| Author | Message | | Von Curtis | | Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 5:03 am Post subject: Sovietism by Stealth |
| Sovietism by Stealth
the undermining of a nation and its institutions from within
http://centurean2.wordpress.com/2009/06/06/brown-said-today-he-wont-be-distracted-from-what-he-has-to-do-that-should-fill-us-with-fear-fabians-aiding-communist-advance/
And what is the basic reality shared by all brands of Socialists?
They all believe in the centralisation of power; they all advance the idea that the power of Government should be increased.
Every increase in the power of Government is at the expense of the individual, who, as he loses not only power to make decisions for himself, but also loses his sense of personal responsibility, tends to become more and more satisfied to depend upon the State. It is the undermining of the individual’s belief in the basic principle of true freedom and the personal responsibility which goes with it, that has had such a deadly “softening up” effect on the peoples of the non-Communist world, and thus seriously lowered their resistance to the Communist challenge.
there is such a thing as a silent revolution, the undermining of a nation and its institutions from within. This is what the Fabian Socialists set out to accomplish.
The essence of the Fabian’s Soviet-by-Stealth programme was to exploit the natural tendency of all politicians, irrespective of label, to concentrate power. The Fabians set about influencing all politicians to support legislation which would so start centralising power that a process of delegation of power to a bureaucracy would become inevitable. Once the bureaucracy was empowered to make regulations and decrees having the force of law, responsible Parliamentary Government would be undermined, and the traditional Constitutional safeguards of the individual’s rights destroyed.
In other words, the Fabians set out deliberately to pervert the Parliamentary system.
THE KEY ROLE OF J. M. KEYNES
Although it is generally admitted that the economic and financial theories of the late Baron J. M. Keynes have had a tremendous impact in all Western nations, particularly the nations of the British Commonwealth, and the U.S.A., it is an astonishing fact that most supporters of the free-enterprise, private ownership economic system, regard Keynes as a “capitalist economist” whose work was primarily concerned with economic and financial adjustments which would have as much as possible of the capitalist system. The truth about Keynes and his vital contribution to the world-wide revolution is so contrary to the fable about him being a “capitalist economist,” that, in considering Keynes and his ideas, we are presented with yet another frightening example of how revolutionaries can advance behind a smokescreen of respectability.
During the first World War Keynes sought to keep himself out of the firing lines by a technique used by many other young Socialist radicals: he sought an appointment to a Government service which might exempt him from military duty. But he was eventually forced to file as a conscientious objector and was criticised by his mother for his unpatriotic stand.
Following the war, Keynes was numbered amongst those Socialists who regarded the Bolsheviks as ‘”progressives."
Like many Socialists, Keynes was also a hypocrite.
The double-standards of the Fabian Socialists are similar to those of the Communist Commissars, who live in luxury in the “‘classless society”!
Fascists and Nazis Use Fabians
It is important to note that the totalitarian philosophy underlying Keynesian theories made them acceptable to both the Fascists and the Nazis.
Not only was Fabian Socialist Keynes accepted in Fascist Italy; he was also welcomed in Nazi Germany. Hitler frankly admitted the basic similarities between National Socialism and Communism, while the chief speaker at the Fabian International Bureau’s Conference on March 15th, 1942, made the comment that
“. . . there is not much difference between the basic economic techniques of Socialism and Nazism.”
Students of the use of Communism, Nazism and Fascism cannot help be struck by the fact that all three were revolutionary movements which were directed by individuals with Socialist backgrounds. It is true that Nazis and Fascists fought bitterly against Communists, but they were in fact battling for the same type of mind. A number of observers have drawn attention to the fact that many German Communists became Nazis, while after the war many Nazis found no difficulty in becoming Communists.
The American writer, John T. Flynn, in his penetrating examination of the “”creeping revolution” in the U.S.A., The Road Ahead, states “. . . the line between Fascism and Fabian Socialism is very thin. Fabian Socialism is the dream. Fascism is Fabian Socialism plus the inevitable dictator.”
It is a fact of the greatest historical significance that Keynesian Social economics, now so widely accepted in the non-Communist world, were accepted by both the Nazis and the Fascists, and are the Fabian method of weakening the foundations of the free-enterprise system and forcing it in the direction which the Communists claim leads ‘”inevitably” towards Communism.
International Monetary Fund serves Communist Program
In view of the fact that J. M. Keynes’ economic teachings and their application are furthering the Communist advance, not halting it, we must also examine closely why Harry Dexter White, the top Communist agent, and his Communist associates worked so closely and harmoniously with Keynes to create the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.
Foreign Aid” program which the U.S.A. and other Western nations have in fact adopted in the post-war years, it is clear that he realised that Keynesian-Fabianism could, through the appropriate international financial machinery, advance the Communist objective much more effectively than could the policies of the Marxist-Leninists.
The Reality of Socialism
The underlying philosophy of all Socialist policies, whether advanced by the Marxist-Leninists, the Fabians, or any other brand of Socialists, is collectivist, reactionary, and opposed to the freedom of the individual. All central planners fear individual freedom, because no one can predict how the individual is going to use his freedom.
Central planning requires that planners have effective control of all aspects of human activity. The exercising of freedom by the individual is essentially a creative and spiritual activity.
Self-development depends not only on freedom of choice,
but the acceptance of personal responsibility for the choices made.
Now the basis of true freedom is economic freedom. The widespread ownership of private property, decentralised and genuine competitive free enterprise, the inheritance of any form of property or money from one’s forebears, the obtaining of dividends from investments , and the making of financial profits are all detested by the Socialists.
The Fabian Keynes and his followers have done even more than the Marxist-Leninists to make “”profit motive” a dirty term. And their effect has been so pervading that even private businessmen feel inhibited against making a positive defence of the profit principle. The Fabians have also joined with the Communists in attacking the inheritance principle. The attack on the inheritance principle was included in Marx’s ten steps in The Communist Manifesto. Along with Marx, the Fabians have claimed that the inheritance principle can be attacked by high taxation and heavy death duties.
According to Keynesian economics, the economy should be increasingly geared to Government investment for ‘”social purposes”, the “’social purposes” to be decided, not by the free choice of individuals, but by Government planners. | |  | | Cowboy | | Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 5:37 am Post subject: |
| | Quote: | | Now the basis of true freedom is economic freedom. The widespread ownership of private property, decentralised and genuine competitive free enterprise, the inheritance of any form of property or money from one’s forebears, the obtaining of dividends from investments , and the making of financial profits are all detested by the Socialists. | | | | | DanielDives | | Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 5:54 am Post subject: |
| | Whatever happened to your non-government intervention free-markets? | | | | Von Curtis | | Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 12:03 am Post subject: Socialist World government |
| http://centurean2.wordpress.com/2009/06/07/1992-earth-summit-de-population-bank-scams-wrecking-the-western-world-etc-nwo/
Socialist World government
The Communist system in Russia was a “British experiment” designed ultimately to become the Fabian Socialist model for the British takeover of the World through the UN and EU. The British plan to takeover the World and bring in a “New World Order” began with the teachings of John Ruskin and Cecil Rhodes at Oxford University.
Rhodes in one of his wills in 1877 left his vast fortune to Lord Nathan Rothschild as trustee to set up the Rhodes Scholarship Program at Oxford to indoctrinate promising young graduates for the purpose, and also establish a secret society [Royal Institute of International Affairs RIIA, which branched into the Round Table, the Bilderbergers, the CFR, the Trilateral, etc] for leading business and banking leaders around the World who would work for the City to bring in their Socialist World government. | | | | Cowboy | | Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:20 am Post subject: |
| | Quote: |
Whatever happened to your non-government intervention free-markets? |
Democrats socialists. | | | | dzh | | Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 8:35 am Post subject: |
| | You people will never be happy. | | | | Von Curtis | | Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:07 am Post subject: NONSENSE |
| Lord Nicholas Stern told us tonight on TV that Australia must bring in a cut of 25% in carbon emissions because Australia is one of the big polluters of the world per capita. If Australia doesn't lead the way before climate change talks in Copenhagen he said it does not set a good precedent for the world and we haven't got much time left to stop catastophic climate change.
He looked and sounded communist.
A lot of Australians don't believe in carbon trading and won't accept it - so there Lord Muck ! | | | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |
