| Author | Message | | Guest | | Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2003 10:28 pm Post subject: The Zionist Wolf of the White House Pushing US to War |
| Paul Wolfowitz, an Israeli citizen?
Date: 1/19/03 1:58:38 PM Pacific Standard Time
From: BGJDAVID
Note that Paul Wolfowitz has a sister married to an Israeli. I assume they
are living there. Cozy, eh?
I wonder if Wolfowitz has Israeli citizenship. Anyone?
http://www.hoffman-info.com/inferno.html
Last week we were told that it was President Bush who put forth the new,
pivotal National Military Defense Strategy. But Bush's keynote defense
doctrine was lifted almost verbatim from a 1992 directive by Paul Wolfowitz
The Wolf of the White House
by Michael A. Hoffman II
The New York Times Magazine has confirmed what many have suspected, that
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is a figurehead and that the man actually
responsible for setting America's military policy is the "Israel-centric"
Paul Wolfowitz, the fanatical Zionist, architect of the bombing of civilians
in Afghanistan, and the main administration advocate of war on Iraq. In the
waning days of the Ford administration, the C.I.A. director at that time,
George Bush Sr., appointed Wolfowitz to serve on an intelligence panel
(Wolfowitz first infiltrated the Federal government under Nixon):
"Student deferments kept him out of the military draft during the Vietnam
War...In the first days after Sept. 11, when Secretary of State Powell and
others within the administration contended it was too early to put Iraq on
the agenda -- that there was a war to win in Afghanistan first and that
there was no evidence Iraq was complicit in the attacks on the Pentagon and
the twin towers -- Wolfowitz argued that Iraq was at the heart of the
threat...
"...leaving aside the offensive suggestion of dual loyalty...you hear from
some of Wolfowitz's critics, always off the record...that Israel exercises a
powerful gravitational pull on the man...as a teenager he spent his father's
sabbatical semester in Israel...his sister is married to an Israeli...he is
friendly with Israel's generals and diplomats...he is something of a hero to
the heavily Jewish neoconservative movement...
"Charles Fairbanks... a Johns Hopkins political scientist who has known
Wolfowitz since college...(and) who...worked for Wolfowitz in the
policy-planning office of the State Department, recalls him as...ardent on
the subject of certain regimes he regarded as outside the norms of civilized
behavior, including the radical Baath party of Iraq and Muammar el-Qaddafi's
Libya. 'I once presented talking points on Libya, which I considered very
tough. He said: 'You don't understand. I really want to destroy Qaddafi, not
just constrain him." (End quote from the NY Times magazine).
Wolfowitz is an ally of Israeli war criminals and Likud party leaders Ariel
Sharon and Binyamin Netanyahu, both of whom subscribe to the Zionist
"Masada" complex, the mystical suicide course charted by racist "settler"
rabbis who place seizure of the whole of Palestine on the highest level of
priority, above all other geo-political considerations. This crazed policy
orientation would destroy the Israeli state were it not for unlimited
American taxpayer subsidies in the form of arms and cash.
When this Masada complex becomes prevalent within the host state itself--the
U.S.--then the same deterioration of the Israeli economy and government is
bound to occur in America, because no state can govern on the basis of
mystical suicide without imploding under the weight of its own violence,
corruption and irrationality. In a sense, Wolfowitz and his numerous
co-conspirators, such as the equally rabid Richard Perle, are the
gravediggers of not only the Zionist entity but of the U.S. itself. After a
brief spasm of planetary dominion, the U.S. is beginning to sink inexorably
as the crazed Likud philosophy of mystical rabbinic governance gains a
stranglehold in Washington D.C.
The rule of thumb is as follows: Judaism and Zionism = delusion. The more
American officials are influenced by Judaism and Zionism, or actually are
agents of Judaism and Zionism, the more delusional they will become. Any
healthy criticism of this process will be treated as "offensive" to the
sensibilities of the Holy People and therefore career-destroying and
virtually illegal (a form of terrorism).
Last week we were told that it was President Bush who put forth the new,
pivotal National Military Defense Strategy. However, as revealed in the
Sept. 22, 2002 "New York Times Magazine," George W. Bush's keynote defense
doctrine was lifted almost verbatim from a 1992 directive by Wolfowitz:
"...the new worldview evolving in the Bush administration...
interventionist...less sensitive to alliance diplomacy -- is one created
more at the Pentagon than the State Department and one to which Wolfowitz
has brought intellectual weight.... This Defense Department tends to define
leadership as... including a willingness to act unilaterally if need be and
to employ muscle. Rumsfeld and Cheney, who have been friends since the Nixon
administration, are visceral advocates of this more assertive view, but
Wolfowitz is its theorist -- its Kissinger, as one admirer put it.
"In 1992, in what would turn out to be the last year of the first Bush
administration, Wolfowitz, then under-secretary for policy in Cheney's
Defense Department, presided over the writing of a new 'Defense Planning
Guidance,' a broad directive to military leaders on what to prepare for. An
early draft proposed that with the demise of the Soviet Union the United
States doctrine should be to assure that no new superpower arose to rival
America's benign domination of the globe. The U.S. would defend its unique
status both by being militarily powerful beyond challenge and by being such
a constructive force that no one would want to challenge us. We would
participate in coalitions, but they would be 'ad hoc.'
"The U.S. would be 'postured to act independently when collective action
cannot be orchestrated.' The guidance envisioned pre-emptive attacks against
states bent on acquiring nuclear, biological or chemical weapons. It was
accompanied by illustrative scenarios of hypothetical wars for which the
military should be prepared. One of them was another war against Iraq, where
Saddam had already rebounded from his gulf-war defeat and was busily
crushing domestic unrest...That now seems to have become the Bush
doctrine..." End quote from "The Sunshine Warrior" by Bill Keller, NY Times
Magazine, Sept. 22, 2002. | |  | | Alpha | | | | Alpha | | | | Alpha | | | | Guest | | | | Alpha | | | | Alpha | | | | Alpha | | | | Alpha | | | | Alpha | | | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |
