War Without End

Guest · Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2002 3:59 pm Post subject: How To Be Named an Anti-Semite

HOW TO BE NAMED AN ANTI-SEMITE

The term anti-Semite as used here is one utilized as a catch-all phrase by
various activist groups such as the Zionists, Israel Firsters, The Jewish Defense
League, and also by those Jews unaware of what the phrase truly implies. Many
peoples of the Middle East can be classified as "Semites," but it appears that
some Jews have appropriated the term to mean only Jews - which is historically
incorrect.

TO BE NAMED AN ANTI-SEMITE IN THE CURRENT WORLD IS EASY; ALL
YOU HAVE TO DO IS ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:

1. Disagree with any action by any Jewish person at any time.

2. Take issue with the secular Israeli aggression against Palestinian and Arabs
occurring anywhere in the Middle East.

3. Mention that Israel is truly a contrived, artificial state that was thrust upon the
Palestinians and their land by the US, Britain, and the UN, despite how the
Palestinian owners of the land did protest.

4. Criticize the JDL in any way or any manner even if it is shown that they tell
outright lies about history, current events, Christians, Islamics, and other Jews
who do not toe the Zionist-Israel party line.

5. Anyone who mentions that the United States, because of Israel Uber Alles
infiltrators in our administration, congress, industry, business, and financial
institutions in our country, our taxpayers have sent gratis over one hundred
billion dollars ($100,000,000,000) down the ratholes of Tel Aviv and Jerusalem,
in the form of cash, arms, goods, and services.

6. US Patriots who expose the fact that there are proved Israeli spies operating
cells in America, working hand in glove with traitors like Jonathan Pollard and
his wife, some spies of late in the guise of art students, who provide Israel with
US military and industrial secrets, some of which are kept and used, and some
that are to be sold for gain, even to enemies of America.

7. Speak out against the secular Israeli government run by Ariel Sharon and his
jackboots who use American armaments to kill from afar hapless Palestinian
men, women, and children, while they are safe in their American made helicopter
gunships, tanks, and APC's, and use their missiles and heavy weapons against
kids with stones, and men with small arms - ineffective against tank cannons.

8. Decry the evil actions of the IDF who in Palestinian cities use their Uzis and
sniper rifles to pick off kids, old women, old men, and anyone else they can sight
in on. It is a game to the IDF, called shooting fish in a barrel.

9. Talk about true Jewish young men who have refused to join in the bloodbath
that is Palestine, and are ostracized by the Sharonistas, castigated by the Israeli
press, and are subject to punitive action by the Israeli government.

10. Discuss the fact that there are many fine, truly Jewish youngsters and
students who hate the IDF's murdering of Palestinians, and have held peace
rallies to that effect, rallies that go unreported by the pro-Israel media in the US
and the world.

11. Expose the news that the US has provided the Israeli "navy" with
submarines and destroyers, possibly to monitor life in the dead sea or the sea of
Galilee.

12. Tell the citizens of the US that although many nuclear capable nations have
signed a nuclear non-proliferation agreement, that Israel has not, and until very
recently denied having nuclear capabilities. It is estimated by intelligence
services that Israel has over 400 nuclear warheads, and missile technology
furnished by the United States to deliver them.

13. Refer to anything about the fact that secular Israel deliberately attacked and
tried to sink the USS Liberty, a US Navy Elint vessel that was in international
waters at the time. Pro-Israelis in the US government resisted any type of full
blown hearings on the attack, simply to protect Israel against American adverse
opinion. Incidentally, many of the world's encyclopedias, fact books, public
records, libraries, etc., have had articles and news about the attack on the
Liberty surreptitiously removed, most by agents of Israel. (See James Ennes's
book: "Assault on the Liberty," if you can find it in your library or bookstore)

14. Avow that according to international law, water that emerges within
national boundaries belongs to that nation - in this case Lebanon - and no other
nation - in this case Israel - has the right to militarily attack Lebanon to steal
water, as Israel has threatened to do.

15. Reveal that the true goal of Ariel Sharon and his secular Israeli government
is in the process of eliminating the rights in Israel of any persons they feel are
not Jewish, or Jewish enough for them.

16. Elaborate on the fact that there are almost 200,000 Christians who traveled
from Russia to Israel under the guise of being Jewish, and that there are many
Christian Orthodox services being held by these people, thereby presenting a
problem to the Sharonistas.

17. Boldly state that Iraq has ignored edicts from the United Nations, and looks
as though they will be attacked by a US-Britain led coalition to topple Saddam
Hussein, Israel has not complied with far more than that, and their excuse is, the
UN is anti-Semitic. Perhaps the coalition should zero in on Israel and depose
the evilness of Ariel Sharon.

18. Dare to imply that Israel is a friend of the United States only as long as
money keeps flowing from American taxpayers to Israel, or inquire as to Swiss
bank accounts, kept filled by the flow, owned by certain individuals in Israel.
Where is the CIA? In bed with the Mossad?

19. Let all know that even in the laws of the United States, Israel is mentioned
by name almost 80 times, the points being to protect Israel at all cost, and to
provide cash, goods, and services to Israel at the expense of the US taxpayer

CONCLUSION:

Yes, those statements are only a few of many that will get you called an anti-
Semite, or a self-hater if you are Jewish, but if you are factual in your words, and
stand behind them, you will prevail against the scatological name-callers extant.
The truth will protect you, no matter what how the liars twist and spin, on the
net, or anywhere.

Just remember what distinguished editor and columnist, Brent Bozell, once
stated in no uncertain terms:

"The only thing worse that the charge of anti-Semitism, is the false charge of
anti-Semitism."

Wonderful words; wonderful guidance; wonderful philosophy!

Dr. E.A. Richards

hedh@boo.net · Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2002 7:13 pm Post subject: How to be named a moron

By falling for the phoney Doc Richards BS...you can be named a moron.

Guest · Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2002 7:27 pm Post subject:

dangerousdna · Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2002 9:37 am Post subject: Re: How to be named a moron

turtle · Posted: Sun Oct 27, 2002 10:05 pm Post subject: reply

I am a Jewish women who has family in Israel and I was born in the USA. I lived in Israel for 4 years so have seen many things that make me agree with what you have written. I also have a Morrocan son in law who i love and I consider his extended family my family. I talk to my "family" all the time about the situation in the mid east. I know the pain they feel as thery see fellow arabs and muslims abused and stripped of their rights by a people who should really know better. How can survivors of the holacaust act as bad as hitler is beyond me but in some cases they do. I love my family in Isreal and know that they want peace. I also know some Paslestinans in palestine that deserve peace and a home land as well. If i tell this to my parents they are furious with me but I often think many Jews are completely blind to any of Israelsfaults. why don't they open their eyes and see what is happening. I saw it in 1975 when I lived there. It was obvious , the racism that many Israelis feel towards the arabs. I agree with what you wrote and hope that more Jews will open their eyes to what their fellows are doing

adela 100 · Posted: Sun Oct 27, 2002 10:10 pm Post subject: the rights of return

does any one remember how pakistan was formed? how many millions were
forcibly removed by edict of the U.N. to make way for a tottally moslem population? where are their rights of return? incidentally to those who love to report how much money israel has received from the U.S do you know that Israel has always repaid all monies owed? And lastly if there was any courageous and intelligent leadership
amongst those people calling themselves Palestinians they would have alligned with
Isreal who along with the U.N would have watched the new fledgling states back
from attack by Syria and the rest of the Arab world who have nothing but contempt for
them.

Guest · Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2002 8:11 pm Post subject:

Wage Peace, Not War

Conflict in Kashmir could vaporise millions, but the world's 'moral leaders' are looking away

George Monbiot

June 4, 2002

There is something dreamlike about our contemplation of the drift to war in Kashmir. While India and Pakistan move their missiles into position, in Britain our concerns are focused on the evacuation of our own citizens, the destination of the likely refugees, and the possibility that the Indian cricket team might be prevented from visiting England at the end of this month. That 12 million people could be vaporised if the war begins in earnest is viewed as regrettable, but nothing to do with us.

In the United States, the sense of detachment is even more palpable. On Sunday, President Bush told the nation that "we cannot put our faith in the word of tyrants, who solemnly sign non-proliferation treaties, and then systematically break them. If we wait for threats to fully materialise, we will have waited too long." But he was talking not about India or Pakistan, but about rogue states which might one day attack the US. He mentioned "South Asia" once, but only as an example of a region whose leaders had been recruited to his cause.

In waging war, Bush and Blair were tumid with moral leadership and purpose. In waging peace, they display only vapidity and irresolution. Deputies are dispatched on half-hearted missions to ask the two governments to negotiate, but no one is proposing the measures necessary to prevent what could become the most lethal conflict since the second world war. The "moral imperatives" so often invoked during the bombing of Afghanistan turn out to be nothing more than old-fashioned power politics. Now, with few clearly formulated domestic interests at stake, the new world order's moral leaders are looking the other way.

Even if Britain, the US and the other western powers had no prior involvement in this conflict, our moral duty to help develop an effective international response would be unquestionable. But we are up to our necks in it. The subcontinent's dispute is our dispute, and to turn away from it could constitute the greatest collective dereliction since the failure of both the German people and the allied powers to intervene in the Holocaust.

In 1947, the Maharajah of Kashmir, a Hindu installed by the British, decided neither to seek independence nor to join Pakistan, despite the fact that the majority of his people were Muslims, but to surrender the territory to India. The British governor-general, Lord Mountbatten, insisted only that a referendum or plebiscite of the Kashmiri people be conducted. This never happened, and Britain, which could have asked the UN to demand that the promise was kept, left India and Pakistan to tear the place apart.

More recently, both states have drawn strength from the effective licence granted to them by the US. In 1998, President Clinton announced a "quantum leap" in US relations with India, which the government there interpreted as a permit to resume nuclear testing. Last year, the nuclear sanctions levied on Pakistan were lifted in return for its cooperation in the war on terror. President Bush described General Musharraf (who enjoys the same degree of democratic legitimacy as Saddam Hussein) as a "man of great courage and vision", and promised a new $200m aid package. Musharraf relaxed his grip on the militants slipping into India.

But at least the US has blocked new arms sales to India and Pakistan. The United Kingdom, by contrast, has done everything in its power to promote them. Blair, who refuses to dirty his own hands, has sent the defence secretary and the deputy prime minister to Delhi to sell Hawk aircraft. The UK has continued to supply the spare parts for the Jaguar jets (built under licence from the British company BAE), which India may use to drop the bomb. Our moral leader deputes his officials to explain that if we don't do it, someone else will.

More pertinent still, the nuclear weapons programmes in both India and Pakistan were initiated with the help of the west. As the Nuclear Control Institute has documented, both programmes emerged from the civilian industry, which was kickstarted with the help of the US "Atoms for Peace" scheme. India's first nuclear device used plutonium produced by a Canadian research reactor and extracted in a reprocessing plant built with the help of the US. Germany supplied tritium, beryllium, heavy water plants and reprocessing components; France delivered uranium and fast-breeder technology; Norway sold heavy water; the US provided enriched uranium and several commercial reactors; and the UK distributed fuel, furnaces and the country's first research reactor.

Pakistan's heavy water plants came from Canada and Belgium; its uranium enrichment technology, beryllium, tritium, furnaces and milling machines from Germany; its research reactor from the US; and its reprocessing technology from France and the UK. All of these components have potential uses in nuclear weapons programmes; most appear to have been deployed for this purpose by India and Pakistan.

Britain and the US point out that much of the new nuclear material the enemies are using comes from China. This is true, but China also appears to believe it has a licence to operate. In 1998, Clinton approved a US-China nuclear cooperation agreement, despite intelligence briefings showing that China was supplying both Iran and Pakistan with nuclear components, in direct contravention of this treaty. Within a month of the signing of the agreement, China began shipping heavy water to Pakistan, in far greater quantities than its civilian programme could have used. The agreement stood.

There are plenty of instruments the international community could use to prevent a nuclear war. It could explain to India and Pakistan that if either nation escalates even the conventional conflict, its leaders could expect to face a war crimes tribunal. It could not only discontinue all arms sales but also apply punitive sanctions to any company assisting the weapons industry in either nation. Most importantly, it could send peacekeepers to hold the lines apart and supervise disarmament. Blair and Bush should both be in Kazakhstan right now, helping Putin to knock heads together.

But there is no peace industry commensurate with the world's war industry. There are no vested interests to appease, no campaign contributions to be gained from preventing rather than encouraging the use of weapons. As a result the hundreds of thousands of peacekeepers whose deployment is required in Kashmir do not exist. While wars are plotted in loving detail, there is no global peace plan for the territory, despite 55 years of conflict.

In the new world order of which Bush and Blair have spoken, international support for a war pursued for domestic purposes is a moral imperative. Preventing two nations from vaporising each other's civilians is a moral luxury, rather less pressing than the jubilee tea parties or the next visit by the Indian cricket team. Faced with the frightening and complicated task of waging peace rather than war, moral leadership turns to moral flight.

Guest · Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2002 11:10 pm Post subject:

Guest

http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2002/10/31/why-the-rise-in-anti-semitism-in-europe.php

Krcun · Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2002 8:04 pm Post subject: Anti-Semitism

Let's all agree once for all that an Antisemite is a person who disapproves of Israel's treatement of Palestinians and the US support of it, and nothing else. According to this definition I am an Antisemite and very proud of it.
Simply dont understand what is all fuss about.[/b]

War Without End

The global war against terror, news about the illegal invasion of Iraq, the corporate puppet presidents, the war criminal Tony Blair, September 11th 2001, the USS Liberty and New World Order crimes against humanity.

How To Be Named an Anti-Semite