| Author | Message | | Guest | | Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2002 2:50 am Post subject: Re: USS LibertyTruth Distorters Spin in San Diego Last Sunda |
| | Anonymous wrote: | | http://members.aol.com/w4lmk/sdari/ | what one hears is most likely morris making an arse out of himself - he's the one asking if someone is a jew, no? he's the one talking about "hell freezing over", no? he's the one who doesn't shut up to allow any of his questions to be addressed, no? nice going morris - especially the part after he left the meeting - talking about zionist is, zionist that - sounds like a small child. | |  | | Guest | | Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2002 6:22 am Post subject: Israeli historian spills beans on USS LIBERTY! |
| Israeli historian spills beans on USS LIBERTY! Subj: Israeli historian spills beans on USS LIBERTY! Date: 11/3/02 3:32:04 PM Pacific Standard Time From: nord@famvid.com A HISTORY OF ISRAEL Ahron Bregman A History of Israel includes new revelations...Bregman reveals new facts never- before-published about the senior Egyptian spy who worked for the Mossad and was nicknamed 'The Son-in-Law' on account of his family ties with President Nasser.' - Rami Tal,Yediot Aharonot A History of Israel examines Israel's turbulent history from the first Zionist Congress in 1897 to the present day. The driving themes of this masterly account are Jewish immigration, war, and attempts to forge peace between Israelis, Arabs and Palestines. Bregman also uses his experience as a journalist to expose secrets never previously published to support his compelling narrative. There is a rare extract from a radio exchange between air control and Israeli pilots on the fourth day of the Six Day War, showing that the Israelis did realize that the ship they were bombing was the American USS Liberty, but still went on to attack it. Also included is the never-before-published protocol of the secret meeting between Foreign Minister Moshe Dayan and President Sadat's emissary Hassan el-Tohami, in Morocco in 1977, which shows that contrary to common belief, no promise was made a priori to President Sadat that he would get the Sinai back before his arrival in Israel. Bregman had access to The Syrian Declaration of Principles of 1992 - the basis for talks between Israel and Syria - and this appears in this book in its entirety for the first time ever. But perhaps the biggest coup is the exclusive revelations on the work of the most senior spy Mossad ever had in Egypt, and possibly in the Arab world. Bregman tells of how the spy turned his back on Mossad at the eleventh hour and betrayed and misled the Israelis to become the jewel in the crown of the Egyptian deception plan for the October 1973 war AHRON BREGMAN is a Lecturer in History at Webster University, London and also a journalist for the Daily Telegraph and other national newspapers in the UK and the US. 352 pp 216x138mm Format: Hardback ISBN: 0333676319 Price: £42.50 Order Format: Paperback ISBN: 0333676327 Price: 13.99 Order | |  | | Guest | | Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2002 6:30 am Post subject: Re: Best Planned "Mistake" |
| | Anonymous wrote: | | http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2002/11/03/best-planned-mistake-in-the-history-of-warfare-uss-liberty.php | weird, the ship wasn't sunk, and all hands weren't killed. what's the claim, the ship was under attack for 2.5 hours. what's wrong with this picture? | |  | | Guest | | Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2002 6:32 am Post subject: Re: USS LibertyTruth Distorters Spin in San Diego Last Sunda |
| | Anonymous wrote: | | http://members.aol.com/w4lmk/sdari/ | morris comes across as a complete jerk. btw, what's with this "we" stuff as displayed on the page, not from morris it would appear. | |  | | dangerousdna | | Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2002 8:07 am Post subject: The enemy within our America |
| Hey you traitor Mike Weeks I smell you on this board hiding behind a guest name incognito. This paper is intended for all the LIBERTY crewmen, and also intended to be a refutation of claims by members of CAMERA and the partisans of Cristol such as SkipperAG and Mike Weeks. http://www.logogo.net/Cristoldissertation.htm Did anybody ever wonder why the proper authorities won't show the actual files on the deliberate attack on the USS LIBERTY if Israel really was innocent? What's their excuse? MW you are like a bloodhound on many boards,whenever anyone posts about Israel you jump right on their backs and TRY to prove them wrong.Why???!!!!! RIGHT THERE MIKE WEEKS SHOWS THAT YOU ARE A TRAITOR TO MY AMERICA!!! You would much rather clap for the Angels winning the World Series rather than hear about how Ward Boston conveyed that Issac Kid thought the attack was deliberate and whitewashed it for the powers above (in Johnson and Mcnamara). You also supported Bamford's book with the EC-121 flying overhead, and that same EC-121 confirmed that the Israeli pilots saw an American flag waving.. Before this, Israel had lied saying that no flag was waving...So you try to lie about how the US flag is waving, you say that it is a tactic used in war that the Egyptian ship was flying an American flag as a ruse.. what a big joke you are Weeks,hahahahaha.. Go help Sharooooon fight the Pali's he will need a smart guy to to watch the flags over Palestine.Since you are more loyal to Israel. You believe Israeli truth distortion about the attack rather than the patriotic Americans that experienced it... Read this you might find something you lied about! New Evidence on Intentional and Brutal Israeli Attack on USS Liberty http://members.aol.com/w4lmk/sdari/ http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2002/11/03/best-planned-mistake-in-the-history-of-warfare-uss-liberty.php | |  | | Guest | | Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2002 4:16 pm Post subject: Loons loose in America |
| "Did anybody ever wonder why the proper authorities won't show the actual files on the deliberate attack on the USS LIBERTY if Israel really was innocent? What's their excuse?" A false assumption followed by a false response doesn't do well in convincing rational folks, but that's never been the idea in the first place. | |  | | Guest | | Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2002 8:02 am Post subject: Re: USS LibertyTruth Distorters Spin in San Diego Last Sunda |
| | Anonymous wrote: | | Anonymous wrote: | | http://members.aol.com/w4lmk/sdari/ | what one hears is most likely morris making an arse out of himself - he's the one asking if someone is a jew, no? he's the one talking about "hell freezing over", no? he's the one who doesn't shut up to allow any of his questions to be addressed, no? nice going morris - especially the part after he left the meeting - talking about zionist is, zionist that - sounds like a small child. | Asking the Israeli lackey Mike Weeks if he was Jewish and/or a Zionist was completely relevant especially when Zionist Jews like A. Cristol (and Weeks who appears to be a Zionist Jew as well ) support and put forth such blatant pro-Israel propaganda (regarding their truth distortion of the intentional and brutal Israeli attack on the USS Liberty). For the truth on the USS Liberty attack (and not the pro-Israel truth distortion and spin put forward by the likes of the "American" traitors Mike Weeks and A. Cristol), access the following URL: http://www.ussliberty.org | |  | | Guest | | Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2002 8:13 am Post subject: Re: Loons loose in America |
| | Anonymous wrote: | "Did anybody ever wonder why the proper authorities won't show the actual files on the deliberate attack on the USS LIBERTY if Israel really was innocent? What's their excuse?" A false assumption followed by a false response doesn't do well in convincing rational folks, but that's never been the idea in the first place. | Even the Israeli lackey and "American" traitor Mike Weeks has mentioned in a Navy Times article that documents (pertaining to the intentional and brutal Israeli attack on the USS Liberty) should be released.. What about the "Operation Cyanide" documents that are apparently still classified as well? Why are they still classified some 35 years later? What is it exactly about "Operation Cyanide" that the US and Israeli governments don't want us to see? "Operation Cyanide" was mentioned in the award winning BBC ("Dead in the Water") documentary which has been recently released (about the intentional and brutal Israeli attack on the USS Liberty) as mentioned at the following URL: http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2002/09/21/bbc-s-dead-in-the-water-about-uss-liberty-wins-h.php | |  | | Guest | |  | | Guest | | Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2002 7:51 am Post subject: Liberty Attack Deliberate/Capt Ward Boston in Navy Times |
| From the June 26 2002 issue of Navy Times: ------------------------------------------ CONFLICTING COMMENTS REKINDLE LIBERTY DISPUTE KEY INVESTIGATORS EXPRESS BELIEF THAT ISRAEL DELIBERATELY ATTACKED U.S. SHIP By Bryant Jordan Times staff writer Thirty-five years after Israeli air and naval forces attacked a lightly armed U.S. Navy spy ship during the Arab-Israeli Six-Day War, the CIA director at the time and the legal counsel to the Navy’s court of inquiry say the attack was deliberate. "It was no accident," former CIA director Richard Helms said May 29, bucking that agency’s June 13, 1967, report that indicated the incident could have been a mistake. Retired Navy legal counsel Capt. Ward Boston says he and the court’s president, the late Rear Adm. Isaac "Ike" Kidd, always believed Israeli forces knowingly attacked the Liberty. "I feel the Israelis knew what they were doing. They knew they were shooting at a U.S. Navy ship," said Boston, who lives in Coronado, Calif. "That’s the bottom line. I don’t care how they tried to get out of it." The attack killed 34 men and wounded 172 others, and sparked a long-running controversy: Did Israel knowingly try to sink the American ship or did it believe the ship was an Egyptian vessel? Officially, the Navy exonerated Israel on June 18, 1967 — 10 days after the attack — when the Navy court of inquiry found that available evidence indicated the attack was a case of mistaken identity. THE COURT OF INQUIRY Boston said Kidd told him he believed the attack was deliberate and that the Israelis knew the ship was American. That flies in the face of the findings of Kidd’s court, and also what the author of a new book on the Liberty says Kidd told him in interviews in the early 1990s. A. Jay Cristol, a federal judge in Florida and retired Navy aviator who also served in the service’s Judge Advocate General’s Corps, is the author of the upcoming "The Liberty Incident." "Kidd told me an entirely different story," said Cristol, whose new book is dedicated to Kidd, who died in 1999. Cristol said that during one interview with Kidd in December 1990, Kidd related that when he brought the court’s report to then-Chief of Naval Operations Adm. David Lamar McDonald, the CNO asked him, "Ike, was it intentional?" "Ike said, ‘No, Admiral,'" Cristol recalled. But Boston remembers that when Kidd returned from Washington, he said officials were not interested in hearing the truth. "In military life, you accept the fact that if you’re told to shut up, you shut up. We did what we were told," Boston said. He explained that he is willing to talk now because "everyone else is shooting their mouth off." Boston said he does not know whether his beliefs were shared by the other members of the court, Capts. Bert M. Atkinson Jr. and Bernard J. Lauff. Lauff could not be located for comment. Atkinson died in 1999. But Boston’s statements do put him now in the camp of retired Adm. Merlin Staring, who as a captain and staff legal officer in London was initially told to review the court’s report. Staring said June 3 that the report was taken from him before he finished his review, but based on what he had seen, the evidence did not support the contention that the attack was an accident. Staring concedes he still has not read the entire report. Staring, who went on to become the Navy’s top JAG officer, is now part of a newly formed Liberty Alliance, which includes former CNO and Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Thomas Moorer and two Marine Medal of Honor recipients, Gen. Ray Davis and Col. Mitchell Paige. The group wants a full congressional investigation into the attack and is lobbying military organizations, including the Veterans of Foreign Wars and the American Legion, hoping to garner support among their members, said Tito Howard, the group’s executive director. SURVIVORS ALLEGE CONSPIRACY Many Liberty survivors and their supporters long have maintained that the attack was deliberate and that the Kidd report excluded testimony from crew members that would have shown that. Boston recalled that testimony was taken from crew members who said the Israelis fired on life rafts when they were put into the water. The court’s report includes testimony indicating the shooting of the life rafts was incidental, occurring when the ship was strafed by Israeli jets. Some allege Israel wanted the spy ship sunk to ensure it did not pick up communications showing Israel was planning to seize the Golan Heights from Syria. Others say it was to prevent Liberty from intercepting communications dealing with an alleged Israeli massacre of Egyptian POWs in the Sinai. Some Liberty survivors and supporters claim the U.S. government covered up the incident to avoid a conflict with Israel that could have cost the Johnson administration support among Jewish voters and supporters. Subsequent administrations and Congresses have avoided a thorough airing of the incident for the same reasons, they say. But Cristol says there have been 10 U.S. investigations, ranging from the court of inquiry and the CIA’s report to several conducted by House and Senate committees. Five drew no conclusions regarding Israel, according to a list compiled by Cristol, while others accepted that it was an accident. The most recent official look at the incident was in 1991, when the House Armed Services subcommittee on investigations found no evidence to support the Liberty survivors’ claim that Israel attacked the ship deliberately. REPORTS AND RECOLLECTIONS The CIA’s report, the earliest of those assembled, held open the possibility that the attack was a case of mistaken identity — the finding that the Kidd court went on to make five days later — though it did not present that as a conclusion. In the June 13, 1967, report, the CIA stated that "an overzealous pilot" could have mistaken the Liberty for an Egyptian ship, the El Quesir. Helms, the former CIA director, declined to discuss the incident at length. "I’ve done all I can. I don’t want to spend the rest of my life in court" testifying about the incident, he said. Mike Weeks, a naval aviation writer and amateur historian who studied the official Navy communications that occurred during and after the attack and believes it was an accident, said there is more information on the Liberty still classified and believes the government should release all of it. "Just put it out there and see how it flows," he said. "The bottom line, all this stuff ought to be let loose, for heaven’s sake." ------------------ Bryant Jordan is a staff writer for Marine Corps Times. | |  | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |