War Without End Forum Index

War Without End

The global war against terror, news about the illegal invasion of Iraq, the corporate puppet presidents, the war criminal Tony Blair, September 11th 2001, the USS Liberty and New World Order crimes against humanity.

Scott Ritter's Excellent CALTECH Speech on Nov. 13th, 2002 - page 2

War Without End Forum Index -> Middle East and Asia
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
Lekh teda
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2002 9:49 pm    Post subject:

It's unfortunate that some people like Xdangerousdna feel that it's only the truth if it agrees with their point of view. If a Jew said the Earth was round, they would say that is a Zionist lie and the Earth is flat. It's no surprise that most of her cut and paste drivel is from Arab based sources. And we know that they are never biased Laughing
*Mutt American
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2002 9:53 pm    Post subject:

Anonymous wrote:
*Mutt American wrote:
Interesting how airing the truth about Ritter is "smearing" him.


Of course the Zionist Jew ("Mutt American") is against what Ritter is saying because Zionist Jews like "Mutt American" want an invasion of Iraq so Sharon can get underway with his "transfer" (ethnic cleansing) of Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza to Jordan...


I don't want an invasion of Iraq. I want the Iraqis to get rid of Saddam. One bullet. $.25

I'll chip in the quarter.

But if they won't do it, then we'll have to.
Guest
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2002 11:07 pm    Post subject:

Quote:
I don't want an invasion of Iraq. I want the Iraqis to get rid of Saddam. One bullet. $.25

I'll chip in the quarter.

But if they won't do it, then we'll have to.


You want more than just ridding Iraq of Saddam - you want complete control and it's going to cost you a lot, lot more than a mere $25. I wonder how many body bags you think it's worth?
Guest
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2002 11:10 pm    Post subject:

*Mutt American wrote:
Interesting how airing the truth about Ritter is "smearing" him.


Whenever the press quits abusing me, I know I'm in the wrong pew.
Harry S. Truman
Guest
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2002 11:15 pm    Post subject:

Anonymous wrote:
Quote:
I don't want an invasion of Iraq. I want the Iraqis to get rid of Saddam. One bullet. $.25

I'll chip in the quarter.

But if they won't do it, then we'll have to.


You want more than just ridding Iraq of Saddam - you want complete control and it's going to cost you a lot, lot more than a mere $25. I wonder how many body bags you think it's worth?


Your propoganda only works on your buddies. Paying markey price for oil is alot cheaper than any invasion and following support of Iraq. OPEC doesn't have control anymore. Why would we want the problems related to an invasion of Iraq when OPEC is losing control and the oil market has gone low enough that even Saudi Arabia has major debt?

Think terrorism. Think UBL. Think 9/11. We're going to change that. Distortion of facts and politically correct type of thinking isn't going to change that.
Guest
Posted: Fri Dec 13, 2002 1:27 am    Post subject: Why Terrorist Attacks are NOT Inevitable (Cut Aid to Israel)

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Quote:
I don't want an invasion of Iraq. I want the Iraqis to get rid of Saddam. One bullet. $.25

I'll chip in the quarter.

But if they won't do it, then we'll have to.


You want more than just ridding Iraq of Saddam - you want complete control and it's going to cost you a lot, lot more than a mere $25. I wonder how many body bags you think it's worth?


Your propoganda only works on your buddies. Paying markey price for oil is alot cheaper than any invasion and following support of Iraq. OPEC doesn't have control anymore. Why would we want the problems related to an invasion of Iraq when OPEC is losing control and the oil market has gone low enough that even Saudi Arabia has major debt?

Think terrorism. Think UBL. Think 9/11. We're going to change that. Distortion of facts and politically correct type of thinking isn't going to change that.


Why Terrorist Attacks are NOT Inevitable

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2002/11/26/why-terrorist-attacks-are-not-inevitable.php
Guest
Posted: Fri Dec 13, 2002 1:32 am    Post subject:

Lekh teda wrote:
It's unfortunate that some people like Xdangerousdna feel that it's only the truth if it agrees with their point of view. If a Jew said the Earth was round, they would say that is a Zionist lie and the Earth is flat. It's no surprise that most of her cut and paste drivel is from Arab based sources. And we know that they are never biased Laughing


Xdangerousdna is not an Arab and neither am I.. But you appear to be a JEW from Haifa... Considering how Israel has lied by calling the intentional and brutal attack on the USS Liberty a "mistake", no Israeli can be trusted:

http://www.ussliberty.org

CNN: Israel's 1967 attack on U.S. Liberty deliberate


http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2002/11/24/cnn-israel-s-1967-attack-on-u-s-liberty-deliberate.php
*Mutt American
Posted: Fri Dec 13, 2002 1:41 am    Post subject:

Let's say just for the sake of arguement that the attack on the Liberty was intentional.

So were British attacks on the US starting in 1776 and in 1812.

Your buddies the Germans attacked Britain and the rest of Europe intentionally, and now it is easier for a German to get into another EU country than an American.

Italy was Germany's ally, right? (at least for a while). They are with you in the EU too, right?
Guest
Posted: Fri Dec 13, 2002 1:59 am    Post subject:

Xdangerousdna is not an Arab and neither am I.. But you appear to be a JEW from Haifa... Considering how Israel has lied by calling the intentional and brutal attack on the USS Liberty a "mistake", no Israeli can be trusted:

//////////////////////////

Interesting claim by a bigot who can't prove xdangerous isn't an Arab ...

Too bad for your opinion it's not only the Israelis (or JEWS in your lingo) who understand the 1967 attack was indeed a mistake.

CNN: Israel's 1967 attack on U.S. Liberty deliberate

///////////////////////

Nope, CNN was only reporting on the [discredited] claims from the Bamford book.

http://world.std.com/~camera/docs/alert/bamford.html
Guest
Posted: Fri Dec 13, 2002 2:05 am    Post subject:

*Mutt American wrote:
Let's say just for the sake of arguement that the attack on the Liberty was intentional.

So were British attacks on the US starting in 1776 and in 1812.

Your buddies the Germans attacked Britain and the rest of Europe intentionally, and now it is easier for a German to get into another EU country than an American.

Italy was Germany's ally, right? (at least for a while). They are with you in the EU too, right?


Heck, just mention the Israeli attack on the HMS Crane in Nov. 1956, or the Iraqi attack on the USS Stark in May 1987.

No one apparently wants to acknowledge the Egyptian attack on the US oil company plane in Dec. 1964, which killed the flight crew.

Why is that do you suppose?
 

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

War Without End Forum Index -> Middle East and Asia
All times are GMT
©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk
Bookmark and Share
Social Links:  Homeowner Association Software  Appliances Reno NV  America Hijacked  Cash System X Review  300 Internet Marketers