| Author | Message | | Top | | Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2003 7:53 am Post subject: |
| | Anonymous wrote: | | how lame. as if simply reposting the same inaccurate information will make any difference. grow up why don't you. | Reposting aside, the information is spot on. | |  | | Guest | | Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2003 9:55 am Post subject: |
| | Top wrote: | | Anonymous wrote: | | how lame. as if simply reposting the same inaccurate information will make any difference. grow up why don't you. | Reposting aside, the information is spot on. | Zionist distraction and truth distortion tactic... The information is right on as Israel is out of control... | |  | | Guest | | Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2003 9:57 am Post subject: Why Al Gore Didn't Run for President Again |
| http://www.creators.com/opinion_show.cfm?columnsName=aco All newspaper editors want to know what their readers like. If you would like to read this feature in your local newspaper, please do not hesitate to share your enthusiasm with your local newspaper editor. RELEASE: WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 25, 2002 AFTER GORE What an irony! In the opinion of many, it was a Third Party candidate, Ralph Nader of the Greens, who doomed the Democratic candidate in 2000 and ensured victory for George Bush. Just over two years later, that same candidate, Al Gore, all but guaranteed there will be a third party challenger in 2004, maybe even Ralph Nader. On Sunday, Dec. 15 of this waning year, Al Gore announced that he was no longer a candidate for the Democratic nomination in 2004. He'd come to that conclusion, he said, in the green room at NBC's studios in New York, waiting to go on "Saturday Night Live." Liberated from the burden of candidacy, Gore duly put on one of the better performances of his career in public life. So why did he stand down, and what does his exit portend in the political battles ahead? When Gore took his stance against the attack on Iraq he was parting ways with a group that has underwritten his political career these past 30 years, a group among whose prime features has been unswerving advocacy of the most hawkish Israeli positions, as expressed by Gore's tutor, Martin Peretz, Harvard fixture and sometime editor-in-chief of the New Republic. It was Peretz who stood at Gore's elbow when the latter successfully established himself as one of the most delirious pro-Israel apologists in the U.S. Congress. It was Peretz who helped script Gore's prime-time Senate speech in 1991 announcing his defection from the Congressional Democrats in favor of Bush Sr.'s war. Gore had to have known, when he started voicing opposition to Bush Jr.'s war plans, that his most enduring money source would dry up, that he was cutting off his own money supply. Is the moral that no Democratic candidate can afford to take any position athwart that of Israel's hawks and their promoters here? It certainly looks like it. Most prominent in the field as possible Democratic challengers to George Bush we now have Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts, Senator Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut and Senator John Edwards of North Carolina. Back in 1991, Kerry, a Vietnam vet, spoke strongly against war on Iraq, and in 2000, Gore discounted Kerry as a possible running mate because of that opposition. Now, Kerry favors war. Lieberman takes his cue from Ariel Sharon. Kerry has the financial advantage of being married to Teresa, formerly the wife of Senator John Heinz, who was killed in an air crash. Teresa inherited around $700 million. For his part, Lieberman rakes in cash from the corporations in whose cause he led the push to relax the accounting rules, thus prompting the corporate scandals that made 2002 such an enjoyable year. To winch his nomination prospects out of the mud, Edwards began to pound the war drum last fall. The prospect of dropping bombs on Iraqi people enthralls the senator. On Sept. 19, Edwards rushed to be first in line among Senate Democrats to show his unflinching support for unlimited war, publishing an editorial in the Washington Post so in tune with Bush doctrine that the U.S. State Department featured it on its Web site. Moral: As with Kerry, no Democratic candidate feels able to oppose a war on Iraq. The same time that Gore was staking his antiwar ground, the Texan populist Ronnie Dugger wrote an impassioned article in The Nation magazine, entitled "Ralph, Don't Run," calling for unified opposition to Bush in 2004. Bush, Dugger wrote, is far worse than anyone could have imagined. There is no longer room, he concluded, for any Third Party candidate liable to take votes from the Democratic nominee. Dugger recounted how he had vainly tried to get Ralph Nader to agree that all progressives, populists, Leftists, Greens, etc., should fall in behind the Democratic nominee. "Ralph persists in the view," Dugger wrote sadly, "that it does not matter whether a Democrat or a Republican sits in the White House." Gore's departure hasn't made life any easier for those who would agree with Dugger. After all, here's was a Democratic politician building a campaign platform exactly along the sort of left-liberal lines Dugger has long campaigned for. Gore had come out in favor of single-payer health insurance. He'd been taking a populist line on the economy. He'd attacked the looming war. At which point he discovered that he had no future in the party as a presidential candidate and no prospect of raising any money. There were three major issues in 2002: war with Iraq; national security and the bill of rights; and the tanking economy. The Democrats have failed on all three fronts, nowhere more dismally than on the economy, where opportunity has been ripest. The Democrats have no plan, and much of the time manage to stand to the right of the Republicans on matters such as balancing the budget. Amid almost weekly examples of corporate looting and executive criminality unrivaled in the fragrant history of American capitalism, the Democrats have been unable to seize the initiative, which is scarcely surprising since the party has been soundly bribed into complaisance by these same corporate criminals. When Gore took himself out of the race on Dec. 15, he proved once again Ralph Nader's point: the seamless realities of mainstream politics; the enduring need for alternative candidacies. It may not be Nader himself, but in all likelihood, there will be another Green candidate, and for those furious Democrats who think it was Nader who gave Bush the crucial edge in his dubious capture of the White House, that's grim news. Alexander Cockburn is coeditor with Jeffrey St. Clair of the muckraking newsletter CounterPunch. To find out more about Alexander Cockburn and read features by other columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com. COPYRIGHT 2002 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC. Originally Published | |  | | Guest | | Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2003 10:09 am Post subject: 'DON'T DIE FOR ISRAEL' |
| > A Review by Dr. Susan Huck of "ONE NATION UNDER ISRAEL," by Andrew > Hurley > > Editor comments: Thank you Dr. Susan Huck. > > The following powerful one-page review of ONE NATION UNDER ISRAEL by > career journalist and book author Dr. Susan Huck is the most incisive > review yet. It again reminds your Editor that this book was Andrew > Hurley's life literary work, resulting from 20 years of careful data > collection and writing. > > Hurley chose, because of the nature of his business relationships, to > wait until his retirement to publish ONE NATION UNDER ISRAEL. Each > paragraph and every word was mulled over time and time again before > it was finally printed. Only the clearest facts and conclusions > survived. The result was this impeccable book. > > It was my honor to know Jim Hurley before his death last year, and to > hear of the many antidotes he did not include, and some he could not > include. Andrew J. Hurley (Jim) lived an abundant and adventurous > life that would seem enviable to most of us. However It is my belief > that he will someday be remembered, not for his business successes, > but for this, his one and only book. > > ONE NATION UNDER ISRAEL is the one book we know of that has yet to be > seriously challenged on any material fact, and nary a detail has been > upended since WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS published it as our first book. > Hurley wrote ONUI believing that millions of live were at risk, and > that he could make a difference. > > Thanks to Jim Hurley; we will do our best to help the world remember > and honor him - Editor. > > DON'T DIE FOR ISRAEL > > A Review by Dr. Susan Huck of ONE NATION UNDER ISRAEL, by Andrew > Hurley > > The original title of this 1990 book, "Holocaust II? Saving > Israel from Suicide", perhaps more accurately reflected the author's > concern that aggressive Israeli policies might ultimately lead to > disaster for Israel. However, the current title very accurately > reflects the current American, as distinct from the Israeli problem. > It details, as truthfully as any source I have seen, the manner in > which Uncle Sam is converted into Uncle Schlemiel, Israel's 900-pound > gorilla. > > The theme of suicidal Jewish zealotry is outlined in Hurley's > first chapter, which draws upon A History of the Jews, by Dr. Abram > Sachar, once president of Brandeis University. Far from the tale of > continual undeserved victimhood constantly served to the public, > Sachar demonstrates how, from a thousand years before the birth of > Christ, Jewish tribes and states kept getting into needless > difficulties with both friend and foe. > > Ah, but such a perspective does not serve current > purposes. "We" non-Jews must be kept guilt-ridden and "obliged" to > grovel, pay, and otherwise sacrifice ourselves for Jews. An Anti- > Defamation League catalogue of "educational" material emphasizes the > theme of victimhood and martyrdom at the hands of Christians, as in > The Longest Hatred -- "from the Cross to the Swastika." The ADL's > concept of a "good Christian" is one who sacrifices himself for the > Jews. It is sad to see the American armed forces being set up to > serve as "good Christians" for Israel. > > Hurley's book was originally published in 1990, before "Gulf > War I," the Bush 41 war. The re-titled but not revised edition was > published in 1999, apparently missing by just a few years "Gulf War > II," or the Bush 43 war scheduled for 2003. Nothing, it seems, will > deter President George Bush from initiating the all-out war on Iraq > being pressed by a Jewish cabal within his administration. Jewish > enthusiasts look forward to it as the beginning of "World War IV" to > forcibly "re-educate" all Moslems everywhere, beginning with Israel's > closest foes. > > As the preface to ONE NATION UNDER ISRAEL explains, lawyer > and historian Andrew Hurley does much more than examine Jewish > history. He explains -- at length and with "documentation," the > methods by which the Jewish lobby in the United States controls "our" > federal government. The carrot is money, the stick is public > smearing, followed if necessary by deprivation of livelihood. > > American and Israeli Jews collaborate seamlessly to bulldoze > Congress and the entire executive branch into sending an > uninterrupted stream of money, military hardware, and whatever else > is wanted to Israel. Congressman Larry McDonald, who was on the > research and development subcommittee of the House Armed Services > Committee, once told me that "we wouldn't even have an R & D program > if Israel didn't want us to," because the fruits of taxpayer-funded R > & D, he knew, were funneled straight to Israel. > > The Israelis then feel free to market it, by the way. Hurley > explains this in great detail. No cabinet member, not to mention mere > bureaucrat, can stand in the way of this continual transfer of > wealth, because the Jews can "go over the head" of anyone of any > rank. > > Hurley, writing in 1990, could not have known that George > Bush's father, Bush 41, would "learn" that he lost his 1992 re- > election campaign because he merely delayed a "loan guarantee" to > Israel. (That is, he delayed guaranteeing that if Israel > defaulted, "our" government would pay. In any event, our annual multi- > billion dollar gifts to Israel easily cover Israel's debts.) Young > Bush 43 has been keenly monitored ever since he loomed on the horizon > as a candidate. The ADL boasts of this. > > In short, Hurley's book is a manual of "how they do it," > filled with examples as of 1990. In 2003, "how they do it" has simply > become more blatant, as Jewish "neocons" -- so-called neo- > conservatives -- pack the administration with armchair warhawks and > are apparently capable of employing the American armed forces as > their own. > > By employing mere name-calling as a first-line weapon, the > goyim are reduced to jellyfish. Why does anyone respond to > accusations of "anti-Semitism" with other than a patient smile and > the comment, "That won't work, either"? > > If the silly goyim ever wake up and do that, the United > States might cease to be ONE NATION UNDER ISRAEL. -end > > (Reviewer, Dr. Susan Huck's latest book "WHY DO WE AMERICAN SUBMIT TO > THIS" By Newcomb Publisher's Inc., is now available from We Hold > These Truths, $20.00) > > To Buy ONE NATION UNDER ISRAEL, 345 page soft cover, $17.50; 2 for > $35.00; 10 for $128.00. (http://www.whtt.org/bookstor.htm) > > We Hold These Truths > P.O. Box 14491 > Scottsdale, AZ 85254 > 480-947-3329 > > To subscribe, type "Subscribe" in the SUBJECT LINE. > To unsubscribe, type "Remove" in the SUBJECT LINE. > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ WORDS are Stronger than SWORDS! ~ Spread the words to the Wilderness! ++++++++++++++++++++++ eFreePalestine ++++++++++++++++++++++ eFreePalestine is America's Secular WILDERNESS VOICE for PALESTINE!* www.FreePalestine.com No Peace Without Occupation Free PALESTINE! ++++++++++++++++++++++ eFreePalestine ++++++++++++++++++++++ Blessed are the Peacemakers NOT the Warmongers! Chronic INJUSTICE is the ROOT of TERRORISM! Fighting TERRORISM while AIDING OCCUPATION is Moronic! END TERRORISM by ENDING Israeli OCCUPATION Stupid! SHARON NOW = MILOSEVIC Then = HITLER IN 1942! Peace Only in a Legislatively DEzIONIZED Secular State! Aiding Israeli OCCUPATION = Aiding TERRORISM! Where Does Our Simplistic Absolutist President Stand?! ++++++++++++++++++++++ eFreePalestine ++++++++++++++++++++++ www.Badil.org The RIGHT of RETURN! www.IndictSharon.net Indict the BUTCHER! www.PMWatch.org PALESTINE MEDIA WATCH! www.PalestineRemembered.com PALESTINE for DUMMIES! www.FreePalestineCampaign.org Be a Peacemaker in PALESTINE! www.InternationalAnswer.org Act Now to STOP WAR and End RACISM www.capwiz.com/ADC/home/ Tell Congress to Stop Aid to Israel! www.Al-Awda.org/petition.htm END zIONIST Profit from OCCUPATION! www.RamallahOnline.com Our Occupied Home in Ramallah PALESTINE! www.groups.Yahoo.com/group/eFreePalestine/messages ARCHIVES! www.PalestineChronicle.com News and Views from PALESTINE! www.DocumentaryPhotographs.com Pictures from PALESTINE! www.PalestineMonitor.org Monitor PALESTINE! www.WRMEA.com zIONIST-Free MEDIA! ++++++++++++++++++++++ eFreePalestine ++++++++++++++++++++++ eFreePalestine-subscribe@YahooGroups.com SUBSCRIBE NOW eFreePalestine-unsubscribe@YahooGroups.com Unsubscribe eFreePalestine@YahooGroups.com Speak up on eFreePalestine! eFreePalestine-owner@YahooGroups.com Questions/Comments! Views expressed are the author's only* ++++++++++++++++++++++ eFreePalestine ++++++++++++++++++++++ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms | |  | | Guest | | Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2003 12:46 pm Post subject: |
| | Anonymous wrote: | | how lame. as if simply reposting the same inaccurate information will make any difference. grow up why don't you. | It's the old theory that if you tell a lie enough times, some fool will eventually believe it. But I do have to admit that the poster that keeps posting links to his own articles seems to be a bit of a twit. | |  | | Guest | | Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2003 12:58 pm Post subject: |
| | Anonymous wrote: | | Anonymous wrote: | | how lame. as if simply reposting the same inaccurate information will make any difference. grow up why don't you. | It's the old theory that if you tell a lie enough times, some fool will eventually believe it. But I do have to admit that the poster that keeps posting links to his own articles seems to be a bit of a twit. | You can cage the singer but not the song. | |  | | bopsterd | | Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2003 5:01 am Post subject: SHAKING ISRAEL |
| | Question: Did Ariel Sharon advise George Bush to use the same policies on the American people that Israel uses on the Palestinians and on Israeli citizies, i.e. deportations, no due process, mandatory conscription? Does that explain the Patriot Act? | |  | | Guest-43e1 | | Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2003 7:32 am Post subject: See |
| Who let that sleazy cocksucker Crazy Howie and his "The Wonder Years" cheapo-putzo little buds back on?!! Jew purses opened wide, and now we've got an entire quisling Congress. They got the shekels, and Findlay gives a few heckles. The 'Net is spreading the Word, and that's good. But, each of us, must tell it to another American in the course of their daily strolls. Democracy has been bought by Jews for Jews, and we gots to change that ugliness around. | |  | | ALexander James | | Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2003 4:41 pm Post subject: ISRAELI/ZIONIST CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY/CRUEL OCCUPATION OF |
| Zionists' motto is "Make War by Deception". Zionists will lie, kill, torture, steal, cheat anyone. They have been doing it since centuries with their Freemason Brotherhood allies. Once they commit genocide on the Palestinians, they will continue with genocide on the rest of the world. They are having Palestinians for breakfast but the lunch and supper is the rest of the world. Don't be fooled by what Zionists say! Zionists are real snakes and lizards! Zionists even collaborated with Nazis to kill ordinary Jews and non-Jews. Zionists collaborated with Stalin as well. Zionists are a menace to manking. They control Israel and the United States in all significant power areas. It is only by exposing them that the rest of the world will be able to survive. | |  | | Alpha | | Posted: Tue May 11, 2004 6:48 am Post subject: THE WISE COURSE: WITHDRAW FROM IRAQ |
| THE WISE COURSE: WITHDRAW FROM IRAQ By Paul Findley / May 6, 2004 Misguided by the arrogance of military power and a dangerous vision of imperial destiny, President George W. Bush and a compliant Congress have led America into a bloody abyss that gets deeper and bloodier with each passing day. Their dreams of a flower-strewn path of Iraqi liberation have become a nightmare. U.S. forces are mired in a lethal struggle against powerful, resourceful insurgents. It is war, not liberation. Casualties blight many thousands of families on both sides, with no end in sight. Iraqi hostility to the U.S. occupation soars and so does anti-American fury worldwide. Photographs of barbaric U.S. torture and abuse of incarcerated Iraqis will long burn in the memories of many millions. Never before has America been viewed in such wretched ugliness. President Bush’s response to this plight is more troops, preferably from other countries. It will only deepen the misery. We learned in Vietnam that more foreign military firepower will increase insurgency, not quell it. Bush misreads the militancy as the work of remnants of the Saddam regime and newly arrived troublemakers from Al Queda. It fact, it is motivated mainly by broad Iraqi fear that the United States plans to control Iraq far into the future. Here are questions that trouble Iraqis: -- Why has Washington established a super-embassy in Iraq with a staff of 3,000, the largest diplomatic mission in world history? Is it designed to influence future Iraqi governmental activity? -- How long will U.S. troops remain in Iraq? Will U.S. military bases there ever be dismantled? -- When will reconstruction work be turned over to Iraqi contractors and employees? -- How can Iraqis believe Bush’s promise of independence and freedom while he helps Israel deny these same rights in neighboring Palestine? Israel has long manipulated U.S. policy in the Middle East and already advises U.S. forces on how to organize the occupation. Consequently, Iraqis fear Israel will be the real power in fashioning U.S. policy in Iraq during the interim period that starts July l and will remain dominant even after Iraqi citizens directly elect a government. A recent major survey by CNN-USA Today reports that Iraqis fear becoming “another Palestine.” The remedy to this dreadful mess is a clear U.S. decision, announced immediately, to exit Iraq. President Bush must face down Israeli opposition and announce that, within weeks after the inauguration of the new directly-elected government, probably in early January, a full U.S. withdrawal will occur. His announcement must state that all U.S. military forces and any abnormal U.S. diplomatic bureaucracy will depart, except for those the new Iraqi government may ask to remain. Beyond any such exceptions, all U.S. military bases will be dismantled, all U.S. construction and maintenance contracts will be terminated, and all future U.S. aid to Iraq will handled through the U.S. Agency for International Development. If Bush acts, his announcement will be applauded except by the Israeli government. In America, all citizens will know that the costly mess in Iraq will soon end. In Iraq, with the U.S. exit assured, insurgency will surely diminish and casualties may even end. Attention will shift to approving a constitution and electing a truly independent Iraqi government. Worldwide anti-American passion will subside, because the announcement will be read as a significant departure, not just from Iraq, but from the war-making doctrines announced by the Bush administration after the 9/11 catastrophe. It will also signal the end of Bush’s dreams of empire in the Middle East and be a significant expression of America’s. confidence is the ability of the Iraqis to manage their own affairs. When the U.S. exit is completed, Americans and Iraqis alike will be able to give full attention to mending the awful wounds of an awful war. ----------- Paul Findley, a Republican Member of Congress 1961-83, is the author of three books and hundreds of articles on the Arab-Israeli conflict. He founded the Washington-based Council for the National Interest, and resides in Jacksonville, Illinois. [See also Findley's essay, "Liberating America from Israel": http://www.ihr.org/leaflets/liberatingamerica.shtml] | |  | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |