| Author | Message | | Guest | | Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2002 7:39 am Post subject: |
| | Anonymous wrote: | | Quote: | Israel Attack On USS Liberty
'No Accident' Says Helms
By Bryant Jordan Staff Writer
Marine Corps Times
From Navy Times
7-7-2 |
Strange is it not, but a check of the paper's web site show there's no such Navy Times, nor Marine Corps Times article by that title. Nor is there anything dated "7-7-2" (whatever that's suppose to represent.)
Yet not strange is that certain stated opinions are just that, and aren't supposed by anything. No wonder there's been no reaction to the stories -- no matter how many times they get repeated in this forum. |
So this Zionist truth distorter now is trying to deny that there was an article in the Navy Times (which also appeared in the Marine Times) this past Summer... Incredible... Anyone interested further can contact the publisher to confirm that there was such an article... These Zionist truth distorters are a piece of work.... Can't attack the message (especially what Capt Ward Boston has conveyed), so try to attack the "messenger" (which in this case is the Navy Times article which can be accessed via http://www.navytimes.com if you are a subscriber there). | |  | | Sailor Bob | | Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2002 9:05 am Post subject: Dumb as a post |
| | Anonymous wrote: | | Anonymous wrote: | | Quote: | Israel Attack On USS Liberty
'No Accident' Says Helms
By Bryant Jordan Staff Writer
Marine Corps Times
From Navy Times
7-7-2 |
Strange is it not, but a check of the paper's web site show there's no such Navy Times, nor Marine Corps Times article by that title. Nor is there anything dated "7-7-2" (whatever that's suppose to represent.)
Yet not strange is that certain stated opinions are just that, and aren't supposed by anything. No wonder there's been no reaction to the stories -- no matter how many times they get repeated in this forum. |
So this Zionist truth distorter now is trying to deny that there was an article in the Navy Times (which also appeared in the Marine Times) this past Summer... Incredible... Anyone interested further can contact the publisher to confirm that there was such an article... This Zionist truth distorters are a piece of work.... Can't attack the message (especially what Capt Ward Boston has conveyed), so try to attack the "messenger" (which in this case is the Navy Times article which can be accessed via http://www.navytimes.com if you are a subscriber there). |
Dumb-as-a-post can't read. Yes, go to the Navy Times site (if a subscriber) and attempt to find anything for 7-7-2 and anything whatsoever with a title as posted above -- it can't be done.
It's easy to "attack" Captain Boston in addition to "attacking" whoever was the clown to post on some internet web site what is displayed at the top.
79-year-old Boston is free to express an opinion which simply isn't supported by any facts. He's also free to impugn his own integrity and honor by making any statement he wishes reflecting on his actions from 35 years ago. The record, of not only his own actions, but that of Admirals Kidd, Hearn, McCain, and Moorer in addition to Captains Lauff and Atkinson, don't confirm what it was reported. And it's certainly not supported by Kidd's own words and deeds while still alive.
There's no surprise why the story, as produced, is nothing more then hot air on the internet circuit. | | | | Guest | | Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2002 6:52 pm Post subject: |
| | *Mutt American wrote: | | Interesting how airing the truth about Ritter is "smearing" him. |
It's amazing how airing the truth about GW Bush is "smearing" him, also. | | | | *Mutt American | | Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2002 10:48 pm Post subject: |
| | Try the truth. | | | | Guest | | Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2002 3:34 am Post subject: |
| | *Mutt American wrote: | Ritter was bought and paid for by Arab money. He also got himself fired from the UN inspections, so he is out for revenge.
You'll have to do alot better than Ritter to have any credibility. |
A garden-variety Jew lie. Not even Richard "Estelle" Perle has made this ludicrous claim. She tried to go the route of "Ritter's unstable."
Ritter spoke today at UCLA. Over 20,000 gave him an eleven minute standing ovation. No pathetic jew liars in attendance. | | | | *Mutt American | | Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2002 4:06 am Post subject: |
| Friday, September 13, 2002
DAVID ASMAN, FOX NEWS CHANNEL: President Bush at the U.N. today mapping out Saddam Hussein's violations of U.N. resolutions. Former U.N. weapons inspector Scott Ritter, who at one time warned in similar tones about Saddam Hussein, sounds different now. The question is why.
Scott Ritter joins us here in our studio. Good to have you, sir.
SCOTT RITTER, FORMER U.N. WEAPONS INSPECTOR: Thanks a lot.
ASMAN: Let me read to you a couple of quotes. I'm sure you've heard it before, but these are from four years ago, when you sounded about Saddam Hussein not very much different from the way President Bush did today at the U.N.
This one is from this week -- August 30, 1998 -- "Six months is a very reasonable time scale for Iraq to resume weapons capabilities."
The second two are from Good Morning America also in August of '98.
First, "Iraq's job is to avoid bringing the world's attention to the fact they've retained these weapons," and then, "Iraq retains the capability to launch a chemical strike." Sounds like Saddam Hussein is very dangerous and could mount a chemical strike right now.
RITTER: And what point are you trying to make?
ASMAN: Do you disagree with that in any way, shape or form?
RITTER: I don't disagree with anything I've ever said. Why in God's name would I disagree with something I've said? | | | | *Mutt American | | Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2002 4:20 am Post subject: |
| | By his own admission, Ritter accepted $400,000 in funding two years ago from an Iraqi-American businessman named Shakir al-Khafaji. Ritter used the money to visit Baghdad and film a documentary purporting to tell the true story of the weapons inspections (which in his telling were corrupted by sinister American manipulation). As Hayes has reported, al-Khafaji is openly sympathetic to Saddam and regularly sponsors anti-American conferences in Baghdad. Al-Khafaji seems to have gotten his money's worth: The documentary was so anti-U.S., says one of Ritter's former U.N. colleagues, that Iraqi officials were passing out copies of it on CD-ROM at a recent international conference. | | | | *Mutt American | | Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2002 4:21 am Post subject: |
| A hulking figure at 6 feet 4 inches and 200-plus pounds, Ritter was known for shouting down Iraqi officials during tense standoffs outside suspected weapons sites. When he concluded in 1998 that neither the United States nor the United Nations had the stomach for disarming Iraq and resigned in disgust, he was a regular on television and at Capitol Hill hearings, urgently warning of the horrors that would reward the world's wimpiness. Iraq is "not nearly disarmed," he wrote in a 1998 New Republic article, asserting that Saddam likely retained everything from nerve gas to anthrax, as well as his "entire nuclear weapons infrastructure." Iraq could completely resurrect its weapons of mass destruction programs "within a period of six months," he told a Senate committee that year. As for Saddam, Ritter said he "remains an ugly threat to his neighbors and to world peace."
Today Ritter sings a suspiciously different tune. He now contends that Iraq was "fundamentally disarmed" in the 1990s. It turns out that when U.N. inspections ended in 1998, Saddam "did not have the capability to reconstitute" his death machine. Ritter now assures us that "Iraq is a threat to no one." | | | | Guest | | Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2002 7:19 am Post subject: |
| | Only the brain-dead would think Ritter, in 2002, has a clue. | | | | Guest | | | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |
