on the Liberty was an accident. | You are a mooslime degenerate, because u never heared about presumption of innocence. | |  | | funglefoot | | Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:02 am Post subject: |
| | You are an ignoramus. Have you never heard that the onus of proof shifts to the Defence once the act has been admitted? Your jurisprudence is just as shit as your ESL. But full marks for trying Ilana. | |  | | funglefoot | | Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:22 am Post subject: |
| | Quote: | | You are an ignoramus. | Sorry Ilana, my mistake. You are not an ignoramus. Correction. You are an IGNORANUS, ie a dumb arsehole. No offence intended.  | |  | | DanielDives | | Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:25 am Post subject: |
| Q: 17 out of 20 Bradleys destroyed in Guld war were dueto friendly fire. FACT. R: I didn't know the IDF participated in the Gulf Wars... But this is your proof beyond reasonable duobt Israel's attack on the USS Liberty was an hour-long 'accident?' Will not do, missy. | |  | | funglefoot | | Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:21 am Post subject: |
| | ilana wrote: | | 17 out of 20 Bradleys destroyed in Guld war were dueto friendly fire. FACT. | FACT? Recorded where? First or second Gulf War? Am I supposed to accept this nugget of information as 22 carat gold? | |  | | DanielDives | | Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:33 am Post subject: |
| FF, Q: FACT? Recorded where? First or second Gulf War? Am I supposed to accept this nugget of information as 22 carat gold? R: Don't fall for the usual distraction. Let IH prove, using Il mill docs, that the Israeli Military Forces 'accidentally' attcked the USS Liberty for over an hour without recognizing her as a US Naval vessel. | |  | | funglefoot | | Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:48 am Post subject: |
|  | |  | | Ilana_Halevy | | Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 12:03 pm Post subject: |
| | Quote: | Q: 17 out of 20 Bradleys destroyed in Guld war were dueto friendly fire. FACT. R: I didn't know the IDF participated in the Gulf Wars... | Degenerate, 17 Bradleys were destroyed by US fire. | Quote: | | But this is your proof beyond reasonable duobt Israel's attack on the USS Liberty was an hour-long 'accident?' | Degenerate, in civilized coutries, unlike your Mooslime masters, there is principle of presumptio of innocence. YOU should prove that attack was deliberate. But you cant find even the motive. Scum. | Quote: | | FACT? Recorded where? First or second Gulf War? Am I supposed to accept this nugget of information as 22 carat gold? | Fingalfilth, in first Gulf war. Source: Encyclopedia of Modern US Military Weapons (Col. Tomothy M.Laur and Steven L.Llanso) | |  | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |