| Author | Message | | Anglo Thug | | Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2002 5:55 pm Post subject: Blair the Liar |
| How is Britain's 'Ethical Foreign Policy' best described? Remember all the promises that accompanied the false dawn when 'New' Labour swept to power? Their most ethical policy on arm sales, far from being vague, is very clear - if there is a profit to be had then damn the consequences. Is there any other way to interpret the actions of this cynical and hypocritical government?
To sell weapons to a state that remains in flagrant violation of international law - when the arms pedlars know full well that these armaments will be used directly against civilians (by mistake of course) - is the gravest of crimes. This is murder for financial gain, not some 'practical' revision of policy as the bought and paid for ministers in Westminster would have us believe. Murder, because government is fully aware of the consequences of allowing sales to Israel to go ahead.
We are reminded that ten thousand jobs in the defence industry could be at risk if we do not participate in pouring arms into the world's main trouble spots - recall the Hawks to India scandal. Well how about the British steel industry Mr Blair? Have you afforded such key consideration to the men and women at risk of losing their jobs following your intervention on behalf of foreign competition? Scaling the heights of hypocrisy has never been mastered to such fine degree.
The following article is copyright Guardian Unlimited and is used here for non profit and fair use purposes only.
Cabinet in arms to Israel row
Kamal Ahmed, political editor
Sunday July 7, 2002
The Observer
Britain is bypassing its own arms embargo on Israel by selling military equipment via America.
In a move that has split the Cabinet, the Foreign Office is set to reveal that components for F16 fighter planes will be allowed to leave the country despite being destined for aircraft already sold to Ariel Sharon's government.
The move will be viewed with dismay by Arab states and anti-arms campaigners who say the arming of Israel raises tension in the area. One senior Government figure said there was a 'clear understanding' the fighter planes could be used for aggressive acts against the Occupied Territories, in direct contradiction to Tony Blair's call for peace.
Israel regularly uses F16s for assaults on the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. They have been used in attacks on Rafah and the Palestinian securty compound in Nablus, killing civilians.
Government sources admitted the issue was 'delicate' and that rules on sales to embargoed countries via third countries were vague. One said the charge of hypocrisy would be 'difficult to head off'.
'We look at these things on a case-by-case basis,' said one senior Downing Street official. 'We have to make it clear we will only sell to countries where there are effective procedures for controlling which countries the equipment is sold on to.'
The deal will again focus attention on the Government's attitude to military sales abroad and raise the possibility that any arms embargo can be bypassed by selling to a third country.
The Government was condemned this year when it was revealed it was backing a £28 million military air traffic control system for Tanzania despite claims the country did not need and could not afford such a high-tech system.
The Ministry of Defence has been pushing for the Israel deal to go through, despite opposition from Patricia Hewitt, the Trade and Industry Secretary. She is worried about the negative message such a deal sends to Arab supporters and the rest of the European Union.
However, Hewitt will now back the deal as long as the rules on future contracts to third countries are clear. Britain is to provide sophisticated navigation and targeting equipment for the F16s, which are being built in America for Israel.
The 'head-up displays' allow pilots to see positional and weapons information displayed in front of each eye without having to look at separate dials. It is sold as allowing pilots to fly with fewer distractions and increasing the accuracy of bombing raids.
The MoD admitted the contract was part of a wooing exercise to get US military business. Britain and the US are already planning a £100 billion joint strike fighter project.
'We have to get as much of that business as possible and we cannot be prescriptive on what we will and won't sell them,' said one MoD source. 'The British defence industry employs tens of thousands of people. We have to show we are a reliable supplier of high-tech defence equipment.'
The Foreign Office has already officially warned Israel about using British equipment to target the Occupied Territories.
In May, Foreign Secretary Jack Straw demanded an explanation from Sharon's government about the use of British military equipment in tanks and attack helicopters. Straw was furious that their use had come to light despite a written pledge from Israel in November 2000 that said 'no UK-originated equipment . . . is used as part of the defence force's activities in the territories'.
Campaigners against the new Israeli arms deal will point to guidelines published by the Government in 1997. They said that departments 'will not issue an export licence if there is a clearly identifiable risk that the intended recipient would use the proposed export aggressively against another country'.
Although the Palestinian Authority areas are not officially a country, Blair has said that he supports a separate Palestinian state. | |  | | msteffan1 | | Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2002 3:53 pm Post subject: |
| Ahh....thats why we sold thousands of rounds of small arms callibre stuff to Zimbabwe earlier this year with the full knowledge of that country's internal strife....We were proving we have the right to sell arms to anyone we want to...
We impressed Big brother in the USA so much...Theyve invited us to do the same in all regional conflicts.
Has anyone been back to finish the feasability study in Chechenya since the last telecoms lads were there....? As Jim Royal would say..Mobile phones my.... | | | | Anglo Thug | | Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2002 11:14 pm Post subject: |
| | It is remarkable how Chechenya, once used as an issue to beat the Russians with, has vanished from our press. Is nothing newsworthy occurring in that region anymore? | | | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk | 
