| Author | Message | | Guest | | Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2002 9:42 pm Post subject: FULL TEXT OF ZIONIST JINSA WAR HAWK RICHARD PERLE |
| James, please find below full text of the story on Perle... his words are
very interesting.
EXCLUSIVE
By Paul Gilfeather, Whitehall Editor
GEORGE W. Bush's top security adviser admitted last night the US would
blitz Iraq - even if no weapons were found by UN inspectors.
Dr Richard Perle stunned MPs at Westminster by insisting that even a "clean
bill of health" from UN chief weapons inspector Hans Blix could not halt
President Bush's war machine.
And he declared that evidence from just ONE witness claiming to have seen
Saddam Hussein's weapons programme was enough to trigger a fresh military
onslaught.
Last night furious Labour MPs lined up to blast Washington as the news cast
another dark cloud over the tense process.
Former defence minister and Labour backbencher, Peter Kilfoyle, told the
Daily Mirror: "What we have heard from Dr Perle is absolutely astonishing.
"America is duping the world into believing that it supports these
inspections. President Bush intends to go to war even if the inspectors
find nothing.
"This make a mockery of the whole process and exposes America's real
determination to bomb Iraq no matter what the outcome of these inspections
are."
Right-winger Perle dropped his bombshell during an all-party meeting of MPs
on global security.
The Pentagon adviser made clear the White House's total contempt for the
inspection process, which got underway on Monday.
The global community held its breath as inspectors landed in Baghdad,
believing that the results of the search could end in peace.
But last night Dr Perle made clear that nothing the 74-year-old Swede
reports would be enough to satisfy America's lust for war.
Dr Perle said: "I would not say that I don't believe what Hans Blix says.
"But I cannot see how Hans Blix can state more than he can know.
"All he can know is the results of his own investigations. And that does
not prove Saddam does not have weapons of mass destruction."
Tory backbencher Peter Tapsell sought clarification, adding: "If no weapons
of mass destruction are found, what does Dr Perle think the actions of the
United States will be?"
The chairman of America's Defence Policy Board responded: "The
circumstances in which the weapons are not found matters.
"If Hans Blix issues his full authority and is able to invite Iraqis to
safety and they say there are programmes, we will have to take that very
seriously."
Dr Perle repeated that evidence from Iraqis could be enough evidence to
trigger a full-scale attack on Iraq.
"Suppose we are able to find someone who has been involved in the
development of weapons and he says there are stores of nerve agents?," he
added.
"But you cannot find them because they are so well hidden. Do you actually
have to take possession of the nerve agents to convince?
"We are not dealing with a situation where you can expect co-operation."
Mr Kilfoyle said last night that MPs would be horrified to learn that the
"say-so" of an Iraqi witness would be enough to overshadow the inspectors'
work.
He added: "Because Saddam is so hated in Iraq it would be easy to find
someone to say they witnessed weapons building.
"Perle says the American's would be satisfied with such claims even if no
real evidence was produced. That's a terrifying prospect."
ends | |  | | Guest | | | | Guest | | | | Guest | | | | Guest | | | | Guest | | Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2002 9:18 am Post subject: |
| The Spam Sketch from the second series of "Monty Python's Flying Circus" and
"Monty Python's Previous Record"
(Spam = Spiced Pork And Ham, a sort of cheap luncheon meat)
Scene: A cafe. One table is occupied by a group of Vikings with horned
helmets on. A man and his wife enter.
Man (Eric Idle): You sit here, dear.
Wife (Graham Chapman in drag): All right.
Man (to Waitress): Morning!
Waitress (Terry Jones, in drag as a bit of a rat-bag): Morning!
Man: Well, what've you got?
Waitress: Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam;
egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam; spam bacon sausage
and spam; spam egg spam spam bacon and spam; spam sausage spam spam
bacon spam tomato and spam;
Vikings (starting to chant): Spam spam spam spam...
Waitress: ...spam spam spam egg and spam; spam spam spam spam spam spam baked
beans spam spam spam...
Vikings (singing): Spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam!
Waitress: ...or Lobster Thermidor a Crevette with a mornay sauce served in a
Provencale manner with shallots and aubergines garnished with
truffle pate, brandy and with a fried egg on top and spam.
Wife: Have you got anything without spam?
Waitress: Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in
it.
Wife: I don't want ANY spam!
Man: Why can't she have egg bacon spam and sausage?
Wife: THAT'S got spam in it!
Man: Hasn't got as much spam in it as spam egg sausage and spam, has it?
Vikings: Spam spam spam spam (crescendo through next few lines)
Wife: Could you do the egg bacon spam and sausage without the spam then?
Waitress: Urgghh!
Wife: What do you mean 'Urgghh'? I don't like spam!
Vikings: Lovely spam! Wonderful spam!)
Waitress: Shut up!
Vikings: Lovely spam! Wonderful spam!
Waitress: Shut up! (Vikings stop) Bloody Vikings! You can't have egg bacon
spam and sausage without the spam.
Wife (shrieks): I don't like spam!
Man: Sshh, dear, don't cause a fuss. I'll have your spam. I love it.
I'm having spam spam spam spam spam spam spam beaked beans spam spam
spam and spam!
Vikings (singing): Spam spam spam spam. Lovely spam! Wonderful spam!
Waitress: Shut up!! Baked beans are off.
Man: Well could I have her spam instead of the baked beans then?
Waitress: You mean spam spam spam spam spam spam... (but it is too late and
the Vikings drown her words)
Vikings (singing elaborately): Spam spam spam spam. Lovely spam! Wonderful
spam! Spam spa-a-a-a-a-am spam spa-a-a-a-a-am spam. Lovely spam!
Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Spam spam
spam spam! | | | | Guest | | | | Guest | | Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2002 11:31 am Post subject: |
| | Gee..what a surprise, the rag head papers don't like Israel. I'm sure the "Towel Head Gazette" is your main source of information but anything from the Arab news media is pure anti-american crap. | | | | Guest | | Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2002 11:44 am Post subject: PUT UP OR SHUT UP |
| DEC. 16, 2002 (COL. 3)
PUT UP OR SHUT UP
BY CHARLEY REESE
President George Bush has to put up or shut up. If his administration has hard evidence
that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, he has to put that evidence on the table for
everyone to see. Otherwise his credibility and the credibility of the United States will be
zilch.
It's beginning to appear that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein isn't as stupid as the Bush
administration believed him to be. He has readmitted the inspectors, he's cooperating with
them, and he's made his declaration: We have no weapons of mass destruction; if the United
States and Great Britain have evidence to the contrary, give it to the international
inspectors.
So far, the Bush administration has done nothing but indulge in name-calling, like some
bratty kid on a schoolyard. It's not enough to keep calling Saddam a liar; it's time to prove
it. And if the United States lacks proof, as I personally believe, then it's time to shut up
or else confess the real motives for wanting to go to war. So far, the Bush administration's
credibility hasn't been that great itself.
Item: It made much to-do about Iraq having drone airplanes. The existence of these planes
was made public in 1998. The president even said they could be used in an attack against the
United States, which is patently absurd on its face.
Item: Great Britain recently released a dossier on human-rights violations in Iraq. Again,
it was all old stuff, 10 or 12 years old, and Amnesty International, which had collected the
information in the first place, severely criticized the British government for misusing a
report that the United Kingdom had ignored a decade ago when it was first issued.
Demonization and name-calling do not constitute evidence that Iraq is a threat to the
United States. The Bush administration has no hard evidence that Iraq was involved with
al-Qaida or any other kind of international terrorism. It has twisted the truth about Iraq's
involvement with the Palestinians, implying that Saddam subsidized suicide bombers. The fact
is that Saddam was giving a check to the families of any Palestinian killed in the intifada.
That, of course, included the families of suicide bombers, but the program was not
specifically directed toward them. Don't forget, the Israelis have killed nearly 2,000
Palestinians, most of them civilians. Unlike most Arab governments that only pay lip service
to the Palestinian struggle for independence, Saddam has put his money where his mouth is.
If it is true, as Richard Pearle, the chief warmonger in the Bush administration, has said
publicly, that Bush will go to war against Iraq even if there are no ties to terrorism and no
weapons of mass destruction, the American people had better start raising hell with the
administration. A war without justification can produce catastrophic consequences.
For one thing, with our economy in the shape it is in, much better use for $200 billion can
be found right here at home than to waste it on killing Iraqis. For another, the days when we
can inflict death and destruction on other people in other places without paying a price for
it are over. Making war against Iraq without justification and international support will
produce an enormous increase in terrorism directed at the United States and at Americans
everywhere. For still another, it will alienate allies all over the world.
If genuine, publicly exposed proof can be found that Iraq is in violation and if the United
States goes back to the United Nations Security Council for a second resolution, then all's
well and good. If the president decides to go it alone based on propaganda, he will be making
the mistake of his life. The trouble is it will be other innocent lives, both Iraqi and
American, that will pay for his blunder.
(Write to Charley Reese at P.O. Box 2446, Orlando, FL 32802) | | | | Guest | | Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2002 9:41 pm Post subject: |
| When the Iraqi report is all translated,
when everybody agrees on what it says and doesn't say,
when we all agree on what it says Iraq doesn't have and which sites are "clean"...
That is the time for evidence.
No little holes for Saddam the Weasel to try to sneak through. | | | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |
