| Author | Message | | Alpha | | Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 11:42 pm Post subject: KERRY’S ‘UNWAVERING’ COMMITMENT TO ISRAEL |
| James Bamford conveys in his new book ('A Pretext for War') that US support for Israel's brutal oppression of the Palestinians is what contributed to the motivation for the tragic World Trade Center attacks in 1993 and on September 11th, 2001 (9/11). See the timeline at the following URL: http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2004/08/26/zionist-neocon-timeline-for-war.php The 9/11 Commission Report (on page 147) also mentions that US support for Israel was why the World Trade Center was attacked in 1993. So the following is how this Israel firster hack Kerry (who is of Jewish descent) is going to protect America?: KERRY’S ‘UNWAVERING’ COMMITMENT TO ISRAEL “As president, I will never pressure Israel to make concessions that will compromise its security. My commitment to a safe and secure Jewish state is unwavering... We must stand with Israel, supporting our ally's right to build a security fence... As president, I will use bold diplomacy to get governments to recognize the growing crisis of resurgent anti-Semitism, and take action to deal with it...” -------------------------------------------------------- AN UNWAVERING COMMITMENT TO REFORMING THE MIDDLE EAST By John Kerry - Forward (New York) - August 27, 2004 http://www.forward.com/main/article.php?ref=kerry200408251051 Across the Middle East, the United States and Israel are facing a range of crucial security challenges. We are not secure while Saudi donors fund terror, while Iran pursues a nuclear weapons programs and while Syria sponsors terrorist operations. We are not secure while Iraq is at risk of becoming a haven for terrorists. And we are not secure while Israel, the one true democracy in the region, remains the victim of an unrelenting campaign of terror. If we continue without a more effective strategy, we are not supporting our ally as best we can. For too long, America has not led, and Iran's program has advanced. Let me say it plainly: a nuclear-armed Iran is unacceptable. I believe we must work with our allies to end Iran's nuclear weapons program and be ready to work with them to implement a range of tougher measures, if needed. Developing an international coalition enhances our influence by ensuring that all nations are united in the effort, leaving no room for Iran to play allies against one another. The Syria Accountability Act, which I co-sponsored in the Senate, gave the president authority to sanction Syria, a concrete step against Syria's support for terror and its occupation of Lebanon. As president, I will never delay implementing sanctions as the Bush administration did for many months. The greatest long-term strategic threat to U.S.-Israeli relations is U.S. dependence on Mideast oil. A new national security policy demands an end to that dependence. For too long, America has lost its voice when talking about the policies and practices of some governments in the Persian Gulf. If we are serious about energy independence, then we can finally be serious about confronting the role of Saudi Arabia in financing and providing ideological backing for Islamic fundamentalist jihadists. This is a problem that this administration has ignored -- and one that must be addressed. I have a plan for energy independence from Mideast oil in the next 10 years. I will invest in the research and exploration needed to develop renewable energy sources. I will take the lead in developing the new technology and production methods needed to ensure that resources such as coal and natural gas are used more efficiently and cleanly, and fully integrated into the new energy economy. I want an America that relies on its own ingenuity and innovation and not the Saudi royal family. As president, I will use bold diplomacy to get governments to recognize the growing crisis of resurgent anti-Semitism, and take action to deal with it -- not hide it. Silence will never prevail -- either abroad or at home. As president, I will support the creation of an office within the State Department dedicated to combating anti-Semitism, as well as adding reporting on acts of anti-Semitism around the world to the State Department's annual human rights reporting. I will work with the United Nations and our allies to bolster security in Iraq so that we can meet our goals for elections and speed up reconstruction. I will launch a massive effort to train and equip Iraqi security forces, so that they can take over the security of their nation, allowing us to draw down our troops in an orderly manner. These steps will be vastly more effective when backed by a long-term strategy to change the political equation in the Middle East, to empower reformers and foster democracy. I will launch an aggressive public diplomacy campaign in Arab and Muslim countries to tackle head-on the anti-Semitic and anti-Israel propaganda that fuels ignorance and hatred. This will be a part of an expansive American-led, international effort to promote democratic reforms throughout the Middle East by supporting secular education, business development and educational initiatives. By carefully targeting aid and development programs we can most effectively bolster civil society groups to take action to advance reform. American leadership is needed to bolster Israel's security at home as well as in the region. I believe that we must stand with Israel, supporting our ally's right to build a security fence and to allow its own Supreme Court -- not the International Court of Justice -- to address the issue of the route of the fence. The fence has proven its value as an anti-terror measure. I believe, in addition, that the withdrawal from Gaza, which Prime Minister Sharon announced in April, holds great promise. Indeed, this step enjoys overwhelming support among Israelis. It must receive our support and backing as well. The success of the withdrawal also requires a real Palestinian effort to establish security -- to ensure Gaza does not remain a haven for terrorists to launch attacks on Israel. Experience has made very clear that for the Palestinians to meet this key test, new Palestinian leadership is required, as Yasser Arafat has proven himself not to be a partner for peace. As president, I will work with the Palestinian community to empower new, responsible Palestinian leadership committed to a permanent end to terror and the promotion of democracy. I will ensure that allies are united in this effort, not working at cross-purposes by propping up a failed Palestinian power structure. This kind of tough and frank diplomacy will be a hallmark of my administration. We will magnify our power and restore American influence to enhance our own security and that of our allies. We will restore our alliances and we will lead. But we will never compromise America's special relationship with our ally Israel. As president, I will never pressure Israel to make concessions that will compromise its security. My commitment to a safe and secure Jewish state is unwavering. For 19 years, this is a pledge I have kept in the United States Senate -- whether through my votes on economic aid, military security or the location of the U.S. Embassy. And it is one I will continue to keep as I lead a bold new effort to enhance regional security throughout the Middle East. =========================================================== | |  | | 1amc | | Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 10:13 am Post subject: |
| | Quote: | KERRY’S ‘UNWAVERING’ COMMITMENT TO ISRAEL “As president, I will never pressure Israel to make concessions that will compromise its security. My commitment to a safe and secure Jewish state is unwavering... We must stand with Israel, supporting our ally's right to build a security fence... As president, I will use bold diplomacy to get governments to recognize the growing crisis of resurgent anti-Semitism, and take action to deal with it...” | I believe that the time has come for the American people to demand that the relationships, between the United States, Israel and certain Israeli groups be reviewed immediately. Israel and certain Israeli groups will always put the interest of Israel and their own ideologies ahead of any thought of America or the rest of the world. My perspective at this time goes like this, 9-11 was “Tonkin Bay 2001” and it was extremely successful. Now we have to “DEAL WITH IT”. 9-11 was a conspiracy that continues within America. The actors that conspired to stage the event are criminals, pure and simple. The list of crimes they committed will be large, as will the number of individuals that will be caught and prosecuted for these crimes. I tend to disagree with the assumption that this has to be a massive conspiracy; I think we may find that a relative small number of persons actually working for the government, and others working within the government were actually involved in the prosecution of the traitorous deed itself. The conspirators that planned the 9-11 events are more than likely outside the criminals that originated the ideal of using an event of such magnitude to change history and lead our country on the courses we now travel. The number of individuals needed to accomplish the act is directly related to the power of the persons involved. I also tend to lean heavily toward involvement by Israelis. “WE, THE JEWISH PEOPLE, CONTROL AMERICA, AND THE AMERICANS KNOW IT.” Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon October 3, 2001 (IAP NEWS) We do not need to wait 5-10-25-50 years to know the traitorous criminals that were involved in 9-11. (Northwoods 40 years) The ideologies that contemplated and carried out the criminal acts on 9-11 are a very real (Level Bright Red) threat to our country. Think about it; they committed what they thought were perfect crimes, escaping unknown and untouched. Now the depth and breath of their crimes are being exposed and they have nowhere to hide. The repercussions from the truth about 9-11 may be far reaching and with amazing changes in the relationships we now have with Israel. I do not think for a moment that certain groups of Israelis would hesitate in killing 3000 Americans, or 300,000 Americans, or 3,000,000 Americans if they thought the results would benefit their vision of Israel and the rest of the world. I do not for a moment think that certain Americans (powerful people, families, and corporations,) would hesitate in killing 3000 Americans, or 300,000 Americans, or 3,000,000 Americans if the results would benefit their visions of themselves and the rest of the world. Israel is somewhat like a child which has benefited from 50 plus years of leniency, and protection from an over zealous mother (USA) who would not listen to any sort of criticism whatsoever of her lovely child. Now the child has become a sociopathic serial mass murderer. Whatever relations we have from this point on with the State of Israel and certain related Israeli groups cannot continue to proceed as is, by outdated agreements and arrangements that blind us to the evil in the child. This is not Isramerica, or Jewmerica. This is the “United States of America” and even with all its warts and blemishes it is ours, not theirs. Our treasury and military are not supported by the citizens to be used or abused by any other county regardless of who they are. We cannot lose our democracy and solvency because of our subservience to any country or ideologies. We have to assume the role of leadership. You know the saying,”Lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way”. We have to lead, we cannot follow, and we are too big and bad to get the hell out of the way. When I say bad, I do mean bad, we have the ability and the means to defeat any foe or foes on this planet. It is a given that we are by far the most potentially dangerous nation that has ever existed. How, we manage this massive power will probably decide the fate of this world. The enormity of American power is almost inconceivable, capable of turning the planet into a lifeless hunk of space debris. It makes no “difference” to history if the United States of America becomes a failed experiment in “Democracy”, but it damn well “matters” to history. This “Country’ was not built on the backs of our many millions of ancestors, mostly decent, hard working, and honest people, to be given away to any peoples, cults, political parties, or other country, so they could fund themselves, their friends (conspirators), and their ideologies as some kind elixir for World Government. Respects, | |  | | Ilana_Halevy | | Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 10:20 am Post subject: |
| | Quote: | “WE, THE JEWISH PEOPLE, CONTROL AMERICA, AND THE AMERICANS KNOW IT.” Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon October 3, 2001 (IAP NEWS) | Stuid lie. Sharon never said anything like this. | Quote: | | I do not think for a moment that certain groups of Israelis would hesitate in killing 3000 Americans, or 300,000 Americans, or 3,000,000 Americans if they thought the results would benefit their vision of Israel and the rest of the world. I do not for a moment think that certain Americans (powerful people, families, and corporations,) would hesitate in killing 3000 Americans, or 300,000 Americans, or 3,000,000 Americans if the results would benefit their visions of themselves and the rest of the world. | I do not think for a moment that you are not idiot. | Quote: | | Israel is somewhat like a child which has benefited from 50 plus years of leniency, and protection from an over zealous mother (USA) | USA start to help Israel only AFTER Six Day war in 1967. Learn some history. | |  | | Alpha | | Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 10:36 am Post subject: |
| More truth distorted spin and lies from the Israeli Likudite (Ilana) as no wonder Israelis can't be trusted. Of course Sharon said that, but Ilana and other Zionist Jews (who smile as they say that the USA is the 'second state of Israel') don't want the majority of Americans to find this out... Ilana likes to conveniently forget that there wouldn't be any Israel if it weren't for Truman getting bought off by a Zionist in order for him to push Israel through the UN (and Foppe has made an excellent point in that the UN still didn't accept Israel, so perhaps Israel is a fraud at the UN as well). In addition, the USA started pouring US taxpayer dollars into the rogue state of Israel (see the link at www.wrmea.com ) after it deliberately (treacherously) attacked the USS Liberty ( http://www.ussliberty.com ) murdering 34 America sailors and wounding 172 (worse attack on the US Navy in peacetime) and has been able to get away with lying about it ever since. No wonder Israelis know they can get away with that 'mistake' excuse time after time from the USS Liberty attack to the Qana massacre at the UN enclave (which pushed Bin Laden to attack the World Trade Center for US support of Israel's brutal oppression of the Palestinians as James Bamford conveys on pages 138-145 of his 'A Pretext for War' book) to the murder of Rachel Corrie: http://www.nowarforisrael.com/Rachel%20Corrie.htm http://www.nowarforisrael.com CUT ISRAEL LOSE TO SAVE AMERICA | Ilana_Halevy wrote: | | Quote: | “WE, THE JEWISH PEOPLE, CONTROL AMERICA, AND THE AMERICANS KNOW IT.” Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon October 3, 2001 (IAP NEWS) | Stuid lie. Sharon never said anything like this. | Quote: | | I do not think for a moment that certain groups of Israelis would hesitate in killing 3000 Americans, or 300,000 Americans, or 3,000,000 Americans if they thought the results would benefit their vision of Israel and the rest of the world. I do not for a moment think that certain Americans (powerful people, families, and corporations,) would hesitate in killing 3000 Americans, or 300,000 Americans, or 3,000,000 Americans if the results would benefit their visions of themselves and the rest of the world. | I do not think for a moment that you are not idiot. | Quote: | | Israel is somewhat like a child which has benefited from 50 plus years of leniency, and protection from an over zealous mother (USA) | USA start to help Israel only AFTER Six Day war in 1967. Learn some history. | | |  | | Alpha | |  | | Alpha | | Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 10:51 am Post subject: Excellent Panel Discussion on US/Israel Policy |
| Excellent panel discussion (referred to below) on US policy for Israel can be watched via link at http://wwwcnionline.org A very valued Jewish contact/friend is Jeffrey Blankfort. Congressman McCloskey represented him in his case against the ADL (see the URL below about such): http://www.rense.com/general24/adl.htm Jeff also wrote the following articles: http://www.leftcurve.org/LC27WebPages/IsraelLobby.html http://www.leftcurve.org/LC28WebPages/WarForIsrael.html However, I had never seen Congressman McCloskey speak before. Ambassador Peck was also excellent. So were Ambassador Bird and Mr. Howell. James Bamford's new book ('A Pretext for War') is a must read with regard to how US support for Israel's brutal oppression of the Palestinians contributed to the motivation for the tragic World Trade Center attacks in 1993 and on September 11th, 2001 as well. Isn't it interesting that the 9/11 Commission mentions similar on page 147 of its recently released report but does not have changing US policy for Israel as one of its recommendations. 'A Pretext War' also conveys detail on the JINSA/CSP/PNAC Neocon agenda for the invasion of Iraq... Pat Buchanan also has an superb book ('Where the Right Went Wrong: How Neoconservatives Subverted the Reagan Revolution and Hijacked the Bush Presidency') that was just released in time for the Republican Convention as Chapter 2 is all about the neocon hijacking of the Bush presidency. I don't agree with all the positions that Buchanan has taken with his prior and present writings (against the UN and similar), but he is absolutely spot on with his position on the neocons. Chapter 2 of his new book expands on his 'Whose War?' article: http://www.amconmag.com/03_24_03/cover.html Links (for more information) on the Bamford and Buchanan books are included at the following URL (after the 'Timeline for War' write-up): http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2004/08/26/zionist-neocon-timeline-for-war.php Additional excellent panels on US/Israel are linked at the following URL: http://www.irmep.org Be sure to watch the Arab/Israel (USS Liberty) panel discussion (by scrolling down to the link for it at www.irmep.org ) at the US State Department this past January about the deliberate Israeli attack on the USS Liberty: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/military/20040217-9999-1n17liberty.html http://www.rense.com/Datapages/usslib.htm | |  | | Alpha | |  | | Alpha | | Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 10:58 am Post subject: Kerry Appoints AIPAC (Zionist) Jew as Top Mideast Adviser |
| Forwarded: The fourth paragraph illustrates why Kerry is more deadly than the moron Israel firster (Bush). Same ideas but Kerry will get allies to push forth his policies. ------------------- http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite? pagename=JPost/JPArticle/Printer&cid=1092626412132&p=1078113566627 Kerry appoints Mel Levine top Mideast adviser --------------------------------- Tom Tugend, THE JERUSALEM POST Aug. 16, 2004 --------------------------------- When Washington goes its own way and disrespects its allies, it hurts not only the United States, but Israel as well, insists Mel Levine. "Whenever America is diminished in the eyes of the world, it does Israel no favor," said Levine, who as John Kerry's newly appointed top adviser on the Middle East is expected to play a major role in shaping the Democrat's policy on region. During an interview in his law office, the former congressman from West Los Angeles was addressing himself to concerns that Kerry's advocacy of a multilateral US foreign policy might mean greater pressure on Israel for concessions to the Palestinians and surrounding Arab states. Not so, said Levine, "but if we cannot convince Europe, Russia and other countries to keep nuclear weapons away from Iran, to fight terrorism, and to exert greater leverage on Arab countries, we will fail," and thereby weaken Israel. To gauge Kerry's attitude toward Israel, one need only look at his votes during 20 years in the US Senate, according to Levine. "By every rating and criterion, Kerry's votes have shown 100 percent solid support for Israel," he said. "That's well understood in his home state of Massachusetts, but not yet throughout the rest of the country." Levine's appointment as chair of the Kerry campaign's Middle East Policy Working Group has been hailed by Jewish spokesmen and organizations as a reassurance that Israel's interests will have an eloquent voice in Kerry's inner circle. As congressman and member of the House foreign affairs committee from 1983 to 1993, Levine was among Israel's strongest supporters. His clashes with former Secretary of State James Baker on the Middle East policies of the first President Bush have become part of Washington folklore. Representing the US, Levine has also had considerable experience in dealing with the Arab side. At Vice President Al Gore's request, he served as co-president, with Arab-American James Zogby, of Builders for Peace, a private sector initiative to make the West Bank economy more competitive that, despite its good intentions, largely failed. Following the 1998 Wye Plantation accords, Levine chaired the US- Israel-Palestinian "anti-incitement" task force. He learned from this experience that incitement has to be confronted directly and aggressively, a lesson he is passing on to Kerry. Until recently, he served on the board of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), but has cut his activities in advocacy groups since becoming chairman of the non-political Community Relations Committee of the Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles. The Middle East Policy Working Group, said Levine, is not a formal committee with regular meetings and joint policy formulations. "I will be seeking informal and informed input from other members, and then render my advice," Levine said. He also believes that with Kerry's long service on the Senate foreign relations committee and his global outlook, "he won't need much policy guidance. Unlike other presidents, whose previous experiences were as state governors, Kerry will hit the ground running." When Jewish Republicans and Democrats argue the merits of their presidential candidates, and whether sizeable chunks of the overwhelmingly Democratic Jewish community will defect this time to President Bush, Republicans stress the incumbent's pro-Israel record. Democrats – while not conceding that their man is any less pro-Israel – emphasize the Bush administration's perceived domestic policy failures. Edward Sanders, an elder statesman of the Los Angeles and national Jewish communities, and who served as President Jimmy Carter's Middle East and Jewish relations adviser, has no doubt about his priorities. "I couldn't vote for a candidate who is good for Israel and bad on everything else," said the veteran Democrat and Kerry supporter. "What's good for a strong and respected United States is good for Israel." Levine acknowledges that the Democrats may not quite retain the 80 percent of the Jewish vote they got in the last presidential election, when they fielded Al Gore, a longtime friend of the Jewish community, and Jewish vice presidential candidate Joseph Lieberman. But with Bush and Kerry equally pro-Israel, in Levine's view, Jewish voters will come down overwhelmingly on Kerry's side on a wide range of domestic issues. "On the top of the list is church-state separation, and to say that the present administration has blurred the line is a significant understatement," said Levine. Other issues where Levine perceives serious Bush weaknesses include privacy rights, energy independence, woman's right to choose, health care, the environment, and preserving social services. Veteran Democratic Rep. Howard Berman of California has known Levine for some 27 years and sees the latter's appointment as "an obvious statement by Kerry that he will be a strong supporter of Israel and its security interests. Another longtime colleague, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Los Angeles) praised Kerry's ability to "translate his views into public policy." In a survey by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, leaders of major Jewish organizations such as AIPAC, the Anti-Defamation League, and the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations overwhelmingly endorsed the choice of Levine, though some noted that in the end it would be up to Kerry to act on Levine's recommendations. Levine said he would be an "active advocate" in the Kerry campaign, but declined to speculate on a future role in a Kerry administration. | |  | | Alpha | |  | | Alpha | |  | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |