| Author | Message | | gadfly | | Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 11:31 am Post subject: INSTEAD OF LISTENING TO NETANYAHU SPEECH ,OBAMA PLAYED GOLF. |
| Instead of listening to Binyamin Netanyahu’s long-awaited speech on 14 June, Barack Obama chose to spend the day playing golf. Nothing could better illustrate the nature of the relationship between Israel’s prime minister and the American president.
The two are now bitter adversaries. That is clear for all to see. Their respective visions of a Middle East peace settlement are plainly contradictory. But whereas Netanyahu is anxious and defensive, Obama is relaxed. He knows that time is on his side. These are early days in the battle of wills.
It is a most unequal battle. Netanyahu will dig in his heels. He will move heaven and earth to mobilise his American allies against Obama. In Israel, fanatical settlers and other champions of a ‘Greater Israel’ will defame the American president, depicting him in their posters as an ‘Anti-Semitic Jew-hater’. But, in the end, the balance of power is such that Netanyahu will be compelled to bend to the will of the American president -- or leave office.
Indeed, some in Washington believe that Obama plans -- by gradually increasing the pressure -- if not to oust Netanyahu altogether, then to force him to drop the extreme right and bring Tzipi Livni’s centre-right Kadima into his coalition. The new coalition might then be ready to accept a two-state solution -- indeed, the comprehensive Arab-Israeli peace -- which Obama has pledged to bring about.
In his speech, Netanyahu managed, just once, to force himself to utter the hated words “Palestinian state,” but they were so hedged about with restrictions as to make them virtually meaningless. Nevertheless, Obama generously welcomed this “step forward,” with the plain implication that bolder steps in the same direction could not long be avoided.
Netanyahu now has his back to the wall. Rarely in recent decades have Israel’s relations with Washington been so tense. Never since the early 1960s, when JFK was in the White House, has Israel felt such anxiety about the relationship with its superpower patron, so vital to its well-being and existence.
Like any negotiator with a weak hand, Netanyahu has begun by stating his maximalist terms. He has put forward no fewer than seven conditions for the Palestinians -- and for Obama -- to accept, before he will even consider moving towards the goal of Palestinian statehood. The following are his conditions:
The future Palestinian state must be demilitarised -- without an army, without control of its airspace, without the ability to conclude military pacts with anyone, and with real monitoring to prevent weapons smuggling. In other words, Israel alone has the right to defend itself: The Palestinians must remain at its mercy.
The Palestinians must “clearly and unambiguously recognise Israel as the state of the Jewish people.” This provision discriminates openly against the Arab citizens of Israel, and robs the Palestinian refugees -- those driven out of Palestine in 1947-8 and their descendants -- of any legitimate claim against Israel.
Israel must have defensible borders. Netanyahu did not state where inside surrounding Arab territory he believed they should be traced!
Jerusalem must remain the united capital of Israel. This is a claim no Palestinian, and indeed no Muslim can willingly accept.
“The Palestinian refugee problem will be resolved outside Israel’s borders.” Netanyahu thus totally rejects the Palestinians’ right of return, even of token numbers; he does not recognise any Palestinian claim to what he calls “the homeland of the Jewish people”; and he does not even mention the word compensation.
On the crucial matter of illegal Jewish settlements on the West Bank, Netanyahu failed to mention a freeze, still less did he promise to dismantle the proliferating outposts. He did say that “we have no intention of building new settlements or of expropriating additional land for existing settlements,” adding, however, that “there is a need to enable the residents to live normal lives.” This phrase has been widely interpreted to mean that he intends building within settlement boundaries to continue -- what has been called ‘natural growth’, a notion Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hilary Clinton have both explicitly rejected.
Netanyahu’s final condition was that the Palestinian Authority must “overcome Hamas.” In other words, he is calling for renewed inter-Palestinian warfare.
Not surprisingly, the Palestinians -- and the Arab world generally -- have angrily dismissed Netanyahu’s speech as a further nail in the coffin of peace. But they should not despair. They should remember that this is only the start of what promises to be a long drawn-out battle between the Israeli prime minister and the American president.
It will not be easy for Israelis to grasp that their past leaders made two serious mistakes. The first was the land-grab in the occupied territories which started in 1967 and continues to this day. The second was the doctrine that Israel’s security lay, not in making peace with its neighbours, but in dominating the entire region militarily. Neither of these positions is now acceptable. The present generation of Israelis is being called upon to correct them.
That is the essence of Obama’s message, and that is the problem Netanyahu has to wrestle with.
Patrick Seale is a leading British writer on the Middle East, and the author of The Struggle for Syria; also, Asad of Syria: The Struggle for the Middle East; and Abu Nidal: A Gun for Hire.
Source: Agence Global
This article was made possible by the support of readers like you. | |  | | Ilana_Halevy | | Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:12 pm Post subject: |
| Obama bows low to Saudi king and shows public disrpispect to Bibi. Nevertheless our Mohammedans say that America is ZOG  | | | | Philadelphian | | Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:19 pm Post subject: |
| | America is, but it's starting to look like Obama's not. | | | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |
