| Author | Message | | Guest-c651 | | Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2003 6:34 am Post subject: U.S. + ISRAEL + U.K. TO ENFORCE 'New World Order' |
| Here's what Mark Bruzonsky has to say about Israeli/US relations...
Bruzonsky has been Associate Editor of WORLDVIEW MAGAZINE in New York and Interview Editor of THE MIDDLE EAST MAGAZINE in London. He was Washington Representative of The World Jewish Congress from 1977 to 1984, and Special Assistant to Philip M. Klutznick (the only person to ever be President of both B'nai B'rith International and the World Jewish Congress, as well as U.S. Secretary of Commerce) for over a decade.
Mark Writes:
ISRAEL REELECTS SHARON
PREPARATIONS FOR 'TRANSFER' UNDERWAY
U.S. + ISRAEL + U.K. TO ENFORCE 'New World Order'
MID-EAST REALITIES - MER - www.MiddleEast.Org - Washington - 28 January 2003: This evening even before the worldly-retarded boy-like George W. Bush gives his 'State of the Union' address from the American Capitol to the world, the ethically-challenged brut-thug Ariel Sharon is likely to have already delivered his victory speech from Israel to the world. And have no doubt about it, as MER has pointed out for some years now, the U.S. and Israel, and Bush and Sharon personally, are working closely in tandem on this crusade to create and enforce a 'New World Order' of military and technological subjugation and domination. Indeed, were it not for the powerful and deeply entrenched influence of what we call the 'Israeli-Jewish lobby' in Washington, the U.S. would not be so twisted and misguided as it is; for how the Israelis press and influence and manipulate politics and media in the U.S., and especially affairs in Washington, is one of the taboo subjects in contemporary America. Indeed, were it not for Israel's increasingly apartheid-style occupation of the Palestinian people 9/11 probably would not have occurred with today's result. Indeed, if it were not for the huge arsenal of weapons of mass destruction accumulated by Israel, or course with ongoing U.S. help and financing, today's historic arms race throughout the Middle East region would not have taken the course it has.
Wednesday's headlines of course will feature what we will call at this point the well-polished rantings of Bush and Sharon; and certainly in the crucial United States the underlying truths and historical realities that have brought our world to this turning-point moment will hardly be mentioned by the 'mainstream (i.e., corporate) media'. Meanwhile, as we all are forced to prepare for the still greater and potentially catastrophic storms now brewing, these important articles about how depressed and on-edge today's Jewish State of Israel has become. Just as in years past -- think back to the period before the 1967 war -- this economic and psychological situation is an important part of today's overall 'prelude to war' saga. www.MiddleEast.Org Phone: 202 362-5266 Fax: 815 366-0800 Email: MER@MiddleEast.Org | |  | | Guest-c651 | | | | Guest-c651 | | | | Guest-c651 | | | | Guest-c651 | | | | Guest-c651 | | | | Guest-c651 | | Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2003 8:40 am Post subject: Wolfowitz Influenced Bush "State of the Union" Spe |
| It was just mentioned on MSNBC (by Chris Matthews) that what President Bush Jr. said (in the "State of the Union" speech tonight) about going on a "freedom" crusade to "install" democracies around the world is exactly what (JINSA Zionist Jew extremist) Paul Wolfowitz discusses privately, so the Wolfowitz/Perle/Cheney JINSA Zionist extremist cabal that has hijacked the Bush regime is driving us to war (and potential world war eventually). Please read the following ("Life of an American Jew in Racist/Marxist Israel" by American Jew Jack Bernstein who the Mossad assassinated in Jerusalem) to see how it is mentioned that the Zionists manipulate to get others to fight wars for them (like what is going to happen for the Israelis in the coming invasion of Iraq):
Here is the direct link (URL) to Bernstein's article:
http://www.rense.com/general31/lifeof.htm
The Life Of An American Jew
In Racist-Marxist Israel
By Jack Bernstein
© 1984 by Jack Bernstein and Leonard (Len) Martin | | | | Guest-cdbc | | Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2003 5:48 am Post subject: PILGER: BLAIR IS A COWARD |
| http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.cfm?objectid=12581179&method=full&siteid=50143
PILGER: BLAIR IS A COWARD
William Russell, the great correspondent who reported the carnage of imperial wars, may have first used the expression "blood on his hands" to describe impeccable politicians who, at a safe distance, order the mass killing of ordinary people.
In my experience "on his hands" applies especially to those modern political leaders who have had no personal experience of war, like George W Bush, who managed not to serve in Vietnam, and the effete Tony Blair.
There is about them the essential cowardice of the man who causes death and suffering not by his own hand but through a chain of command that affirms his "authority".
In 1946 the judges at Nuremberg who tried the Nazi leaders for war crimes left no doubt about what they regarded as the gravest crimes against humanity.
The most serious was unprovoked invasion of a sovereign state that offered no threat to one's homeland. Then there was the murder of civilians, for which responsibility rested with the "highest authority".
Blair is about to commit both these crimes, for which he is being denied even the flimsiest United Nations cover now that the weapons inspectors have found, as one put it, "zilch".
Like those in the dock at Nuremberg, he has no democratic cover.
Using the archaic "royal prerogative" he did not consult parliament or the people when he dispatched 35,000 troops and ships and aircraft to the Gulf; he consulted a foreign power, the Washington regime.
Unelected in 2000, the Washington regime of George W Bush is now totalitarian, captured by a clique whose fanaticism and ambitions of "endless war" and "full spectrum dominance" are a matter of record.
All the world knows their names: Bush, Rumsfeld, Rice, Wolfowitz, Cheney and Perle, and Powell, the false liberal. Bush's State of the Union speech last night was reminiscent of that other great moment in 1938 when Hitler called his generals together and told them: "I must have war." He then had it.
To call Blair a mere "poodle" is to allow him distance from the killing of innocent Iraqi men, women and children for which he will share responsibility.
He is the embodiment of the most dangerous appeasement humanity has known since the 1930s. The current American elite is the Third Reich of our times, although this distinction ought not to let us forget that they have merely accelerated more than half a century of unrelenting American state terrorism: from the atomic bombs dropped cynically on Japan as a signal of their new power to the dozens of countries invaded, directly or by proxy, to destroy democracy wherever it collided with American "interests", such as a voracious appetite for the world's resources, like oil.
When you next hear Blair or Straw or Bush talk about "bringing democracy to the people of Iraq", remember that it was the CIA that installed the Ba'ath Party in Baghdad from which emerged Saddam Hussein.
YELLOW: Tony Blair and George Bush
"That was my favourite coup," said the CIA man responsible. When you next hear Blair and Bush talking about a "smoking gun" in Iraq, ask why the US government last December confiscated the 12,000 pages of Iraq's weapons declaration, saying they contained "sensitive information" which needed "a little editing".
Sensitive indeed. The original Iraqi documents listed 150 American, British and other foreign companies that supplied Iraq with its nuclear, chemical and missile technology, many of them in illegal transactions. In 2000 Peter Hain, then a Foreign Office Minister, blocked a parliamentary request to publish the full list of lawbreaking British companies. He has never explained why.
As a reporter of many wars I am constantly aware that words on the page like these can seem almost abstract, part of a great chess game unconnected to people's lives.
The most vivid images I carry make that connection. They are the end result of orders given far away by the likes of Bush and Blair, who never see, or would have the courage to see, the effect of their actions on ordinary lives: the blood on their hands.
Let me give a couple of examples. Waves of B52 bombers will be used in the attack on Iraq. In Vietnam, where more than a million people were killed in the American invasion of the 1960s, I once watched three ladders of bombs curve in the sky, falling from B52s flying in formation, unseen above the clouds.
They dropped about 70 tons of explosives that day in what was known as the "long box" pattern, the military term for carpet bombing. Everything inside a "box" was presumed destroyed.
When I reached a village within the "box", the street had been replaced by a crater.
I slipped on the severed shank of a buffalo and fell hard into a ditch filled with pieces of limbs and the intact bodies of children thrown into the air by the blast.
The children's skin had folded back, like parchment, revealing veins and burnt flesh that seeped blood, while the eyes, intact, stared straight ahead. A small leg had been so contorted by the blast that the foot seemed to be growing from a shoulder. I vomited.
I am being purposely graphic. This is what I saw, and often; yet even in that "media war" I never saw images of these grotesque sights on television or in the pages of a newspaper.
I saw them only pinned on the wall of news agency offices in Saigon as a kind of freaks' gallery.
SOME years later I often came upon terribly deformed Vietnamese children in villages where American aircraft had sprayed a herbicide called Agent Orange.
It was banned in the United States, not surprisingly for it contained Dioxin, the deadliest known poison.
This terrible chemical weapon, which the cliche-mongers would now call a weapon of mass destruction, was dumped on almost half of South Vietnam.
Today, as the poison continues to move through water and soil and food, children continue to be born without palates and chins and scrotums or are stillborn. Many have leukaemia.
You never saw these children on the TV news then; they were too hideous for their pictures, the evidence of a great crime, even to be pinned up on a wall and they are old news now.
That is the true face of war. Will you be shown it by satellite when Iraq is attacked? I doubt it.
I was starkly reminded of the children of Vietnam when I travelled in Iraq two years ago. A paediatrician showed me hospital wards of children similarly deformed: a phenomenon unheard of prior to the Gulf war in 1991.
She kept a photo album of those who had died, their smiles undimmed on grey little faces. Now and then she would turn away and wipe her eyes.
More than 300 tons of depleted uranium, another weapon of mass destruction, were fired by American aircraft and tanks and possibly by the British.
Many of the rounds were solid uranium which, inhaled or ingested, causes cancer. In a country where dust carries everything, swirling through markets and playgrounds, children are especially vulnerable.
For 12 years Iraq has been denied specialist equipment that would allow its engineers to decontaminate its southern battlefields.
It has also been denied equipment and drugs that would identify and treat the cancer which, it is estimated, will affect almost half the population in the south.
LAST November Jeremy Corbyn MP asked the Junior Defence Minister Adam Ingram what stocks of weapons containing depleted uranium were held by British forces operating in Iraq.
His robotic reply was: "I am withholding details in accordance with Exemption 1 of the Code of Practice on Access to Government Information."
Let us be clear about what the Bush-Blair attack will do to our fellow human beings in a country already stricken by an embargo run by America and Britain and aimed not at Saddam Hussein but at the civilian population, who are denied even vaccines for the children. Last week the Pentagon in Washington announced matter of factly that it intended to shatter Iraq "physically, emotionally and psychologically" by raining down on its people 800 cruise missiles in two days.
This will be more than twice the number of missiles launched during the entire 40 days of the 1991 Gulf War.
A military strategist named Harlan Ullman told American television: "There will not be a safe place in Baghdad. The sheer size of this has never been seen before, never been contemplated before."
The strategy is known as Shock and Awe and Ullman is apparently its proud inventor. He said: "You have this simultaneous effect, rather like the nuclear weapons at Hiroshima, not taking days or weeks but minutes."
What will his "Hiroshima effect" actually do to a population of whom almost half are children under the age of 14?
The answer is to be found in a "confidential" UN document, based on World Health Organisation estimates, which says that "as many as 500,000 people could require treatment as a result of direct and indirect injuries".
A Bush-Blair attack will destroy "a functioning primary health care system" and deny clean water to 39 per cent of the population. There is "likely [to be] an outbreak of diseases in epidemic if not pandemic proportions".
It is Washington's utter disregard for humanity, I believe, together with Blair's lies that have turned most people in this country against them, including people who have not protested before.
Last weekend Blair said there was no need for the UN weapons inspectors to find a "smoking gun" for Iraq to be attacked.
Compare that with his reassurance in October 2001 that there would be no "wider war" against Iraq unless there was "absolute evidence" of Iraqi complicity in September 11. And there has been no evidence.
Blair's deceptions are too numerous to list here. He has lied about the nature and effect of the embargo on Iraq by covering up the fact that Washington, with Britain's support, is withholding more than $5billion worth of humanitarian supplies approved by the Security Council.
He has lied about Iraq buying aluminium tubes, which he told Parliament were "needed to enrich uranium". The International Atomic Energy Agency has denied this outright.
He has lied about an Iraqi "threat", which he discovered only following September 11 2001 when Bush made Iraq a gratuitous target of his "war on terror". Blair's "Iraq dossier" has been mocked by human rights groups.
However, what is wonderful is that across the world the sheer force of public opinion isolates Bush and Blair and their lemming, John Howard in Australia.
So few people believe them and support them that The Guardian this week went in search of the few who do - "the hawks". The paper published a list of celebrity warmongers, some apparently shy at describing their contortion of intellect and morality. It is a small list.
IN CONTRAST the majority of people in the West, including the United States, are now against this gruesome adventure and the numbers grow every day.
It is time MPs joined their constituents and reclaimed the true authority of parliament. MPs like Tam Dalyell, Alice Mahon, Jeremy Corbyn and George Galloway have stood alone for too long on this issue and there have been too many sham debates manipulated by Downing Street.
If, as Galloway says, a majority of Labour backbenchers are against an attack, let them speak up now.
Blair's figleaf of a "coalition" is very important to Bush and only the moral power of the British people can bring the troops home without them firing a shot.
The consequences of not speaking out go well beyond an attack on Iraq. Washington will effectively take over the Middle East, ensuring an age of terrorism other than their own.
The next American attack is likely to be Iran - the Israelis want this - and their aircraft are already in place in Turkey. Then it may be China's turn.
"Endless war" is Vice-President Cheney's contribution to our understanding.
Bush has said he will use nuclear weapons "if necessary". On March 26 last Geoffrey Hoon said that other countries "can be absolutely confident that in the right conditions we would be willing to use our nuclear weapons".
Such madness is the true enemy. What's more, it is right here at home and you, the British people, can stop it.
On Saturday, February 15, a great demonstration against an attack on Iraq will be held in London.
Contact the Stop the War Coalition on 07951 235 915 and office@stopwar.org.uk | | | | Guest-cdbc | | Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2003 6:05 am Post subject: LET THE JEWS' (Zionist Extremists') WAR BEGIN |
| I saw this post on another message thread as it fits on this message thread as well:
LET THE JEWS' (JINSA Zionist Extremists') WAR BEGIN
The vast majority of Americans have been silenced, and before very long, B-52 mega-death machines will be screaming across the Iraqi sky. All any of us can do now is wait for the Jews' War to begin, and hope that others awaken to the reality that anti-Semitism - speech that questions the methods and motives of Jews, specifically with regard to the Middle East - has become a moral imperative in our lifetime.
If we are to save ourselves from the Jewish "Perpetual War" on Islam, Americans will need to identify and question Jewish control of our government foreign policy. More American journalists will have to question their harness. They will have to revolt. So far, only a few brave souls, here and in Canada, have risked their careers, to write about and rebel against the Jewish bias that poisons the information business.
We are a nation in lockdown. I've said it. More than once. Nothing has changed. The appetites of well-placed Jews, and with ever-higher stakes, are directing events that might end the world as we know it. Any writer who questions this arrangement will be tagged, extruded, and dumped into a history bin marked DANGER - DO NOT EMPLOY.
Americans are going to die if we continue to participate in the genocide of Palestinians and Iraqis. We pay for their death. Americans underwrite the occupation, the subjugation, and exploitation of Arab populations. Jews in the information business successfully redefined Arab anger as hostility toward 'freedom' and 'democracy', even as Jews restrict any debate on this proclamation. They own the venues, so they also define the information flow. There are few dissenting voices in the American press. The majority has been blacklisted into submission.
This, while our Israeli "allies" wait in eager anticipation, for new, desperate acts of her victims - this time, aimed at Americans. When more gentiles perish at the hands of Muslims, Israel will be redeemed.
Our president warns the enslaved Palistinians -- RESISTANCE IS FUTILE - forget your dead - do not fight back - you cannot win - some day, if you are good, Jews will let you have your own government, operated by Jews.
The Northeast is onboard. Falwell and Robertson have sanctified Armageddon. And the liberal/left shrieks "No Blood For Oil!", the perfect misdirection play for the pigskin players.
That said, there is still a long-term downside for this Jewish strategy, but not before they cost us a fortune, and get more of our sons and daughters killed for their war.
Jews don't die in the wars they cause, in anywhere near the proportions they claim. But they do a hell of a job manufacturing the perceptions that nudge others to sign up and die.
The stats on the under representation of dead Jewish soldiers in WWII and Vietnam is damning. But so long as Jews control the venues and future job prospects for journalists willing to plumb the subject, America will remain in an information lockdown.
The Ameri/Israeli apocalyptic suicide pact is about to commence. And, yet, I still think Jews are the ultimate losers now that they have been forced to turn over too many cards, revealing the sinister underbelly of their enterprise.
The unreported story is that Jews control the agenda and media, as they hurl the world into an anti-Islamic frenzy and WWIII, WWIV, WWV... These are not the wild-eyed claims of pasty faced, goose stepping demons.
Yet there are glimmers of hope. Jews can't seem to keep control of the discussion overseas and on Internet news. Jews ARE the subjects. And I don't think Jonah Goldberg and Thomas Friedman and Norm Podhoretz are going to put that unpleasant reality back into the bottle. Average Americans are beginning to question the paranoid ravings of Jews who equate worldwide revulsion for Israel with religious bigotry.
Jews have few friends because they are not friendly to their friends. Abe Foxman describes Euro Anti-Israel feelings as "repressed hostility". Where did you first read this? Maybe Abe is reading Carolontheweb as well - I actually referred to it as passive aggression.
Norwegians post signs on goods from Israel, to warn consumers who don't want to support Israel. In this case, YES, I agree with Abe. It's repressed hostility, and passive aggression. Why not? Jews organize boycotts all the time. They ruin the careers of critics and whole populations.
Denmark, whose WWII King declared: "All Danes shall wear the yellow Star of David", a fierce rebuke to the Nazis, is now thisclose to severing all relations with Israel. The same for Sweden, Switzerland, Holland, Belgium, Finland, Switzerland, and Norway.
Foul harpies like Jeff Jacoby decry Norwegian activism as a precursor to yellow stars and extermination camps. Yet, Jews blacklist people and products, with nary a condemnation, because they allow no dissent. They control the venue, the demonization, and the outcome. That, Abe, is what causes repressed hostility in those who are subject to the double standard.
It's pretty simple. A + B = C - Abe.
Arabs don't have enough defenders to manipulate public opinion against the Israelis. Jews do quite well for themselves in that regard. My guess is that Jews have and will continue to overplay their hand. AND without a LARGE refresher course in terrorism - brought to some city - selected for the maximum impact on the anti-war left - America will continue her passive resistance to enlarging the war.
Let's watch -- and pray that Israeli Art Students and Urban Moving companies are under increased surveillance, or out of commission. We have a lot of forests, reservoirs, railways, pipelines and streams that cannot be protected from the Mossad. And Americans are woefully ill-prepared to identify the real enemies in their midst.
Israel needs allies. Her American cousins are working feverishly to deliver some. We need to speak up publicly about the occupation of our nation and presidency.
Washington is enemy-occupied territory. Ditto for the The N.Y. Times, Wall street Journa, and all the major networks.. Watch the Weekly Standard demean and undercut their own president, goading him into subservience before the real gods - the self-chosen. If Bush does not deliver Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt, the Jewish enemy within will cut his legs from under him. .
The Honest Brokers
If we want honest commentary about War & Jews - we must now look to the Nation, PBS, The London Observer, and Guardian. Only the left is resisting the apocalyptic dreams of Jews.
Fox News is occupied territory, preening over their coup in Tel Aviv since Ted Turner dared to speak for Palis. The Republican Party is lost to gentiles, beholden to the evangelical "Armageddon Christian-Zionist" rightwing. The flock enraptured by false prophets like Pat Robertson, would applaud if Israel nuked Hawaii. Plus, 40% of ALL CONTRIBUITIONS to the Republican party is Jewish money. The Dems are completely in their pocket. Last year alone, the prominent Jewish lobbies gave over 30 million dollars to the U.S. Senate, alone.
I called America Sobibor West. Only Libertarians and the American Left remain on the front lines, fighting the occupation. Until 'mainstream' journalists muster the starch to write the story behind the story, we are doomed to bid for our Jewish Masters.
The good news is that Anti-Semitism is becoming a moral imperative. In each society, and in every culture, for thousands of years, Jews have made themselves so morally repulsive and dangerous to the cultural and economic well being of their neighbors, that 80 years is their limit before mass expulsion - or worse. They have been here over 90.
They have had a good run in America. They milked their holocaust claims for advantage, positioning themselves as moral arbiters, here and in much of Europe. But as I cautioned before, the Jew has been forced to turn over too many cards since 9/11.
Americans will continue to be terrorized in print to keep us agitated. We will beg for more chains to protect us from the desperate acts of enemies we didn't choose. But one by one, victims of Jews are finding ears to hear, and a voice apart from the Jewish press.
I think there is something to the claim that Jews are condemned to walk alone. Incapable of reciprocity or honest fellowship toward the non-Jew, they rack up new enemies in each succeeding generation.
I've said all of this before. When things change, I'll be back to say some more. In the mean time, speak up, speak out, and don't be afraid to resist the Masters of Discourse. They cannot be allowed their boundless, materialistic appetites, or the civilized world will be diminished by their guardianship. Look at the ethnicity of those who push for gun control, who clamor for lesbian adoptions, and who've made it a crime to smoke one lousy cigarette. These are the acts of Jews, hostile to American culture, yet unidentified as Jews in press reports.
And lastly, readers should write a note of thanks to any Middle Eastern paper. Thank you Islam, for your supreme sacrifice. It is the Muslim that finally said ENOUGH. Life is not worth living if it is to be lived as a slave to the Jews.
Thank you Mohammed. Only through the conviction and self-sacrifice of your followers, will our generation be freed from the dehumanizing values of Jews.
The Gospel Singer | | | | Guest-cdbc | | Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2003 11:46 pm Post subject: PNAC Group....the List of players |
| Subj: Re: PNAC Group....the List of players
Date: 1/31/03 6:20:51 AM Pacific Standard Time
On October 1 of last year, I sent out the following e-mail. I don't have the time to sort out which of you were on my list at that time, so please bear with me if you've seen this already:
Iraq invasion plan written in September 2000 -- BEFORE Bush was "elected"
Bush's new 'global domination' policy is based almost verbatim on a policy written up by PNAC (Project for a New American Century) as found on http://www.newamericancentury.org
It's available for download (for now) and includes all the Bush administration's newly adopted military stances (preemptive strikes, military presence in the Gulf, antiterrorist philosophies, American global domination, etc.).
It should be required reading for all Americans, as well as anyone who believes that Bush is only acting in response to 9/11.
The actual report is at http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf. I've attached it to this e-mail.
One revealing quote is:
"The United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American forces presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein."
Looks like they got their wish. The group was formed in 1997 as a response to Clinton's second term, and the membership list reads like a who's who of the Right Wing:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm
It includes security advisors going back to Nixon, characters from Iran-Contra, the so-called drug wars, Christian Values groups, Jewish and Israeli lobbyists (not to mention Christian and Jewish coalition groups), and 'Family Value' zealots who led the charge against Clinton during the Lewinsky debacle.
It features the heads of Lockheed, Boeing, and other military suppliers and contractors. Also included are senior editors of the major right-leaning publications, as well as current staffers of the Bush administration (including Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, and convicted Iran-Contra felon Elliott Abrams).
Amazingly, it also boasts the membership of Jeb Bush, NOT his simpleton 'fool me once' brother -- guess that explains the recent events in Florida (including the theft of the 2000 election in the first place). Also featured is Zalmay Khalilzad who was a paid spokesman for UNOCAL, was pivotal in setting up meetings with the Taliban, and who later gave testimony that Afghanistan needed to be 'converted' into a more US-friendly (read: oil) environment in hearings in March 2000. His supervisor at one point was Condoleeza Rice!
These are the people pulling Bush's strings. And BTW - the guys who were supposed responsible for the lax security on 9/11 (i.e., the 'acting' head of the CIA) are also prominently featured.
Want to really freak out? Run the lesser-known names on the members page through Google. You will NOT believe what you come up with. | | | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |
