| Author | Message | | hateliars | | Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 5:04 am Post subject: Nuclear war starting in 10 days? |
| Nuclear war starting in 10 days?
11.08.2006 Source: URL: http://english.pravda.ru/hotspots/conflicts/83898-Nuclear_War-0
Such was the conclusion reached in the U.S. Russian generals and political scientists disagree only about its exact starting date.
Our world is on the brink of another world war. It will originate August 22nd in the Middle East. The prediction was presented not by Vagna or Nostradamus but by an American political scientist Bernard Lewis in the acclaimed publication of Wall Street Journal. He is a man with close ties to the Bush administration as well as to the non-conservatives pushing for the radical solution of the “Iranian Threat.”
Lewis believes it will be precisely Teheran who will unleash the ultimate conflict by attacking Israel. Why August 22nd? Perhaps simply because Washington has set a deadline for the Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and has demanded a complete wrap up of the nuclear program by that day. It is obvious that Teheran has no intention to comply. Curiously, this year the night of August 22nd happens to be night Muslims will celebrate the journey of their prophet Mohammed to Jerusalem and his ascension into heaven. According to Lewis the followers of Mohammed have a perfect opportunity to enrich their celebration by throwing an attack on Israel. An immediate retaliation will follow.
“Such a scenario does not seem too unrealistic to me,” comments Sergey Markov, a Russian political scientist, “These days anything is possible in the Middle East. People living there are crazy and they constantly keep playing with fire. Their situation has gone out of control and is ready to explode any minute. In fact, the new world war is already going in that place.”
The First Act
As the Israeli invasion of Lebanon continues it is becoming clearer that Tel-Aviv actually aims at much more than the elimination of Hezbollah. Israel could have long since used its omnipresent scouts to put an end to the resistance’s activity. Neither does the complete destruction of all Hezbollah’s rocket-launching sites present a problem for the Israeli army with its tremendous equipment and might.
So why the endless bombing of Lebanese cities and villages? And why the overwhelming U.S. support? All this is happening precisely during the time when Americans seem unable to force Iran to comply with their demands. Lebanese occupation under the excuse of defending against Hezbollah is itself an excuse for solving the Iranian problem.
The Second Act
Israel has already achieved the minimum solution by getting rid of “Hezbollah” across the border. What more do they need? UN has already offered to fill the occupied area with troops and peace-keepers but Tel-Aviv has still not given its consent. The U.S. is not in hurry to give the green light either. In all actuality it looks like the two countries are intentionally waiting until Iran gets involved in the conflict. The expecting parties might anticipate the attack in the face of fired Iranian rockets, which Tel-Aviv will intercept as they had often done previously with the rockets from Iraq. This time, however, Washington and Tel-Aviv will have acquired an official right to retaliate against Iran.
The Third Act
Israel will attack Iranian nuclear sites. The U.S. will provide its support through the Navy in the Persian Gulf and perhaps through the Air Force. Iran will not delay with its own full-scale attack against the Israeli sites and the U.S. ships.
At this point no one can guarantee that the rest of the Arab World is going to remain watching as an innocent and uninvolved bystander.
The Fourth Act
Very soon such participants as Turkey will inevitably get dragged into the funnel of war. In Iraq and Afghanistan anti-government militant groups will become very active. Finally the conflict will focus on the fighting for the control over the territories with major oil resources. That is exactly with the U.S. is after.
The eventual possession of the oil treasury by one of the conflicting sides will provoke harsh resistance from both Asia and Europe. Russia is also very likely to get provoked into becoming an active participant. In the end this might become the Ultimate Fifth Act, in which no one wishes to believe…
Political Scientist’s Opinion
Alexander Prohanov, the main editor of “Zavtra” Newspaper:“Apocalypse Tomorrow”
- The pulling of the trigger leading to the tragic chain of events has been done. Syria and Iran will be pulled into the war right after Lebanon. Israeli and American attacks on Iran will lead to the interruption of oil exports into Europe and China. Their economies will suffer. In the conclusion there will be chaos all across Asia.
The detonation device for the new apocalypse has been set off by Americans, obviously. They believe that they have the power and the authority to regulate the world’s chaos. But the U.S. cannot even gain control over its own minor chaos in Latin America. Let us only hope that Russia will remain neutral throughout this universal nightmare.
Military’s Opinion
Alexander Vladimirov, major general and vice-president of the Board of Military Experts of Russia:“Collision of Civilizations”
- This war is utterly futile for either one of the sides. And as the one lacking in logic it is all the more dangerous. The most dangerous aspect lies in the fact that Israel (and perhaps even Iran by now) possess nuclear weapons and are able to put them to use. This means the beginning of the global war because other countries will not be able to remain uninvolved in the collision of civilizations of this magnitude.
Source: Moskovskii Komsomolets
Translated by Natalia Vysotskaya
Discuss this article on Pravda.ru English Forum
© 1999-2006. «PRAVDA.Ru». When reproducing our materials in whole or in part, hyperlink to PRAVDA.Ru should be made. The opinions and views of the authors do not always coincide with the point of view of PRAVDA.Ru's editors. | |  | | Cowboy | | Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 5:09 am Post subject: |
| | I suppose oil wells can be operated by people in radiation suits. | | | | hateliars | | Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 5:16 am Post subject: |
| | No people after a nuclear war so who needs oil? | | | | Cowboy | | Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 6:46 am Post subject: |
| | Quote: | | No people after a nuclear war |
A ridiculous assumption. | | | | Alpha | | | | Alpha | | | | hateliars | | Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:49 pm Post subject: |
| | Quote: | Quote:
No people after a nuclear war
A ridiculous assumption. |
Oh I forgot. The elect have access to underground bomb shelters. It's just the rest of us who don't. | | | | Cowboy | | Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 6:58 pm Post subject: |
| 
I know you want us to all believe that nobody in the US will be alive if Iran gets pissed off at us, but it simply isn't anywhere near reality. | | | | hateliars | | Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 8:15 pm Post subject: |
| Moron. Iran is no more a threat to us than was Iraq. It's the alliance between Russia and Iran that is the issue.
Go suck on Bush's dick you filthy whore. | | | | Alpha | | Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 8:29 pm Post subject: |
| Forwarded:
rainesco responded:
The Lewis article is too smart by half, and the Pravda article erroneously states that Hezbollah has been cleared out.
The recent war has not been a cakewalk, and Israel is suffering.. The only way Israel's vaunted "superiority" can be put into action is for them to go to the highest level of attack possible -- really destroying the zone, becoming totally anathema to 90% of the world, and provoking a truly serious united counter-attack in the region. (And that could indeed lead to the ultimate conflagration.)
The smartest Iranian strategy is to continue playing cat-and-mouse, and it's problematic to assume that there is broad support in Iran for a direct war of any kind -- particularly pre-emptive.
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter
Sent: Aug 12, 2006 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: Nuclear war starting in 10 days?
Thankyou for that little bit of future news..
Bernard Lewis is one of those Jews about whom one has never heard before but about whom other Jews (and, it would seem, *only* Jews) write endless reviews, notices and puffs (see http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Bernard+Lewis%22&btnG=Google+Search). He is a zionist historian and thus can hardly be said to possess a detached point of view. Perhaps there will be a thermonuclear war. If there is then perhaps it will start (and end) on August 22nd 2006. Perhaps, perhaps...
However, in case it happens, Lewis' job is to ensure that the blame for it has already been laid on those pesky Ayrabs. We, of course, and the Russians know differently. (I'm not sure the Chinese fully understand certain non-Chinese cultures.) If it is not our good fortune to be vaporised on that day then we will all know that it was started by mad Jews.
Perhaps what the Jews are really doing in Lebanon is setting up a buffer zone. Militarily, Lebanon is the Jews' weakness since it both can supply an attacking ground army with food and water and forms a land bridge into the ground held by Jews. The River Litani is a natural barrier against ground vehicles. (Perhaps the French could have prevented the German invasion of 1914 by themselves invading Belgium instead of waiting for the Germans at their half-finished [i]Maginot Line.)
Nuclear war starting in 10 days?
11.08.2006 Source: URL: http://english.pravda.ru/hotspots/conflicts/83898-Nuclear_War-0 | | | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |
