| Author | Message | | dangerousdna | | Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2003 5:28 am Post subject: The Oil Racket and Greater Israel |
| >Subject: The Oil Racket and Greater Israel-- EXCELLENT Analysis
>Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 23:01:26 EST
>
>The Oil Racket and Greater Israel
>
>By
>Eduardo
>
>http://reportersnotebook.com/newforum/indexforum.html
>
>February 28, 2003
>
>
>"The Jews might have had Uganda, Madagascar and other places for the
>establishment of a Jewish Fatherland, but they want absolutely nothing
>except
>Palestine: not because the Dead Sea water by evaporation can produce five
>trillion dollars worth of metaloids and powdered metal; not because the
>sub-soil of Palestine contains twenty times more petroleum than all the
>combined reserves of the two Americas {this was first thought to be a lie,
>but it actually referred to Greater Israel}; but because Palestine is the
>crossroads of Europe, Asia and Africa, because Palestine constitutes the
>veritable center of world political power, the strategic center for world
>control." - Dr. Nahum Goldman, former President of the World Jewish
>Congress
>
>
>The American raison d'être for war against Iraq is being publicized as a
>battle against terrorists and against nations that are affiliated with
>terrorist acts. The real reason has very little to do with terrorism or any
>other "threats" against the United States. We will understand that the
>truth
>behind this war campaign has everything to do with the ideal for a greater
>Israel and its growing manipulation of oil interests. As we draw closer to
>war, the State propaganda has become very intense. Nevertheless, officials
>are having great difficulty finding evidence against Saddam Hussein.
>
>
>"In their search for hidden Iraqi arms, U.N. inspectors have so far faced
>little conflict, have found little evidence and have received little
>outside
>intelligence to guide them, said one inspector. 'We haven't found an iota
>of
>concealed material yet,' the inspector said on condition of anonymity," -
>Los
>Angeles Times - December 31, 2002
>
>
>We will soon learn that Israel has more at stake against Iraq than any
>other
>nation. Certainly, their vast intelligence (i.e. Mossad) would provide any
>evidence, no matter how small, for convincing America that it should go to
>war with Iraq. Hence, the lack of "outside intelligence" is simply because
>there is no evidence. From the same article, we learn that United Nation
>inspectors have meticulously inspected the Iraqi government.
>
>
>"But the inspectors' roster of frustrations is long. There are 110 U.N.
>weapons experts in Iraq, 100 searching for chemical and biological weapons
>and 10 looking for evidence of a nuclear program. Their mission is nearly
>impossible - trying to find suspected caches of material or documents in a
>country about the size of California." (However, the number of UN agents
>could have been increased dramatically. Even with this number in a country
>of
>this size, any sophisticated program of weapon development could be easily
>located.)
>
>
>"Their work is relentless - sometimes the different teams conduct seven
>inspections a day, which means early wake-up calls, long drives and intense
>searches. Monday was that kind of day as inspectors made seven visits,
>including one to a water-purification plant and one to a missile factory."
>
>
> "To keep their plans secret from wiretaps, moles or eavesdropping
>devices,
>inspectors operate like spies, passing notes about the day's plans rather
>than speaking aloud, and driving their U.N. jeeps in circles to confound
>those trying to determine their destination."
>
>
>With no real evidence, the Jewish media rely on ad hominems for convincing
>the American public that Saddam Hussein must somehow have weapons of mass
>destruction. Every UN report has provided virtually no evidence against
>Iraq
>of the existence of nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons. Why would the
>United States government ignore other rogue nations posing a far more
>urgent
>threat arising from illegal weapons of mass destruction? Why is the US
>ignoring the dangerous nuclear confrontation between India and Pakistan and
>concentrating on Iraq? Why has the US chosen "diplomacy" with a
>recalcitrant
>nation of North Korea instead of Iraq? The answer has everything to do with
>the United States' foreign policy and its present economy. There is no
>question the US foreign policy is being dictated by Israel. One has to
>wonder
>why American policy is identical to Israel's. Israel's Prime Minister,
>Ariel
>Sharon has stated publicly that after the US government goes to war with
>Iraq, he wants the State Department to attack Iran. Curiously, no response
>has been provided from the Bush's Administration concerning Sharon's
>statement. Researcher and historian, Chris Conole in his article -
>"Superpower Junkie"[1] gives us another impelling reason to our current
>economic woes by declaring our present monetary system is about to
>collapse,
>as any pyramid scheme eventually does. He articulates that wars will bring
>willing dupes into the scheme and draw existing "members" deeper into debt.
>These two components are essential for any pyramid scheme to survive.
>Oxford
>University, Professor David Harvey,[2] a distinguished geographer, echoes
>what Conole has already revealed in that the US government's policy for war
>relates to the US economy and its affliction with the pyramid-debt related
>occurrence of an over-accumulation of capital. Indeed, this problem has
>been
>developing since the early 1970s. The Federal Reserve has tried every
>available means of solving it and sustaining the United States' global
>dominance. As has been in the past, the only remaining, politically viable
>option is war.
>
>
>Israel and its American-Jewish lobby's extraordinary influence over the
>political spectrum of the United States has dictated the governmental
>spending of millions of dollars toward demonizing Saddam Hussein. It is now
>true that the majority of Americans know Hussein as the "Butcher of
>Baghdad."
>Repeatedly, we are told this evil dictator "gassed his own Kurdish people;"
>at Halabja, Iraq. Contrary to this claim however, is the published US Army
>War College report of February 1990. The study entitled - "Iraqi Power & US
>Security in the Middle East" provided clear evidence the Kurds of Halabja
>died as a direct consequence of an Iranian Phosgene gas attack. Another
>extraordinary propaganda lie perpetrated was that the retreating Iraqis set
>blaze to the Kuwaiti oil fields.[3] We now learn from ex-American veterans
>that it was American forces that set fire to these oil wells. We further
>learn that the nation of Kuwait was "slant-drilling" for oil in Iraqi
>territory, stealing Iraqi oil. The American Ambassador, April Glaspie met
>with Saddam Hussein at this time and expressed an interest in improving
>relations with the United States. He was told that the U.S. did not care
>what
>happened in the Gulf or what happened to Kuwait. Certainly, the
>Israel-first
>crowd and the Jewish media don't want you to know about this. Instead, the
>American State Department greatly magnifies any "violation" of United
>Nation
>sanctions against Iraq. However, little is reported of Israel as being, by
>far the greatest world violator of some 68 UN resolutions.[4] Iraq does not
>come close in comparison to the number of UN violations by Israel.
>
>As we watch the war drama unfold, we are presented with an orchestrated
>script from the Jewish controlled Western newsrooms. On one side, pundits
>claim there's enough "evidence" already for justifying a war against Iraq.
>On
>the other side, pundits are appealing that we need to wait to assure that
>Saddam Hussein "comes clean." The framed argument is that both sides are
>actually for war, but it's a question on when to act. However, behind the
>scenes of this mass propaganda, there is a very different story taking
>shape.
>
>
>"I devote my life to the rebirth of the Jewish State, with a Jewish
>majority,
>on both sides of the Jordan." - In 1934 Ze'ev Jabotinsky introduced for his
>youth movement followers the Betar Oath. - "Israeli: A History," by Martin
>Gilbert, p. 76.
>
>
>It is a story that we should be all too familiar with. As Jesus recognized
>and eloquently publicized: "Whereby their fruits we shall know them." And
>it
>is by Canaan's dictate to his sons (the Jews) that we should be well
>informed
>of his Will that commanded - "Five things did Canaan charge his sons: 'Love
>each other (i.e. of this tribe only), love robbery, love lewdness, hate
>your
>masters and never tell the truth.' " -- Pesachis F. 113b. The ensuing facts
>will reveal how Zionist Israel covets the furthest edges of the
>trans-Jordan
>for its vast oil deposits. This may sound unusual to the novice at first.
>Certainly, why should anyone believe this little country; the home of the
>persecuted and "holocaust" Jews desire land that isn't rightfully theirs?
>After all, they want to be left in peace without being victimized by
>"hateful" Muslims, right? If we look back into history and at about the
>time
>the nation of Israel was created, we will begin to understand and recognize
>that Israel is the proverbial wolf dressed in sheep's clothing. We will
>find
>that the Zionist plan for Eretz Israel, or a greater Israel, was already
>envisioned and planned.
>
>"Before the founding of the state, on the eve of its creation, our main
>interests was self-defense. To a large extent, the creation of the state
>was
>an act of self-defense. . . . Many think that we're still at the same
>stage.
>But now the issue at hand is conquest, not self-defense. As for setting the
>borders--- it's an open-ended matter. In the Bible as well as in our
>history,
>there all kinds of definitions of the country's borders, so there's no real
>limit. No border is absolute. If it's a desert--- it could just as well be
>the other side. If it's sea, it could also be across the sea. The world has
>always been this way. Only the terms have changed. If they should find a
>way
>of reaching other stars, well then, perhaps the whole earth will no longer
>suffice." - David Ben-Gurion (born David Grun) in 1949 stated during one of
>the discussions with his aides. "The First Israelis," By Tom Segev, p.6.
>
>
>Israel is a country with limited natural resources, and has insufficient
>strategic oil reserves as well. Indeed, it is a nation highly dependent on
>foreign aid, especially for financial and military assistance from the
>United
>States. From its conception, in 1948, Israel has always been a troubled and
>controversial nation politically and economically.
>
>Zionists were not satisfied with the land they were dealt from the very
>beginning. They looked at it as a temporary settlement and that they would
>not quit until Eretz Israel was achieved. The Jewish state was born out of
>deceit and illegitimacy.[5],[6] After the Zionists signed the 1947
>armistice
>agreement with its four neighboring nations, Israel immediately violated
>the
>1947 United Nations GA partition plan. It expanded its borders 38 percent
>more than the area allotted to the "Jewish state." Simha Falpan reports
>that
>60 percent of the Israeli soldiers killed in action were found in conquered
>areas designated by the UN to be beyond the "Jewish state."[7]
>
>
>Immediately, after the UN vote to partition Palestine, Menachem Begin, the
>commander of the Irgun and Israel's future Prime Minster, stated publicly:
>
>
>"The Partition of Palestine is illegal. It will never be recognized . . .
>Jerusalem was and will forever be our capital. Eretz Israel will be
>restored
>to the people of Israel. All of it. And for Ever," "The Iron Wall," by Avi
>Shlaim, p. 25.
>
>
>"The acceptance of partition does not commit us to renounce Transjordan.
>One
>does not demand from anybody to live up to his vision. We shall accept a
>state in the boundaries fixed today--but the boundaries of the Zionist
>aspirations are concern of the Jewish people and no external factor will be
>able to limit them." - quote by David Ben-Gurion, "The Birth of Israel:
>Myths
>and Realities", by Simha Falpan, p. 52-53.[8]
>
>
>The Israeli campaign for annexation has never ceased. This explains why
>Israel is a "war" state. Indeed, they have been in a constant state of war
>since their inception. And, Jewish leaders have openly stated that the
>perpetual war will continue until greater Israel has been established.
>
>
>Yigal Allon[9] wrote in article published just before the outbreak of the
>1967 war:
>
>
> "In . . . a new war, we must avoid the historic mistake of the War of
>Independence [1948] . . . and MUST NOT cease fighting until we achieve
>total
>victory, the territorial fulfillment of the Land Of Israel." - Benny
>Morris,
>"Righteous Victims," p. 321.
>
>
>David Ben-Gurion stated to his son Amos in October of 1937:
>
>"not the end, but only the beginning." Its establishment would give a
>"powerful boost to our historic efforts to redeem the country in its
>entirety." For the "Jewish state" would have "outstanding army-- I have no
>doubt that our army will be among the world's outstanding--and so I am
>certain that we won't be constrained from settling in the rest of the
>country, either by mutual agreement and understanding with our Arab
>neighbors, or by some other way. . . I still believe . . . that after we
>become numerous and strong, the Arabs will understand that it is best for
>them to strike an alliance with us, and to benefit from our help, providing
>they allow us by their good will to settle in all parts of Palestine." -
>Shabtai Teveth, "Ben-Gurion And The Palestinian Arabs, >From Peace to War,
>p.
>188.[10]
>
>
> Ben-Gurion plainly avowed his support to the establishment of a Jewish
>state
>on part of Palestine only as an intermediary stage. In 1938 he recorded:
>
>
>"[I am] satisfied with part of the country, but on the basis of the
>assumption that after we build up a strong force following the
>establishment
>of the state--we will abolish the partition of the country and we will
>expand
>to the whole Land of Israel." - Nur Masalha, "Expulsion Of The
>Palestinians,"
>p. 107. Tom Segev, "One Palestine, Complete: Jews and Arabs Under the
>British
>Mandate," p. 403.
>
>
>"after the formation of a large army in the wake of the establishment of
>the
>[Jewish] state, we shall abolish partition and expand to the whole of the
>Palestine" (emphasis added). - Simha Falpan, [11] p. 22.
>
>
>In recent times, the Israeli government has been aware of growing
>international resistance to its brutal and murderous suppression of the
>Palestinians. Despite the absolute control of the American media by Jewish
>moguls and lobbies, the Israeli cabinet (Knesset) was still worried that
>Western nations could impose sanctions against Israel if ruthless Intifada
>activity continued against Palestinians. If public opinion in the West
>somehow became vociferous enough, Western nations in North America and
>Europe
>might step up sanctions against Israel. Eventually they reasoned, it could
>lead to a gradual and full-fledged oil embargo against Israel. Prior to the
>bombing of the World Trade Centers (9-11), the scenario for sanctions was
>entirely possible. There was a growing public awareness to the Israeli
>government persecuting the Palestinian people. A growing number of
>outspoken
>authorities accused the Israeli government of advocating genocide. Others
>charged openly that Israel was in violation of the 1993 and 1995 Oslo
>Accords
>and was illegally seizing Palestinian land. Indeed, the Internet played an
>important role in derailing the Israeli master plan for Eretz Israel.
>Israeli
>Knesset members warned that sanctions against Israel's armed forces would
>have a devastating effect against Israel's plans. They estimated Israel's
>armed forces would grind to a complete standstill in only a few weeks.
>
>
>Israel's intention for expansion is clear. A strong military is required to
>achieve this goal and Israel has attained one of the most advanced
>militaries
>in the world. Yet, the Zionist goal for a greater Israel has not been
>easy.
>Continuous conflict and Israel's repeated violations of human rights have
>brought Israel's policy under international scrutiny. World opinion against
>Israel is growing. Recently, 353 nations gathered for the 2001 UN Durban
>Conference in South Africa. 351 of those governments condemned Israel as a
>terrorist, apartheid, and racist state. Only two nations opposed the
>resolution - the United States and Israel. The growing pressure worldwide
>on
>the Zionist state has intensified the need to find an alternate source of
>oil, and to find it quickly. Israel's costly war machine cannot survive
>without ample supplies of petroleum. Time is running out and they are in a
>desperate state to obtain oil.
>
>
>Israel has implemented a strategic plan to make this happen. In fact, the
>blueprint for this plan has been around for decades. The blitzkrieg war
>tactic was implemented during the 1967 war and was successful in obtaining
>large tracts of land in a very short period. Before public opinion could
>react, Israel had already conquered the Sinai, the West Bank, and the Golan
>heights. Both the Sinai and the Golan Heights have strategic importance to
>Israel's war machine.
>
>
>"No Zionist can forgo the smallest portion of the Land of Israel. [A]
>Jewish
>state in part [of Palestine] is not an end, but a beginning . . . Our
>possession is important not only for itself ... through this we increase
>our
>power, and every increase in power facilitates getting hold of the country
>in
>its entirety. Establishing a [small] state . . . will serve as a very
>potent
>lever in our historical effort to redeem the whole country." - (From a
>written letter that Ben-Gurion wrote to his son in 1937 expressing his
>views
>about the Peel Commission proposal to partition Palestine). - Benny Morris,
>"Righteous Victims" p. 138.
>
>
>The plan for achieving Eretz Israel has repeatedly been pushed as the
>Israeli
>"solution" in past conflicts only to be tabled as a result of unforeseen
>events. The plan, along with conquering the transjordan, calls for seizing
>control of the Persian Gulf oil. Certainly for greater Israel to be
>finalized
>Iraq must be subjugated and a puppet regime installed.
>
>
>Not too many people are aware of the oil infrastructure that is already in
>place in the Middle East. Before Israel was in the news on a daily basis,
>there were already two oil pipelines built (by 1946) that fed the
>refineries
>and terminals of Israel's port city, Haifa from the Muslim oil fields in
>the
>east. One pipeline ran directly from Iraq. The other ran from Iraq to Haifa
>through Jordan. In the 1950s an 1100-mile pipeline was built by the
>Trans-Arabian Pipeline Company (Tapline) and was a major factor in economic
>development of Lebanon after independence. It was a joint venture by
>Standard
>Oil of New Jersey (Esso), Standard Oil of California (Chevron), the Texas
>Company (Texaco) and Socony-Vacuum Oil Company (Mobil). The pipeline was
>the
>largest of its time, transporting Saudi Arabian oil from the gulf fields to
>the terminal at Zahrani south of Saida, where it was shipped to the markets
>of Europe and the United States. At the peak of its operations "Tapline" is
>said to have transported up to 30 percent of Aramco's production of Saudi
>Arabian crude.[12]
>
>
>Tapline has an interesting history. It was originally planned to run from
>Saudi Arabia's Abqaiq oil fields to the port of Haifa in what was then
>known
>as Palestine. Haifa was already a modest terminal facility for the Iraqi
>Kirkuk oil field pipeline. However, oil magnates and politicians were
>concerned about the continuing conflict between the British Mandate and the
>Israeli independence movement. They consequently decided the Tapline
>Company
>develops an alternate route. A very similar situation concerning the
>instability of Afghanistan has occurred with the Bush Administration's
>negotiations with the Taliban for building a pipeline from Kazakhstan
>through
>Afghanistan to the Pakistani port city of Karachi. It is well known that
>the
>American petroleum giant Unocal was very interested in this project and
>pursued it for years. However, in 1998 its efforts were thwarted because of
>the Afghanistan civil war and then after bin Laden was accused of blowing
>up
>two American embassies in Africa. This caused the Taliban to become
>diplomatically isolated. The regional instability halted any further
>discussions of the Afghanistan pipeline. Although, Bridas, a former
>Argentinean oil firm was favored by the Taliban and was willing to start
>building the pipeline despite the civil war.[13]
>
>
>It is interesting to note, the Taliban was first funded and installed by
>the
>American government, but were then ultimately overthrown by the U.S.
>Taliban
>delegates met with State Department officials ante bellum and Unocal in
>Washington D.C. and may have infuriated their hosts with their continued
>interest in Unocal's competitor Bridas, (Bridas has since merged with BP
>Amoco Argentina). There are several reports that describe the Bush
>administration's negotiations concerning the pipeline with the Taliban
>including threats of war if the project was not allowed to pass through
>Afghanistan. The Taliban is now gone and a new Afghani President, Harmid
>Karzai has been installed in the Afghanistan government. It is more than
>coincidence that President Karzai was a former Unocal consultant.
>
>
>Indeed there are huge economic benefits at stake concerning the Caspian Sea
>basin oil reserves. According to testimony before the US House of
>Representatives in March 1999 by the conservative think tank, Heritage
>Foundation, the Caspian Sea basin contains 15 billion barrels of proven oil
>reserves. These countries (Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and
>Uzbekistan) also have confirmed gas deposits totaling not less than nine
>trillion cubic meters. Another study by the Institute for Afghan Studies
>estimated the total worth of oil and gas reserves in the Caspian Sea basin
>at
>around 3 trillion dollars at year 2000 prices.
>
>
>On December 27, 2002, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Turkmenistan signed a
>framework agreement for a 3.2 billion dollar gas pipeline project. It
>becomes
>apparent that the war against terrorism in Afghanistan has been a smoke
>screen to allow special interests to build the pipeline through
>Afghanistan.
>The 9/11 disaster allowed for Halliburton; an oil drilling company that
>former CEO Dick Cheney directed, Unocal; an oil and gas pipeline
>construction
>company, Enron; an energy trading company, which has stakes in India (the
>Dabhol power plant) for selling energy, and other oil and gas entities to
>make the Afghanistan pipeline possible. The Bush family has close ties to
>all
>these entities, including the Saudi Bin Laden Group.
>
>
>Several nations are vying for control of the Caspian Sea basin oil
>reserves.
>Israel is one of them. As a powerful lobbying force, they have been pushing
>for a proposed Baku-Ceyhan pipeline. Originally, the proposal was to extend
>from Baku, Azerbaijan, a port city on Caspian Sea to Ceyhan, Turkey. This
>would allow Israel to draw oil from it since Turkey is Israel's only Middle
>East ally. Even though oil companies were overwhelmingly opposed to it,
>Israel insisted on building this most expensive pipeline. It is estimated
>one
>million barrels of oil is required for an economically viable Baku-Ceyhan
>pipeline to proceed. Unfortunately, Azerbaijan has found very disappointing
>amounts of oil in its territory. The Israeli and American interests are now
>proposing to obtain oil from Kazakhstan. On March 26, 2001 London's
>"Financial Times" reported the U.S. "succeeded" in getting Kazakhstan to
>sign
>a memorandum that it "might" send oil across the Caspian to a future
>Baku-Ceyhan oil pipeline.
>
>
>It is doubtful that the Baku-Ceyhan pipeline will be built though. However,
>the Jewish state insisted on it to demonstrate to the Turkish government
>that
>its alliance with Israel is "profitable." The fact remains though that if
>the
>pipeline was built, it would represent yet another Israeli raid on the U.S.
>treasury. Indeed, the American financial support for this welfare nation is
>endless. It has already cost the American people 134.8 billion dollars[14]
>from its inception sixty-five years ago; a burden that cannot continue. The
>estimated cost of the Baku-Ceyhan line if it was built is 1 to 2 billion
>dollars more than a pipeline through Iran. Not surprising, Israel is
>opposed
>to building a pipeline through Iran and has lobbied against it.
>
>
>Tapline is increasingly a tempting source for Tel Aviv's energy and
>economic
>problems. If the Americans had listened to the Jews, the pipeline would
>have
>terminated at Haifa and not Sidon. Ironically, it was by the Jew's
>voracious
>quest to obtain Eretz Israel and the ensuing instability in the region that
>determined Tapline's final destination, a consequence that the Zionists did
>not anticipate. The final route passes over the Golan Heights in Syria and
>ends at Sidon in Lebanon. This decision was not without political
>consequences though. The setback was a reason for the Jewish State to
>conquer
>the Golan Heights. Indeed, Israel recognizes controlling Tapline and
>altering
>its course (of about a hundred miles) to Haifa will bring very large
>profits
>to Israel's economy. Is it possible that the American public will
>unwittingly
>pay for diverting Tapline to Haifa?
>
>
>The history of building Tapline is eerily similar to the planned
>Afghanistan
>pipeline. On September 1, 1947, parliamentary ratification of the Tapline
>Accord was delayed for political and economic reasons. The Syrian
>parliament
>was critical of U.S. policy in Palestine (Israel), and it wanted more
>favorable commercial terms from the Tapline consortium. U.S. oil executives
>were unwilling to bend on matters of profit and when it appeared the Syrian
>negotiations might fail, a convenient military coup in Damascus solved the
>problem. Within two months concessions were approved, which lead to the
>construction of the pipeline at the Sidon end.[15]
>
>
>A recent investigation of the military coup in Syria (first in their
>postwar
>history) indicate that American CIA agents Stephen Meade and Miles Copeland
>acted as the U.S. military attaché in Damascus and were directly involved
>in
>the coup in which Syrian colonel Husni Za'im seized power. According to
>Wilbur Eveland, a former CIA agent, the coup occurred for the specific
>purpose of obtaining the Syrian ratification of Tapline.[16] Douglas Little
>reported:
>
>
>"Meade and Zaim completed planning for the coup in early 1949. On March 14,
>Za'im 'requested U.S. agents [to] provoke and abet internal disturbances
>which [are] essential for coup d'etat' or that U.S. funds be given him
>[for]
>this purpose as soon as possible."[17]
>
>
>According to the same author, the Assistant Secretary of State, George
>McGhee
>visited Damascus at a crucial moment during these events and "possibly"
>authorized " U.S. support for [Husni] Za'im" in addition to discussing
>settlement of Palestinian refugees in Syria. It's interesting that even
>then
>the United States was pressured on allowing "transfers" by this new Jewish
>nation. Already, the expulsion of Palestinians began so that the Jewish
>state
>might obtain a "demographic" advantage.
>
>
>"The only reason that we agreed to discuss the [Peel commission proposed]
>partition plan," Ben-Gurion wrote Moshe Sharett, "is mass immigration. Not
>in
>the future, and not according to abstract formula, but large immigration
>now." - Shabtai Teveth, "Ben-Gurion And The Palestinian Arabs, From Peace
>to
>War," p. 184.
>
>
>Countless massacres took place in Beit Daras, Tantura, Deir Yassin, and in
>several other places. Innocent Palestinians were slaughtered in their homes
>and in the streets. Entire villages were destroyed. Palestinians were
>driven
>off their land by Jewish tactics of terror. Some were driven away at
>gunpoint
>while others fled for their lives as Zionist gangs attacked every Arab
>population center. As early as 1947 Ben-Gurion, the first Israeli Prime
>Minister spoke openly of the "partition" and the "transfer" of
>Palestinians.
>Rabbi Meir Kahane, founder of the militant Jewish Defense league, and
>Rehavam
>Ze'evi, a former Knesset member, advocated the transfer of Palestinians as
>well. It is clear by their statements the Palestinians were to be expelled
>from Palestine. Today, American and Israeli Jews talk of the very same
>issue.
>In an opinion poll administered by the University of Tel Aviv on March
>2002,
>46 percent of Israeli Jews supported the "Transfer" of Palestinians, while
>60
>percent favored" encouraging" Palestinians to leave on their own. Another
>tactic to force the Palestinians to flee is a variety of new taxes imposed
>on
>them, and at times abusive measures of collecting them. This includes
>midnight "tax raids," confiscation, and onerous administrative
>requirements.
>These are tyrannical and punitive measures designed to make life as
>miserable
>as possible.
>
>
>The term "transfer," which is being advocated by the current Sharon Israeli
>government, is a euphemism for ethnic cleansing. History has clearly
>detailed
>the expulsion of Palestinians from their ancestral homeland and the
>massacres
>accompanying it.
>
>
>If the American war against Iraq escalates, the Palestinians know the
>Israeli
>army will again covertly initiate their plan to force them from their homes
>and businesses. Past history has dictated that the Jewish government will,
>under the cover of world attention focused on the American invasion of
>Iraq,
>reinitiate their plan for Eretz Israel. If the international community does
>not stand up to Israel and halt its Zionist plans, the Jews will continue
>invading Arab lands, "transferring" civilian populations, murdering
>innocent
>women and children, destroying refugee camps, and laying siege to Christian
>churches. These abuses have been repeated time and again throughout their
>history. Israel will become more powerful and warlike by its successes for
>achieving Eretz Israel. Zionists, including Ben-Gurion, believe once Eretz
>Israel has been achieved, Jerusalem will become the world's capital.
>
>
>"Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a shrine
>of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will
>be
>the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among
>the federated continents." - David Ben-Gurion
>
>
>"The League of Nations is a Jewish idea. We created it after a fight of 25
>years. Jerusalem will one day become the Capital of World Peace." - Nahum
>Sokolow, During the Zionist Congress at Carlsbad in 1922.
>
>
>The USS Liberty is a testament of the American government hiding the
>voracious mission the Jewish State has for achieving Eretz Israel.
>Thirty-seven Americans died and one hundred seventy-four were wounded as a
>result of a proven attack against an unarmed American intelligence vessel.
>The Zionist Israeli government did not want the Americans to know about the
>pre-emptive strikes it made against its Muslim neighbors. As a consequence,
>the USS Liberty was attacked unmercifully by Israel. Somehow, the USS
>Liberty
>survived the 75-minute attack by Israeli aircraft and torpedo boats despite
>their brightly displayed U.S. flag during the entire assault. The survivors
>of the USS Liberty have all denied the rhetoric of "mistaken identity"
>presented by the Jewish government. Indeed, the Jewish-American Lobby has
>worked relentlessly to silence the voice of all the USS Liberty survivors.
>With their money power, the Jews have twisted the arms of American
>politicians to be silent on the issue. It has been an absolute disgrace
>that
>thirty-seven American sailors were victimized and murdered on an unarmed
>vessel and virtually not reported to the public. Indeed, the American media
>was predictably silent on the matter. For the first time in American
>history,
>American politicians had succumbed to Jewish interests to hide the
>murderers
>of thirty-seven American sailors. From thence the Israeli government knew
>that any Israeli damage to American protection could be swept under the
>carpet in exactly the same manner. Since this time, the Israeli influence
>has
>grown considerably.
>
>
>The economy of the United States is racked with recession with no sight to
>its end. This puts the State Department under immense pressure. War has
>always been the remedy to past economic woes. With the Jew's influence and
>immense political machinations, they are providing the Bush Administration
>with their solution. The promise for revenues from oil is a tempting
>investment, especially to oilmen like George Bush Jr. and Dick Cheney. But,
>to whom will this war benefit? It is obvious Israel will benefit the most.
>Indeed, the time for fulfillment of Eretz Israel has drawn near for the
>Zionist State. With world criticism growing, the Canaanite tribe knows that
>the outcome of any war is anarchy. Out of confusion all deceit can be
>effectively propagated. They now believe American politicians have
>succumbed
>to their political lobbies and their influence will hide all their deceit.
>
>
>"Five things did Canaan charge his sons: 'Love each other (i.e. of this
>tribe
>only), love robbery, love lewdness, hate your masters and never tell the
>truth.' " -- Pesachis F. 113b. | |  | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |
