War Without End Forum Index

War Without End

The global war against terror, news about the illegal invasion of Iraq, the corporate puppet presidents, the war criminal Tony Blair, September 11th 2001, the USS Liberty and New World Order crimes against humanity.

U.S. expected to approve $14 billion aid request

War Without End Forum Index -> Middle East and Asia
Author Message
Guest
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2002 7:04 am    Post subject: U.S. expected to approve $14 billion aid request

anybody else OUTRAGED? that fellow Americans were denied an extension of unemployment benefits which are about to expire prior to Christmas, Congress voted itself another $5000 pay increase, Bush is about to approve another tax break for the wealthiest ONE PERCENT.....and now this............!
mimi

U.S. expected to approve $14 billion aid request

http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=%20234132&contrassID=2&subContrassID=2&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y&itemNo=234132


By Moti Bassok




Israel will today submit a request for $14 billion in economic aid to U.S. National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice. President George Bush is expected to quickly approve the request - $4 billion in defense aid. and U.S. guarantees for $10 billion - with minor changes, Israeli sources said.

The sources said the Republican congressional majority would approve the aid within 3-6 months. After Finance Ministry director general Ohad Marani and Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's bureau chief Dov Weisglass submit the request, it will be handled by both Israeli and U.S. officials who will determine the duration of the grant and guarantees, and various technical details. The guarantees will apparently be for five years but it is unclear how the defense aid will be laid out.

Sharon told Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz during a meeting eight days ago with Finance Minister Silvan Shalom, that as soon as the U.S. makes a positive decision on the defense grant, he will consent to some of Mofaz's requests for budget increases. The sources say the grant will allow the government to direct defense spending to growth oriented projects.

Some treasury officials are not pleased with the request for such high guarantees, fearing that some of the money will not be directed to growth projects.

However, sources at the prime minister's office say news of the aid will improve the country's international financial standing, and could encourage both local and foreign investors to reconsider Israel. The U.S. aid will also substantially influence the strategic situation in the Middle East.

Sharon first raised the question of aid in his Washington meeting with Bush in mid-October. The formal request was completed by Marani's staff in the past two weeks, with the explanation that Israel has increased military spending in the past two years because of the Palestinian uprising and the expected U.S. war with Iraq. Last week, Turkey and Jordan received generous American military aid of $2 billion to prepare for the possible war with Iraq.

The request for the guarantees - the option of getting improved loan terms from U.S. banks - is based on Israel's need to stabilize the economy and pull out of recession.

Last week Washington approved Israel's annual military aid of $2.16 billion for 2004, and is expected to approve its civil aid soon.
Guest
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2002 6:45 am    Post subject: US Financial Aid To Israel - Figures, Facts And Impact

US Financial Aid To Israel - Figures, Facts And Impact

http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2002/11/12/us-financial-aid-to-israel-figures-facts-and-impact.php
Guest
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2002 7:35 am    Post subject: California Is at Fiscal Brink with Billions to Israel

also see this URL/
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/politics/politics-economy-california.html;
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-California-Budget.html

December 9, 2002
California Is at Fiscal Brink
By JOHN M. BRODER
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/09/national/09CALI.html?pagewanted=print&posi
tion=top

OS ANGELES, Dec. 8 - When times were good and billions of dollars in income
tax payments were pouring in from high-tech millionaires, California
lavished raises on state employees, expanded health care benefits for the
poor, cut taxes on car licenses and invested heavily in education and
transportation.
Those days are over.

With its huge economy stalled and state revenues plunging, California has
descended into its worst budget crisis in a decade and is now facing an
excruciating round of budget cuts and possible tax increases.

State officials are proposing deep reductions in education, health services
and other programs to deal with a budget shortfall that could total $25
billion in the next 18 months.

"That's a hole so deep and so vast that even if we fired every single person
on the state payroll - every park ranger, every college professor and every
Highway Patrol officer - we would still be more than $6 billion short," said
the Assembly speaker, Herb J. Wesson Jr., a Democrat.

Gov. Gray Davis announced a series of steps on Friday intended to save $10.2
billion to plug a deepening hole in the current budget and to serve as a
prelude to even deeper cuts in next year's. Mr. Davis proposed freezing pay
for state workers and warned of large-scale layoffs. As many as 200,000
people could lose their health coverage under the state Medi-Cal program.
Payments to public schools and universities could fall by more than $3
billion.

And that is just the start. In January the governor must propose a budget
for the fiscal year beginning in July that needs to address an expected $15
billion shortfall in revenues. Mr. Davis has not yet proposed tax increases,
but given the deficit magnitude, they appear inevitable.

Other states are confronting similar problems, but California's size and the
bursting of the dot-com bubble make the problem worse here.

The political combatants are entrenching along familiar ideological terrain.
The powerful employee and teachers unions are vowing to resist the pay cuts
and job losses that the governor's plan will require. Republicans have
pledged to reject any new taxes, saying that the Democratic governor and
Legislature spent their way into the current morass and must find program
cuts to claw their way out.

Democrats respond that the budget shortfall results chiefly from a severe
drop in revenue from taxes on capital gains and stock options from the
market run-up of the late 1990's and that those lost revenues must be
replaced with new taxes.

In 2000, the state received $17 billion from taxes on capital gains and the
cashing in of stock options, much of it from the technology industry. State
officials estimate that the take from such taxes this year will be less than
$5 billion.

California prides itself on its progressive income tax, with people earning
high incomes paying a huge share of state taxes. The top 10 percent of
filers pay 75 percent of personal income taxes. But when their income drops,
as it did when the technology boom went bust in early 2000, the state
treasury crashes.

"Nobody expected the loss of revenues due to the drop in the stock market to
be as severe as it has been," said B. Timothy Gage, the state finance
director. "Nobody anticipated the truly staggering extent of the hit we
took. States have not seen such drops since World War II."

California, which generates $1.3 trillion in annual output, is the fifth or
sixth largest economy in the world. (The state is just above or just below
France, depending on the state of the Euro.) The current general fund budget
of $78 billion represents about one-sixth of all state spending nationwide,
but its current-year budget shortfall of $6.1 billion is fully a third of
the cumulative state deficits across the country, according to a survey by
the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Only five states - Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Idaho and Nevada - are in
worse fiscal shape than California as measured by deficits as a percentage
of the budget. In dollar terms, no other state comes close.

Because the California state constitution was amended in 1988 to protect
spending on education and because of rapidly rising health care costs, the
state has few options for reducing spending to plug the gap.

Mr. Wesson, the Assembly speaker, said it was "mathematically impossible" to
balance the state budget without raising taxes.

"The way you do it is to put absolutely everything on the table, every
conceivable cut, every conceivable way to raise taxes," he said. "Then you
sort out what is the least painful and what is the most fair."

James L. Brulte, the Republican leader in the State Senate, said that
raising taxes would not only be insufficient to stanch the red ink but would
also throttle growth when the economy is sputtering.

State output fell by 2.3 percent in 2001, according to the Los Angeles
Economic Development Corporation. The group estimates that the state economy
will grow by a listless 0.8 percent this year. The unemployment rate is 6.6
percent (the national rate is 6.0 percent) and is expected to be worse next
year. Slow economic growth and rising joblessness cause state tax revenues
to plummet and increase costs for social services.

"You can raise the alcohol tax, the tobacco tax, the car tax, the income tax
and sales tax and you still have a multibillion-dollar deficit," said Mr.
Brulte, who represents Rancho Cucamonga and other bedroom communities east
of Los Angeles.

He said the only thing keeping the state afloat was consumer spending, which
continues to grow, modestly.

"Raising taxes on consumers clearly would be counterproductive," he said.
"Raising taxes on business, when we actually need business to step up and
start investing more so we can continue the expansion, would also be
counterproductive. Anything that has the tendency to restrain either
consumer spending or business investment will lead to an even larger deficit
in California."

The problem is especially acute for county and local governments, which
administer the programs that consume the bulk of the state budget - schools,
Medicaid (known here as Medi-Cal), welfare and public safety.

Local officials fear that they will be hit hard by reductions in state
revenue-sharing payments and in shifts in costs now borne by the state.

"They just expect us to make up the difference," said Pat Leary, the
lobbyist for the California State Association of Counties.

Ms. Leary said she hoped Sacramento would rescind the cut in vehicle license
fees that was passed in the dot-com boom. The cut amounted to $4 billion a
year, money the counties now badly need to provide essential services.

"We use it to pay for sheriffs and foster care and others things, and if we
lost that, it would be devastating to counties, absolutely devastating," Ms.
Leary said.

Local school officials are worried, too. While the constitution guarantees
public schools roughly 40 percent of state tax revenue, the state has been
spending more than that share in recent years, and Governor Davis said on
Friday that the overpayments were about to stop.

Wayne Johnson, president of the California Teachers Association, said the
state already ranked 38th in spending per pupil, with class size among the
largest in the country. Any additional reductions "would just push us
further down in those rankings," he said.

Governor Davis took office at the beginning of 1999, with the high-tech
industry roaring and unemployment at about 5 percent. He used the increased
state revenues to invest heavily in schools and highways and to expand
state-financed health services for children and the poor. The number of
state employees grew from 282,000 at the beginning of his tenure to nearly
326,000 in 2001, according to the California Department of Finance. The
biggest job growth came in two areas, prisons and state universities.

Republicans argue that this spending spree caused the current fiscal crisis.
Davis administration officials say that half the spending was on projects
that did not permanently add to the size of state government. Yet the
nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office projects that revenues are so far
short of spending that the state will run deficits of $12 billion to $15
billion for the next five years even if the economy recovers.

In September, Mr. Davis and the Legislature approved several one-time
economic fixes, including restructuring state debt and borrowing against
anticipated revenue from the industrywide tobacco settlement of 1998. But
those were just stopgap measures that offered no help for next year or
beyond.

"Given this, there is really no easy way out of the current predicament,"
said Elizabeth G. Hill, the Legislature's chief budget analyst, "and this
makes it all the more important that the Legislature take advantage of the
alternative budget-balancing approaches and options available to it."

Those include deep cuts in programs, suspension of pay increases for state
employees, elimination of special tax breaks for business and consideration
of tax increases on businesses and individuals. Property taxes, which were
capped by Proposition 13 in 1978, are not an option for new revenue, so many
analysts expect increases in so-called sin taxes on alcohol, tobacco and
gambling.

"California has a very liberal legislature and their easy answer is to pile
more taxes on the business sector, which is already struggling," said Jack
Kyser of the Los Angeles Economic Development Corporation. "And it's not
just business that is nervous," Mr. Kyser said. "County and city governments
are scared half to death.

"It's not a pretty sight."



Copyright The New York Times Company | Permissions | Privacy Policy

"Herein lies a riddle: How can a people so gifted by God become so
seduced by naked power, so greedy for money, so addicted to violence,
so slavish before mediocre and treacherous leadership, so paranoid,
deluded, lunatic?" - Philip Berrigan
*Mutt American
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2002 6:33 pm    Post subject:

California is always broke. It doesn't matter how much money the rest of the country pours into it. Their Left Coast policies make it a socialist money pit.

Let Barbra Streisand bail them out this time.
Guest
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2002 7:13 am    Post subject:

*Mutt American wrote:
California is always broke. It doesn't matter how much money the rest of the country pours into it. Their Left Coast policies make it a socialist money pit.

Let Barbra Streisand bail them out this time.


Let Spielberg and the other rich Zionist Jews bail out Israel instead of having the rogue state bleed the US Taxpayers for billions more which only contributes to increasing our domestic terror risk..

Bush to Send Billions More US Taxpayer Dollars to Israel (no wonder Sharon thinks that the Jews control America):

http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2002/12/16/bush-favors-special-aid-to-israel.php
*Mutt American
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2002 8:05 am    Post subject:

It can be difficult to determine one guest from another, but as far as I can tell, you aren't outraged by your taxpayer dollars. You just want to create an anti-Jew list as long as you can.

Since you are anonymous, why don't you honestly tell us how much you paid in US federal taxes last year, and how much of that you think went to Israel. We don't know who you are. Be honest.
Guest
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2002 6:07 am    Post subject: The Price of Israel

THE PRICE OF ISRAEL

http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2002/12/17/the-price-of-israel.php
Guest
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2002 6:10 am    Post subject: US Financial Aid To Israel - Figures, Facts And Impact

*Mutt American wrote:
It can be difficult to determine one guest from another, but as far as I can tell, you aren't outraged by your taxpayer dollars. You just want to create an anti-Jew list as long as you can.

Since you are anonymous, why don't you honestly tell us how much you paid in US federal taxes last year, and how much of that you think went to Israel. We don't know who you are. Be honest.



US Financial Aid To Israel - Figures, Facts And Impact:


http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2002/11/12/us-financial-aid-to-israel-figures-facts-and-impact.php
 

War Without End Forum Index -> Middle East and Asia
All times are GMT
©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk
Bookmark and Share
Social Links:  Homeowner Association Software  Appliances Reno NV  America Hijacked  Cash System X Review  300 Internet Marketers