| Author | Message | | Anglo Thug | | Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2003 3:13 am Post subject: Re: 2 Anglo |
| | Meranda wrote: | Anglo: I'm curious, did you download the nerdcities stuff.
It is quite well presented.
I think the stuff on Israel/Palestine is very interesting.
I now have lots of online books to read. |
Not yet :wink:
_________________
Please sign the petition to prosecute War Criminal Tony Blair | |  | | Guest-43f8 | | Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2003 4:12 am Post subject: |
| | Guest-3efd wrote: | | Quote: | | And how would that controlled demolition have been done? Where would the explosives have been placed? |
You tell us, Mutt. You're the engineer aren't you? Go ahead. |
I already told you how the towers went down.
I want to hear what theory is being presented here.
If it was a controlled demolition, where did the explosion occur? | | | | Guest-d256 | | Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2003 10:03 am Post subject: |
| | Guest-43f8 wrote: | | Guest-3efd wrote: | | And how would that controlled demolition have been done? Where would the explosives have been placed? | |
Most of the World Trade Center changed hands in a $3.2 billion, 99-year lease deal that was concluded only seven weeks before the World Trade Center attack; with a sweetheart tax deal and new insurance covering buildings and rents - payable to new beneficiaries.
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey signed the deal with the Silverstein-led Westfield America on the 26th April, 2001. Westfield America leased the concourse mall, and [Larry] Silverstein the office portion.
The deal was finalized and celebrated on the 23rd July - just seven weeks before almost the entire complex was destroyed. Port Authority officers gave a giant set of keys to the complex to Silverstein and to Westfield CEO Lowy.
Silverstein was ecstatic at that time. "This is a dream come true," he had said. "We will be in control of a prized asset, and we will seek to develop its potential, raising it to new heights." An ironic choice of words, in retrospect.
From The World Trade Center Demolition http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wtc.html
Also see http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wot/insurers.htm
Seven weeks total control of the WTC complex by Silverstein and friends is ample time to lace the central core with explosives. | | | | Anglo Thug | | Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2003 10:40 am Post subject: |
| | Guest-43f8 wrote: | | Guest-3efd wrote: | | Quote: | | And how would that controlled demolition have been done? Where would the explosives have been placed? |
You tell us, Mutt. You're the engineer aren't you? Go ahead. |
I already told you how the towers went down.
I want to hear what theory is being presented here.
If it was a controlled demolition, where did the explosion occur? |
"If you want a gut reaction, WTC7 looks like a controlled demolition. When I say that, I can only compare it to other demolitions I have witnessed (mostly on TV). It could be that things happened exactly as explained by FEMA. I'm not in a position to judge scientifically. Like every lay person I am forced to accept that FEMA's version of events represents the official line and it is highly unlikely that any genuine investigation will ever be conducted to provide conclusive proof."
I'm guessing that if WTC7 was a demolition job the explosion probably occurred... inside WTC7? If it went down by fire I guess that fire was concentrated in or around... WTC7? If it went bang after being hit by a zapper ray from space, I guess the shot came from... Mars?
All any of us have is speculation Mutt. And that's a damn shame. That's why I was asking you to provide an expert opinion. But you can't even seem to find the article in question.
_________________
Please sign the petition to prosecute War Criminal Tony Blair | | | | Guest-43f8 | | Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2003 4:22 pm Post subject: |
| | Guest-d256 wrote: | | Guest-43f8 wrote: | | Guest-3efd wrote: | | And how would that controlled demolition have been done? Where would the explosives have been placed? | |
Most of the World Trade Center changed hands in a $3.2 billion, 99-year lease deal that was concluded only seven weeks before the World Trade Center attack; with a sweetheart tax deal and new insurance covering buildings and rents - payable to new beneficiaries.
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey signed the deal with the Silverstein-led Westfield America on the 26th April, 2001. Westfield America leased the concourse mall, and [Larry] Silverstein the office portion.
The deal was finalized and celebrated on the 23rd July - just seven weeks before almost the entire complex was destroyed. Port Authority officers gave a giant set of keys to the complex to Silverstein and to Westfield CEO Lowy.
Silverstein was ecstatic at that time. "This is a dream come true," he had said. "We will be in control of a prized asset, and we will seek to develop its potential, raising it to new heights." An ironic choice of words, in retrospect.
From The World Trade Center Demolition http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wtc.html
Also see http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wot/insurers.htm
Seven weeks total control of the WTC complex by Silverstein and friends is ample time to lace the central core with explosives. |
| Quote: | | Seven weeks total control of the WTC complex by Silverstein and friends is ample time to lace the central core with explosives. |
"lace"? Where? Where in the central core? One explosion? More than one? | | | | False Opposition. | | Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2003 10:45 am Post subject: False Opposition. |
| | False Opposition. | | | | Am I not right? | | Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2003 1:45 am Post subject: Am I not right? |
| | Am I not right? | | | | Complete idiot | | Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2003 9:44 pm Post subject: Re: Am I not right? |
| | Am I not right? wrote: | | Am I not right? |
Course you are - anyone who disagrees with you is either a fool or an idiot, right? | | | | Explosives Everywhere | | Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2003 3:29 am Post subject: Explosives Everywhere |
| | It would have been a normal controlled demolition with small explosives from top to bottom (mainly in the core area). | | | | Truth Seeker | | Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2003 8:32 am Post subject: Re: 2 Anglo |
|
WTC 7 is perhaps the most disturbing of all (strange) events on Sept 11th. This was the first time in history that any steel framed skyscraper suffered complete structural failure purely as a result of fire. This building was not struck by falling debris, that is to say it was not struck by any large objects like falling steel beams. In fact people were using the building after WTC 1 and 2 had fallen. WTC 7 (like all modern sky scrapers) was designed to remain standing during and after a raging inferno.
It is also strange that NYPD's anti terrorism command and control
bunker just so happened to be located in 7 WTC.
To me, this always smacked of foul play. | | | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |
