| Author | Message | | Ed Toner | | Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2003 5:15 pm Post subject: Bush plans to re-draw map of Arabia |
| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The main reason that Pres. Bush wants Iraq now is oil. Lot's of oil, lot's of money for the already wealthy oil
empires which Bush and Cheney are part of.
We are told that Iraq possesses weapons of mass destruction which some has
escaped the eyes of all those inspectors for years now. Iraq has no Air
Force, no Navy, no means of delivering them even if it had them. Iraq has
only a small, demoralized infantry.
Why are we amassing such a huge force to whip a little defenseless third
world nation? Pres. Bush and his hawks have bigger things in mind, and
unless you have a computer and the time to search for what is behind all
this, you will not find the answers. The media is very timid of late, when
it comes to revealing what is going on.
From an Australian newspaper, The Sydney Morning Herald, I learned that an
Iraqi diplomat, Mohamed al-Jabiri, who has just returned from in talks with
Washington, said the White House has given its "blessing" to the head of the
Iraqi National Congress, Ahmed Chalabi, to lead a transitional coalition
government in Iraq once Saddam has been deposed.
Who is this Chalibi, and why does Pres. Bush want him to lead Iraq after we
finish mauling it, again? Previously, I had learned that Hamid Karzai, Pres. Bush's
choice to govern Iraq is the man who wants to use Afghanistan for a pipeline
as a segment to connect the riches of the undeveloped oilfields of the
Russian caucus basin to the Arabian Sea. The taliban turned down this idea,
and became out enemy, as did Hussein when he nationalized Iraq's oilfields.
Chalabi, the London-based leader of the Iraqi National Congress (INC), is
front man for the latest incarnation of a long-time strategy to redraw the
map of the oil-rich Middle East, put American troops -- and American oil
companies -- in full control of the Persian Gulf's reserves and use the Gulf
as a fulcrum for enhancing America's global strategic hegemony.
Chalabi would hand over Iraq's oil to U.S. multinationals, and his allies in
conservative think tanks are already drawing up the blueprints. "What they
have in mind is denationalization, and then parceling Iraqi oil out to
American oil companies," says James E. Akins, former U.S. ambassador to
Saudi Arabia. Even more broadly, once an occupying U.S. army seizes Baghdad,
Chalabi's INC and its American backers are spinning scenarios about
dismantling Saudi Arabia, seizing its oil and collapsing the Organization of
the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC).
What's also startling about these plans is that Chalabi is scorned by most
of America's national-security establishment, including much of the
Department of State, the CIA and the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He is shunned by
all Western powers save the United Kingdom, ostracized in the Arab world and
disdained even by many of his erstwhile comrades in the Iraqi opposition.
Among his few friends, however, are the men running the Bush
administration's willy-nilly war on Iraq. And with their backing, it's
conceivable that this hapless, exiled Iraqi aristocrat and London-Washington
playboy might end up atop the smoking heap of what's left of Iraq next year.
Almost to a man, Washington's chickenhawks lavishly praise Chalabi. "He's a
rare find," says Max Singer, a trustee and co-founder of the Hudson
Institute. In Washington, Team Chalabi is led by Deputy Secretary of
Defense Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle. Chalabi's cheerleaders include the
Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) and the Jewish Institute
for National Security Affairs (JINSA). "Chalabi is the one that we know the
best," says Shoshana Bryen, director of special projects for JINSA, where
Chalabi has been a frequent guest at board meetings, symposia and other
events since 1997. Chalibi is wanted in Jordan for embezzlement of millions
from the Petra bank. He was tried in absentia and sentenced to 22 years in
prison.
That's Pres. Bush and his new man in Baghdad, perfect together. Meanwhile
the taxpayers will finance this scheme to the tune of untold billions of
dollars, and pull it off with the loss of American troops. I'll bet nobody
ever read about this in our free press, or the TV news.
This all reminds me of a speech given by a Marine General, winner of 2
CMH's, Smedley Butler, who had this to say on interventionism:
Excerpt from a speech delivered in 1933, by Major General Smedley Butler,
USMC.
War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I believe, as
something that is not what it seems to the majority of
people. Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is
conducted for the benefit of the very few at the
expense of the masses.
I believe in adequate defense at the coastline and nothing else. If a
nation comes over here to fight, then we'll fight.
The trouble with America is that when the dollar only earns 6 percent
over here, then it gets restless and goes
overseas to get 100 percent. Then the flag follows the dollar and the
soldiers follow the flag.
I wouldn't go to war again as I have done to protect some lousy
investment of the bankers. There are only two
things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the
other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other
reason is simply a racket.
There isn't a trick in the racketeering bag that the military gang is
blind to. It has its "finger men" to point out
enemies, its "muscle men" to destroy enemies, its "brain men" to plan
war preparations, and a "Big Boss"
Super-Nationalistic-Capitalism.
It may seem odd for me, a military man to adopt such a comparison.
Truthfulness compels me to. I spent thirty-
three years and four months in active military service as a member of
this country's most agile military force, the
Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from Second Lieutenant
to Major-General. And during that
period, I spent most of my time being a high class muscle- man for Big
Business, for Wall Street and for the
Bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.
I suspected I was just part of a racket at the time. Now I am sure of
it. Like all the members of the military
profession, I never had a thought of my own until I left the service.
My mental faculties remained in suspended
animation while I obeyed the orders of higher-ups. This is typical with
everyone in the military service.
I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil
interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba
a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in.
I helped in the raping of half a dozen
Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record
of racketeering is long. I helped purify
Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in
1909-1912 (where have I heard that name
before?). I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar
interests in 1916. In China I helped to see
to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested.
During those years, I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a
swell racket. Looking back on it, I feel that I
could have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to
operate his racket in three districts. I
operated on three continents. | |  | | Anglo Thug | | Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2003 5:33 pm Post subject: |
| Ed,
This leads on to www.copvcia.com where you can find the fine details of such racketeering. Try the links page and recommended reading section to start drawing out a map of the criminal cartels hiding under a false democratic flag. Then there's this. Probably very outdated by now. You know how these gangland territories tend to shift around.
_________________
Please sign the petition to prosecute War Criminal Tony Blair | | | | Ed Toner | | Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2003 8:06 pm Post subject: |
| | Anglo Thug - Thanks | | | | Guest-400c | | Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2003 12:49 am Post subject: Re: Bush plans to re-draw map of Arabia |
| | Guest-4427 wrote: | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The main reason that Pres. Bush wants Iraq now is oil. Lot's of oil, lot's of money for the already wealthy oil
empires which Bush and Cheney are part of.
We are told that Iraq possesses weapons of mass destruction which some has
escaped the eyes of all those inspectors for years now. Iraq has no Air
Force, no Navy, no means of delivering them even if it had them. Iraq has
only a small, demoralized infantry.
Why are we amassing such a huge force to whip a little defenseless third
world nation? Pres. Bush and his hawks have bigger things in mind, and
unless you have a computer and the time to search for what is behind all
this, you will not find the answers. The media is very timid of late, when
it comes to revealing what is going on.
From an Australian newspaper, The Sydney Morning Herald, I learned that an
Iraqi diplomat, Mohamed al-Jabiri, who has just returned from in talks with
Washington, said the White House has given its "blessing" to the head of the
Iraqi National Congress, Ahmed Chalabi, to lead a transitional coalition
government in Iraq once Saddam has been deposed.
Who is this Chalibi, and why does Pres. Bush want him to lead Iraq after we
finish mauling it, again? Previously, I had learned that Hamid Karzai, Pres. Bush's
choice to govern Iraq is the man who wants to use Afghanistan for a pipeline
as a segment to connect the riches of the undeveloped oilfields of the
Russian caucus basin to the Arabian Sea. The taliban turned down this idea,
and became out enemy, as did Hussein when he nationalized Iraq's oilfields.
Chalabi, the London-based leader of the Iraqi National Congress (INC), is
front man for the latest incarnation of a long-time strategy to redraw the
map of the oil-rich Middle East, put American troops -- and American oil
companies -- in full control of the Persian Gulf's reserves and use the Gulf
as a fulcrum for enhancing America's global strategic hegemony.
Chalabi would hand over Iraq's oil to U.S. multinationals, and his allies in
conservative think tanks are already drawing up the blueprints. "What they
have in mind is denationalization, and then parceling Iraqi oil out to
American oil companies," says James E. Akins, former U.S. ambassador to
Saudi Arabia. Even more broadly, once an occupying U.S. army seizes Baghdad,
Chalabi's INC and its American backers are spinning scenarios about
dismantling Saudi Arabia, seizing its oil and collapsing the Organization of
the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC).
What's also startling about these plans is that Chalabi is scorned by most
of America's national-security establishment, including much of the
Department of State, the CIA and the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He is shunned by
all Western powers save the United Kingdom, ostracized in the Arab world and
disdained even by many of his erstwhile comrades in the Iraqi opposition.
Among his few friends, however, are the men running the Bush
administration's willy-nilly war on Iraq. And with their backing, it's
conceivable that this hapless, exiled Iraqi aristocrat and London-Washington
playboy might end up atop the smoking heap of what's left of Iraq next year.
Almost to a man, Washington's chickenhawks lavishly praise Chalabi. "He's a
rare find," says Max Singer, a trustee and co-founder of the Hudson
Institute. In Washington, Team Chalabi is led by Deputy Secretary of
Defense Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle. Chalabi's cheerleaders include the
Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) and the Jewish Institute
for National Security Affairs (JINSA). "Chalabi is the one that we know the
best," says Shoshana Bryen, director of special projects for JINSA, where
Chalabi has been a frequent guest at board meetings, symposia and other
events since 1997. Chalibi is wanted in Jordan for embezzlement of millions
from the Petra bank. He was tried in absentia and sentenced to 22 years in
prison.
That's Pres. Bush and his new man in Baghdad, perfect together. Meanwhile
the taxpayers will finance this scheme to the tune of untold billions of
dollars, and pull it off with the loss of American troops. I'll bet nobody
ever read about this in our free press, or the TV news.
This all reminds me of a speech given by a Marine General, winner of 2
CMH's, Smedley Butler, who had this to say on interventionism:
Excerpt from a speech delivered in 1933, by Major General Smedley Butler,
USMC.
War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I believe, as
something that is not what it seems to the majority of
people. Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is
conducted for the benefit of the very few at the
expense of the masses.
I believe in adequate defense at the coastline and nothing else. If a
nation comes over here to fight, then we'll fight.
The trouble with America is that when the dollar only earns 6 percent
over here, then it gets restless and goes
overseas to get 100 percent. Then the flag follows the dollar and the
soldiers follow the flag.
I wouldn't go to war again as I have done to protect some lousy
investment of the bankers. There are only two
things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the
other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other
reason is simply a racket.
There isn't a trick in the racketeering bag that the military gang is
blind to. It has its "finger men" to point out
enemies, its "muscle men" to destroy enemies, its "brain men" to plan
war preparations, and a "Big Boss"
Super-Nationalistic-Capitalism.
It may seem odd for me, a military man to adopt such a comparison.
Truthfulness compels me to. I spent thirty-
three years and four months in active military service as a member of
this country's most agile military force, the
Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from Second Lieutenant
to Major-General. And during that
period, I spent most of my time being a high class muscle- man for Big
Business, for Wall Street and for the
Bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.
I suspected I was just part of a racket at the time. Now I am sure of
it. Like all the members of the military
profession, I never had a thought of my own until I left the service.
My mental faculties remained in suspended
animation while I obeyed the orders of higher-ups. This is typical with
everyone in the military service.
I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil
interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba
a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in.
I helped in the raping of half a dozen
Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record
of racketeering is long. I helped purify
Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in
1909-1912 (where have I heard that name
before?). I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar
interests in 1916. In China I helped to see
to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested.
During those years, I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a
swell racket. Looking back on it, I feel that I
could have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to
operate his racket in three districts. I
operated on three continents. |
JINSA Behind Drive To Cover-Up Israel Spy Scandal:
JINSA (Jewish Institute of National Security Affairs) is the same cabal of Israel Firsters (of whom chicken hawks Dick Cheney, Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz are associated) which has hijacked the Bush regime and is driving us to the coming war on Islam (beginning with the invasion of Iraq) for Israel and oil (as the JINSA Israel First agenda is going to increase the risk of US experiencing further terror attacks in the UK and USA as well as in Europe):
JINSA Behind Drive To
Cover-Up Israeli Spy Scandal
http://www.rense.com/general18/JINSA.htm
JINSA Behind Drive To
Cover-Up Israeli Spy Scandal
Executive Intelligence Review News Service
1-6-2
(EIRNS) - One of the "Mega" agencies that mobilized to quash the Fox TV pick-up of our Israeli spy scandal was JINSA, the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs. JINSA President and CEO David Steinmann is also a director of CAMERA (Committee for Accurate Middle East Reporting in America), the group that actually staged the e-mail, fax, letter, and phone call mobilization that squeezed Fox TV, to the point that they removed the transcripts of the four Carl Cameron segments from their own web site. While CAMERA lists Tom Lantos among its advisors, along with Sharon cabinet minister Natan Sharansky, it is JINSA that is the real hotbed of "Mega" and "X Committee" clout, particular inside the Pentagon. On its own website, JINSA boasts that "Only one think tank puts the U.S.-Israel strategic relationship {first} -- JINSA!" JINSA lists among its directors: Richard Perle, Steven Bryen (whose wife, Shoshana Bryen is still one of the few full-time JINSA employees), Max Kampelman, Jeanne Kirkpatrick, Jack Kemp, Michael Ledeen, Joshua Muravchik, Kenneth Timmermann, and James Woolsey. Beyond these hardcore "X Committee" operatives, JINSA's board also includes a dozen or more retired flag grade U.S. military officers, including Lt. Gen. Anthony Burshnick (USAF), Gen. Crosbie Saint (USA), Maj. Gen. Lee Downer (USAF), Adm. Leon Edney (USN), Gen. John Foss (USA), Adm. David Jeremiah (USN), Adm. Jerome Johnson (USN), Maj. Gen. Jarvis Lynch (USMC), Rear Adm. Sumner Shapiro (USN). JINSA makes no bones about the fact that it is recruiting an Israeli fifth column inside the U.S. military command. They sponsor frequent all-expense-paid junkets to Israel for retired officers, which are co-sponsored by the Israeli Defense Force; they run an exchange program for military academy cadets at West Point, Annapolis and the Air Force Academy with military institutes in Israel; and they host lecture programs at all the military institutions in the U.S. where they bring in top IDF and Israeli intelligence officials. One of the top figures on the JINSA lecture circuit is Dore Gold, who is a top aide to Sharon and is about to come to Washington as the Israeli ambassador. JINSA's output of policy papers and press releases also makes clear that they are leading proponents of the "Clash of Civilizations," and the drive to lure the U.S. into a suicidal military alliance with an Israeli marcher lord state. Typical of JINSA's operations of late are their sponsorship of a series of lectures by Iraqi National Congress honcho Chulabi, and their Sept. 13 press statement, calling for the U.S. to "go beyond bin Laden" to launch military attacks against Iraq, Iran, Pakistan, Syria, Sudan, the Palestinian Authority, Libya, Algeria, "and even our presumed friends Saudi Arabia and Egypt." The release demanded that the U.S. bomb Beirut and Damascus, cut military aid to Egypt, and revoke the Presidential ban on assassinations. | | | | Alpha | | Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2003 12:27 pm Post subject: Ed, Where Did You See the Article? |
| Hi Ed,
Where did you see that article? Could you post it in full version to this message thread? | | | | Ed Toner | | Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2003 12:59 pm Post subject: |
| Alpha - The thread opener by me was made up from several sources, including my own thoughts, starting with the Sydney newspaper identifying Ahmed Chalabi as Bush's choice for Gov. of Iraq.
I searched Ahmed Chalabi, which let to other stories.
I hope that explains it. | | | | Guest-c651 | | Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2003 9:37 am Post subject: |
| | Guest-4427 wrote: | Alpha - The thread opener by me was made up from several sources, including my own thoughts, starting with the Sydney newspaper identifying Ahmed Chalabi as Bush's choice for Gov. of Iraq.
I searched Ahmed Chalabi, which let to other stories.
I hope that explains it. |
Do you have a link for the Sydney article as I would very like to read.. Read what is mentioned about Chalabi at the URL referenced below:
JINSA ZIONIST EXTREMISTS ALSO AFTER N. KOREA
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2003/02/08/jinsa-jewish-zionist-wrote-axis-of-evil-speech.php | | | | Ed Toner | | | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |
