| Author | Message | | DanielDives | | Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:25 pm Post subject: |
| So that list explains why WTC7 collapsed?
And as many of the perps were Saudi nationals, why don't you want to bomb the hell out of that country? | |  | | Cowboy | | Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:53 am Post subject: |
| | Quote: | | So that list explains why WTC7 collapsed? |
Along with the rest of the actual evidence, yes it does.
But the way WTC7 failed does not change the fact that jihadis hijacked airliners and flew them into the towers.
| Quote: | | And as many of the perps were Saudi nationals, why don't you want to bomb the hell out of that country? |
Because al Qaeda is not being harbored there by the Saudi government. | | | | DanielDives | | Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 5:33 am Post subject: |
| That's odd.
The NIST and FEMA haven't provided any conclusive evidence, yet you know for sure what happened.
WTC7 was not attacked by any plane, yet it came down like a house of cards. And all that because of diesel fuel...
You must adore David Copperfield. | | | | Cowboy | | Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 4:27 am Post subject: |
| | Quote: | | The NIST and FEMA haven't provided any conclusive evidence, yet you know for sure what happened. |
Jihadi terrorists hijacked airliners and flew them into the towers. It resulted in the collapse of WTC7.
The fact is, you have absolutely nothing that supports the conspiracy theories.
| Quote: | | WTC7 was not attacked by any plane, yet it came down like a house of cards. |
No, houses of cards to not come down due to damage to transfer beams. And rarelydue to jihadi attack with hijacked airliners.
| Quote: | | And all that because of diesel fuel... |
So now the evidence is there I guess.
| Quote: | | You must adore David Copperfield. |
Free clue: Fire can damage steel framed buildings. If it could not, engineers/designers/developers would not spend huge amounts of money to put fire insulation on beams. | | | | DanielDives | | Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 5:40 am Post subject: |
| Q:
Jihadi terrorists hijacked airliners and flew them into the towers. It resulted in the collapse of WTC7.
R: ????
Wow. Now that's what I call a solid piece of evidence.
You keep missing th bit that both FEMA and NIST do not explain what exactly caused the buildings [WTC 1&2] to collapse. You also refuse to acknowledge that those reports don't even touch WTC 7.
As you have not proved anything beyond reasonable doubt, you're still clinging on to a conspiracy theory.
You can bring up those Jihadis as many times as you want, it doesn't explain the causes and initiations of three collapses. | | | | Cowboy | | Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:05 am Post subject: |
| | Quote: | | You keep missing th bit that both FEMA and NIST do not explain what exactly caused the buildings [WTC 1&2] to collapse. |
Irrelevant. There is absolutely no evidence whqatsoever to believe any conspiracy theory.
| Quote: | | You also refuse to acknowledge that those reports don't even touch WTC 7. |
False.
| Quote: | | As you have not proved anything beyond reasonable doubt, you're still clinging on to a conspiracy theory. |
But actully, it is proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Given that there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever to prove any conspiracy theory, your doubt is highly unreasonable.
| Quote: | | You can bring up those Jihadis as many times as you want, it doesn't explain the causes and initiations of three collapses. |
So we are to believe that there was a conspiracy theory behind the collapse even though the jihadis hijacked the airliners and flew them into the towers?  And that sounds reasonable to you, eh? | | | | DanielDives | | Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 8:19 am Post subject: |
| Q: Irrelevant. There is absolutely no evidence whqatsoever to believe any conspiracy theory.
R: You throw the 'irrelevant' bit around as if you know what actually happened inside those 3 WTC tuwers.
We both know you don't.
And how fortunate those hijackers picked the exact date the country was running multiple, in some cases, similar scenarios defending Alaskan airspace.
Yeah, you're conspiracy theory is much sounder than mine | | | | Cowboy | | Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 7:18 pm Post subject: |
| There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever to believe any conspiracy theory.
Period.
And your inability to provide any is clearly shown. | | | | DanielDives | | Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 1:26 pm Post subject: |
| Well, dude, you believe in one. You have never explained what happened inside those three buildings because you can't. So stop pretending you're upholding something like the 'truth' here.
WTC7, dude. No planes. | | | | Cowboy | | Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 4:57 am Post subject: |
| There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever to believe any conspiracy theory.
Period.
And your inability to provide any is clearly shown.
Once again.
| Quote: | | WTC7, dude. No planes. |
WTC7, dude. Irrelevant.
But you are pretending that the tower collapses did not damage it???
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Afb7eU
But I digress...
There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever to believe any conspiracy theory.
Applies to WTC7 as well. | | | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |
