War Without End Forum Index

War Without End

The global war against terror, news about the illegal invasion of Iraq, the corporate puppet presidents, the war criminal Tony Blair, September 11th 2001, the USS Liberty and New World Order crimes against humanity.

Zionist Jew Lord Levy Arrested for Second Time

War Without End Forum Index -> UK and Europe
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
Alpha
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:59 pm    Post subject: Zionist Jew Lord Levy Arrested for Second Time

Lord Levy arrested for second time (this is the bastard that paid for Blair to poodle along with the war for Israel in Iraq):

By FT reporters

Published: January 30 2007 17:34 | Last updated: January 30 2007 17:42

Lord Levy, Tony Blair’s chief personal fundraiser, has been arrested for a second time in the cash-for-honours police inquiry, it has emerged.

Police sources said that the peer had been arrested on Tuesday on suspicion of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.

Lord Levy was arrested when he turned up voluntarily at a police station to have his bail terms renewed. He has not been charged.

This was the third time that Lord Levy had returned to the police to have his bail terms renewed since his first arrest on July 12 last year in connection with the 1925 honours act and the 2001 Political Parties, Elections and Referendums act.

Lord Levy’s spokesman could not immediately be reached for comment.

The latest twist in a police inquiry into allegations that Tony Blair sought to reward wealthy businessmen who lent the party millions of pounds in loans by nominating them for peerages follows the arrest of Ruth Turner, Mr Blair’s director of government relations and a senior gatekeeper, on January 19.

Ms Turner was arrested on suspicion of perverting the course of justice and in connection with alleged offences under the 1925 honours act. She was later released without charge and bailed pending further inquiries. It was the third time police had quizzed her.

As well as looking into possible breaches of electoral laws and whether honours have been sold illegally, detectives are seeking to establish whether any evidence has been witheld or destroyed.

Scotland Yard said at the time that, as a result, “additional investigation” would be required and the inquiry could run into March before the police send a file to the Crown Prosecution Service. Ms Turner was the first salaried government official to be arrested as part of the 10-month investigation.

Ms Turner and Lord Levy, like all those in the affair, have denied any wrongdoing.
Alpha
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:00 pm    Post subject:

Honours police arrest Lord Levy
Labour's chief fundraiser Lord Levy has been arrested by police investigating cash-for-honours allegations.
He returned to a police station on bail following his arrest last year, and was arrested on suspicion of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.

Lord Levy, a close ally of Tony Blair, was bailed pending further enquiries.

Police are investigating whether money was donated to political parties in exchange for peerages - all those involved deny any wrongdoing.







Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/uk_politics/6314881.stm
Alpha
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:05 pm    Post subject: Friends of Tony Blair (click on the Lord Levy link)

http://www.red-star-research.org.uk/subframe1.html
Alpha
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:41 pm    Post subject:

Prosecutors never were able to completely get the evidence to nail Capone and other mafia bosses, but they went down all the same, COW JEW BOY.. Here is another for you:

A Damning Witness
Former White House spokesman Ari Fleischer took the stand at the Scooter Libby trial, and proved a surprisingly effective witness for the prosecution.
WEB EXCLUSIVE
By Michael Isikoff
Newsweek
Updated: 5:17 p.m. PT Jan 29, 2007
Jan. 29, 2007 - Ari Fleischer may turn out to be a stronger—and more credible—witness than he was a White House press secretary.

During several hours on the witness stand in the I. Lewis (Scooter) Libby Jr. perjury and obstruction trial Monday, President Bush’s former chief spokesman was cool, unruffled, chatty and at times combative—especially when he underwent hostile cross-examination from one of Libby’s lawyers. But he stuck to his story and, in the process, delivered what may have been the most damaging testimony yet against Vice President Dick Cheney’s former chief of staff.

Fleischer described with damning new details a lunch he had with Libby in the White House mess on July 7, 2003, just as the controversy over the president’s State of the Union claim that Iraq had sought to buy uranium in Africa was spreading into a major Washington firestorm.

During that lunch, Fleischer said, Libby was anxious to rebut criticism by former ambassador Joseph Wilson. In a New York Times op-ed piece, Wilson had written that he had been dispatched on a CIA mission to Niger to check out the uranium claim in 2002 at the instigation of Cheney’s office and reported back there was nothing to the story.

As Fleischer related the story to the jury, Libby told him: “The vice president did not send Mr. Wilson. Ambassador Wilson was sent by his wife. She works for the CIA.” Libby then told him which part of the CIA employed her. “He said his wife works at the Counter-Proliferation Division. I think he told me her name,” Fleischer testified. Libby added: “This is hush-hush, this is on the Q.T. Not very many people know about this.”

Fleischer then described his reaction. “That was news to me. That was the first time I ever heard it. I thought it was kind of odd. ” Fleischer took from Libby’s disclosure that the vice president’s top aide had passed along a “nugget” that undermined the credibility of both Wilson—by then a nettlesome public critic of the White House—and the CIA. “My thought was that what I was hearing was there was nepotism at the CIA,” he said.


The Fleischer testimony, if believed by the jury, significantly bolsters prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald’s case. Libby is charged with lying in a federal grand jury probe triggered by the disclosure in the media the following week that Wilson’s wife worked at the CIA—information that some White House officials, including Fleischer, had used to try to discredit Wilson. Libby, according to the indictment against him, falsely told the FBI and a federal grand jury not only that he had nothing to do with disclosing Valerie Plame Wilson’s identity to the press. He also testified that NBC “Meet the Press” host Tim Russert told him about Wilson’s wife working at the CIA in a conversation three days after his lunch with Fleischer and that he was surprised and “taken aback” to learn the information.

One line of Libby’s defense was that the information about Wilson’s wife was so insignificant to him that it is perfectly understandable that he might honestly be confused about where and when he learned it. Indeed, Libby’s lawyers have had some success thus far in demonstrating that other government witnesses—most notably former CIA official Bob Grenier—were also confused about when they had conversations about Wilson’s wife.

But one particular detail of Fleischer’s testimony may be significant. Libby had passed along that Wilson’s wife worked in the Counter-Proliferation Division of the CIA, Fleischer said. That division is located in the Directorate of Operations, the agency’s clandestine wing—not its analytic branch. That’s important, because it means the information about Wilson’s wife might have been viewed as especially sensitive—one possible reason that explains why Libby described it as “hush-hush,” even though Fleischer said he had no idea that her status at the agency was classified.

Fleischer later testified that a few days later, he himself was aboard Air Force One on a trip to Africa when presidential counselor Dan Bartlett was “venting” while reading a document about Wilson’s mission. Bartlett said he couldn’t believe the press was saying the vice president had sent Wilson to Africa. “His wife sent him. She works at the CIA,” Bartlett said, according to Fleischer’s account. When Fleischer heard this, he said, he remembered his earlier conversation with Libby. “It was information I clearly knew and that I had heard before,” Fleischer said.


Later that day, Fleischer decided to pass the information along to two reporters on the Africa trip: NBC correspondent David Gregory and then-Time magazine correspondent John Dickerson. (Gregory so far has declined to comment. But Dickerson, sitting in the courtroom and now covering the trial for the online magazine Slate, disputed this aspect of Fleischer’s account. Dickerson says Fleischer suggested that he look into who sent Wilson to Africa, but maintains “he didn’t tell me about the wife.”)

William Jeffress, one of Libby’s lawyers, was unable to shake Fleischer during a lengthy and at times combative cross-examination. Fleischer, looking directly at the jury and appearing at ease, chatted about White House-press relations and how reporters were constantly demanding that he back up what he was saying. But he consistently refused to budge from his story or acknowledge that he might have been mistaken about what Libby told him. Jeffress hammered away at Fleischer’s immunity agreement with prosecutors, getting the witness to admit that he originally refused, on the advice of his lawyer, to answer any questions in prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald’s probe and only finally did so after receiving a grant of immunity.

Asked why he thought he needed immunity, Fleischer testified that after learning that a criminal investigation had been launched into the disclosure of Plame’s employment, “I was absolutely horrified. I remember thinking, ‘Oh my God, did I play a role in somehow outing a CIA officer?’”

While Fleischer said he did not believe he had done anything wrong, he was concerned that “others” might view it differently and he could end up facing criminal charges. But when Jeffress tried to get him to testify about conversations he had with his lawyers, Fleischer declined, reminding Libby’s lawyer of the sanctity of the attorney-client privilege.

URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16877079/site/newsweek/
dogzzz3
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:39 pm    Post subject: Conspiracy?

Let me get this clear. Lord Levy was arrested for CONSPIRACY to pervert the course of justice?

Nah, cannot be true, after all, The government and their many official and unofficial shills keep telling us that there are no such thing as government conspiracies!

So I guess the Metropolitan police are tin-hat conspiracy theorists now too, eh?

ROFLMAO!!!!

Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing
Poseidon
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:25 pm    Post subject: Levy - Friends of Blair

Lord Levy is Blair's handler, the intermediary between Blair and the Zionist Mafia who issue him with his orders. Prime Ministers and Presidents can be "pretty straight kind of guys", e.g. electric guitar-playing types, before they take office, and then we have the well-documented fact of leaders taking unpopular action that does nobody any good apart from Organized Jewry, Israel and the Rothschild-Bronfman crime syndicate.

There are outlandish theories such as reptoids and crypto-Jews, which do not have evidence to support them, but cannot be conclusively ruled out. I suspect the real reason for each official leader's subservience to the crooked international cabal is a combination of blackmail and bribery. Israel has nukes which can be used for blackmail - along with polonium-210 as we saw in the Litvinenko case. Minor forms of blackmail such as Caplin washing out Cherie's toxins or Blair in a compromising position with Mandelson could also be employed. The £4 million Blair received for the Iraq war had to be laundered on the Connaught Square house and two Bristol flats.

But Blair's overriding consideration is probably that all the lies, deceptions and fake versions of history, such as fictional accounts of WWII and claims that "Muslims" did 9/11, 7/7, etc, are the only barrier between Blair and a lynch mob. Those running for office clearly have little idea of what they are letting themselves in for. Upon initiation, they realise that the whole power structure is based on a flimsy house of cards, and are forced to go along with the chicanery in order to save their own skins.

My file of Zionist crimes at:

http://www.takeourworldback.com/zionistcrimes.htm

...aims to put everything in perspective. At nearly 200 KB and growing, there are still many omitted Zionist crimes, and it would take something the size of Encyclopaedia Britannica to even come close to fitting everything in.

For those who don't like my take, this link:

http://www.iamthewitness.com/ZionistControlOfBritain.html

...is a good summary of Zionist control of Britain. My file links to that and much more...

But it is great to see all these crackpot conspiracy theories such as "ricin", a "cyanide bomb", a "liquid explosives" plot, a "novel form of terrorism" that would not lead to mass casualties. That last one has turned out to be a "kidnap plot", but maybe the next one will involve water pistols and cap guns. LOL!
Veracity
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:53 pm    Post subject:

Call to end cash-for-honours probe

Press Association
Wednesday January 31, 2007 10:28 AM


The police investigation into cash-for-honours allegations should be brought to a conclusion because it is damaging the political system, a senior Labour MP has said.

The call from the chairman of the Commons public administration committee, Tony Wright, came after Prime Minister Tony Blair's personal fundraiser Lord Levy was arrested for a second time on Tuesday.

Lord Levy was released without charge after about four hours of questioning on suspicion of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. He issued a statement denying any wrongdoing.

His arrest led to speculation that the focus of the 10-month police inquiry is shifting from allegations of the sale of honours to suspicions of a cover-up.

It came within a fortnight of the arrest of Mr Blair's close aide Ruth Turner on suspicion of perverting the course of justice. She too was freed on bail and has denied doing anything wrong.

The Times reports that a third unnamed Downing Street aide may be about to face further questioning under caution.

But Dr Wright last night questioned the police decision to move outside the original investigation into alleged breaches of the 1925 Honours (Prevention of Abuses) Act.

He said: "It is odd that it goes on and on. I think there is a desire on all sides to try to get this over with. We want the investigation to come to a conclusion.

"The police said, when they started last March, it would all be over by September, then it was going to be October, then Christmas. Now it's January.

"They started off with a very clear focus on two offences that they were after, indeed they were quite explicit at that point that they were not going to go wandering off into the undergrowth, looking for other kinds of things. I don't know, I can only speculate, as other people are doing. The focus seems to have moved from that central territory into this adjacent territory."

_____________________________________________________________

Dr Wright seems to think that Perverting the course of Justice is an adjacent territory. Perhaps if Lord Levy had been totally honest about the Cash for Honours probe, he wouldn't have been under suspicion of being a lying cunt.
smallaxe
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:01 pm    Post subject:

Quote:
The police investigation into cash-for-honours allegations should be brought to a conclusion because it is damaging the political system, a senior Labour MP has said.
The damage to the political system was carried out by lying Blair and our supine parliament aided and abetted by our craven press who went along with the lies. As usual the blockhead MP has it back to front. Let's hope this leads to the impeachment of Blair and that it happens in an open court of law with a jury made up of the British public. Such measures can only strengthen our political system.
Veracity
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:04 pm    Post subject:

Spot on and 10/10 for observation....... Smallaxe!
Alpha
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:26 pm    Post subject:

Saw the following article posted on page 1 of the comments section of the Huffingtonpost.com blog entry which is linked after it below:


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/01/31/nlevy31.xml

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/01/30/tony-blairs-chief-fundra_n_40049.html
 

Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next

War Without End Forum Index -> UK and Europe
All times are GMT
©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk
Bookmark and Share
Social Links:  Homeowner Association Software  Appliances Reno NV  America Hijacked  Cash System X Review  300 Internet Marketers Review  300 Internet Marketers
www.1st-amendment.net Real Free Speech Web Hosting
This web site is Hosted Free by: www.1st-Amendment.net