| Author | Message | | Guest | |  | | We | | Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2002 1:26 am Post subject: Wake up call |
| http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/signs.htm
New! September 29, 2002 - One of the great unsolved mysteries of the
period leading up to 9/11 is the extent of
an Israeli spy operation in the US
uncovered by Carl Cameron of Fox News and
widely reported, including in this
space . As we all know, everybody spies on
everybody, “friends” and foes alike.
But this operation is believed to have been
so extensive, and wide-ranging, that
the real question in regard to Israeli
foreknowledge of 9/11 is, as one US federal
agent put it to Cameron, “How could they
not have known?” Now, however, more
evidence of the Israeli connection is
emerging...
Both Israeli and US government officials
scoffed at these charges as an “urban
myth.” Their denials, however, were
somewhat undermined by the leaking of the
US government’s own report on “suspicious
activities” by Israelis around US
government offices and military
installations. The report, culled from information
supplied by numerous federal agencies,
documents what is obviously a
large-scale intelligence operation directed
against US government facilities. Now
more documentary evidence of the Israeli
connection to 9/11 comes with the
emergence of the US government’s own list
of terrorist suspects, two versions of
which Cryptome.com has obtained and posted,
with the following information as
to their provenance: [one list] has a number of American names as
well, one Frenchman, and — lo and behold! — there
is our old friend Dominik Suter, listed right between Eyad Suleiman,
a native of Kuwait, and Sheikh Amed Salim Swedan, a
Kenyan.
Suter, you’ll remember, is the fellow behind the mysterious Urban
Moving Systems, whose employees were arrested after
neighbors reported them laughing and cheering as they watched the
World Trade Center burn. These five “Middle
Eastern-looking men,” as described by witnesses, were Israelis: they
were found with box cutters in their van, $4,000 in
cash, and multiple passports. Police interrogated them for hours, and
transferred them to a maximum security facility,
where they were held for months. Their van was registered as the
property of Urban Moving Systems: A raid on the
Urban Moving Systems warehouse yielded computers, documents, and
other evidence — of what, we don’t know. Suter,
the owner of the company, refused all comment, and soon fled the
country — to Israel.
The inclusion of Suter, an Israeli, and the front man for what even
the Forward acknowledges was a Mossad operation,
on an official list of terrorist suspects should silence, for good,
those who dismiss the Israeli connection to 9/11 as a
“myth,” urban or otherwise. [...] On that list, along with Mohammed
Atta , and Zacarias Moussaoui, is not only Suter,
but also five other Americans — or, at least, non-Arabs with US
addresses. What’s up with that?
Only God, and the higher echelons of the US government, know for
sure. What we do know is this: it is no longer
possible to deny that the US government believes Israel had some
connection to the events leading up to 9/11. The
documentary evidence, along with the reported testimony of patriots
within law enforcement, is accumulating to the
point where it can no longer be ignored. Just how far does Israeli
malevolence go? I’m afraid we’re about to find out...
Comment: The fact that the above documents and ideas are once again
being "leaked" suggests to us that there are
some crosses and double crosses in the hallowed halls of government
that will be "gradually revealed."
As we have said before, and will say again, the Ultimate Objective of
the US Consortium, demonstrated by the reams of
evidence, is to destroy ALL Semites - Arabs and Jews together. This
has been the agenda since the turn of the 19th
century. It was the agenda behind the American funding of eugenics
and Hitler. It was the agenda behind the formation
of the state of Israel as a place to gather all Jews together to make
it easier to destroy them. It is the agenda behind
the pretended "friendship" of the US and Britain with Israel. It is
the agenda behind their manipulations of Mossad to plan
and execute the 9-11 attacks using mind controlled Arab pilots as
patsies. It is the reason that there is so much
evidence that the CIA, FBI, and other alphabet soup guys knew what
was going on, but did nothing. It is the reason
that Bush knew what was coming down, and did nothing. Mossad and
Israel were falling right in line with the plans for
the Final Solution.
Now and again, the facade slips, and those who pretend to be the
friends of Jews are seen showing their true colors. A
recent example is a series of remarks made by Billy Graham to Richard
Nixon, revealed when 500 hours of Nixon tapes
were released by the National Archives. Most were recorded between
January and June 1972, but I can assure you, the
attitudes behind closed doors in government have not changed even if
the tactics have.
In the conversation with Nixon, the Southern Baptist evangelist
expressed disdain for what he saw as Jewish domination
of the media. "This stranglehold has got to be broken or this
country's going down the drain," Graham said, agreeing with
Nixon's own comments earlier in the conversation. "You believe that?"
Nixon says in response. "Yes, sir," says Graham.
"Oh boy. So do I," Nixon agrees, then says: "I can't ever say that
but I believe it." "No, but if you get elected a second
time, then we might be able to do something," Graham says, reassuring
the president.
Just keep in mind that Nixon was pardoned by Ford, and George Bush I
was appointed director of the CIA by Ford. I
seriously doubt that the opinions of these guys have changed a bit.
But they are now, oh so cleverly, using the Jews'
own control of the Media to set Israel up for total destruction. And
how easily and gleefully the Jews are taking the bait.
Their priests have fed them so long with the lies that they are
"chosen" and that Israel is theirs by right, that it's easy
to make them hate their close kin, the Palestinians and its
pathetically simple to dangle the carrot of "we'll help you get
rid of those nasty Palestinians if you'll help us with Media spin
control." And so, the Devil's bargain is struck.
According to a biography of Richard Nixon, his close personal and
political ties with the Bush family go back
to 1941 when Nixon claims he read an ad in an L A. newspaper,
placed by a wealthy group of businessmen,
led by Preston Bush, the father of George Bush. They wanted a
young, malleable candidate to run for
Congress. Nixon applied for the position and won the job. Nixon
became a mouthpiece for the Bush group.
(Source: Freedom Magazine, 1986, L.F. Prouty).
In fact, Preston Bush is credited with creating the winning
ticket of Eisenhower-Nixon in 1952.(Source:
George Bush, F. Green, Hipocrene, 1988).
The reason why Bush will "do anything" is because his hands have
as much of Kennedy's blood on them as do
Nixon's, Hunt's, Sturgis's, Felix Rodriguez's and Gerald Ford's.
This White House gang fears that if the public
ever realizes how they shot their way into power it could set off
a spark that would destroy their fragile
fraud and land them in jail.
The following commentary from the Jordan Star raises questions about
the "Christian Zionist" pact. What the writer does
not realize is the level of deception of those in power manipulating
Christians to support Israeli agendas, all the while
they are holding their own opinions exactly as those expressed in
private by Billy Graham and Richard Nixon - caught on
tape - a rare peek inside the minds of the Conspirators. When the
author says "Politics makes strange bedfellows," I
don't think he realized that the Jews are sleeping with the enemy.
It is said politics often makes strange bedfellows, but nothing
could be more perverse than the growing
partnership between American Jews and Christian Zionists in
support of Israel. While the pro-Israeli lobby has
long been successful in subverting US interests for the sake of
Israel, the growing influence of Christian
Zionism over United States foreign policy in the Middle East
represents a dangerous trend in American
politics. [...] The efforts of Christian Zionists to manipulate
current policy-making adds a disturbing dimension
to an already biased and unfair US foreign policy for the Middle
East.
n the days following the attacks, fundamentalist Christian
leaders like Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson
compared the attacks on the United States to Palestinian attacks
against Israeli occupation. Despite the
fact that no comparison can be made between those who attacked
the United States and legitimate
Palestinian resistance against Israelis occupation of Palestinian
lands, Christian Zionists have succeeded in
linking the two in the eyes of many in the US Congress and the
Bush administration. To make matters worse,
Christian Zionists have joined forces with the pro-Israeli lobby
in demonizing the Muslim world and supporting
Israel's brutal campaign against the Palestinian people.
Christian Zionists across the US are raising millions to
benefit Israel, and they are also engaged in a well-orchestrated
public relations campaign to distort American
perceptions regarding the current Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Christian Zionists have strong ties with the Republican
leadership in the American Congress, and recent
statements by Republican leaders on Capitol Hill reflect their
power and prestige. Recently, House Majority
Whip Tom Delay of Texas told AIPAC's policy conference the West
Bank and Golan Heights weren't occupied
territories but part of Israel. House Republican Majority Leader
Dick Armey (R-TX) went even further calling
for the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from the Occupied
Territories on MSNBC's high-rated program Hardball
with Chris Matthews. [...]
"We are not willing to sacrifice Israel for the notion of a
Palestinian homeland," Armey said, asserting that
"the Palestinians should leave." Such sentiments by influential
Republican leaders-combined with Bush's
appalling silence during Israel's latest invasion-reflect the
growing political impact of Christian Zionists on US
policy toward the Middle East. While the Bush administration
wages war against Islamic fundamentalism in
Afghanistan and the Middle East, Christian Zionism continues to
gain support in the United States, with
devastating effects on US foreign policy.
Here is something for you
to think about: As we have
noted in our comments on
the Pentagon Strike, this
event is the smoking gun.
Anybody with eyes and two
neurons firing can examine
the evidence and come to
the inescapble conclusion
that no Boeing 757 hit the
Pentagon. That is a cold,
hard, incontrovertible fact.
You can take it to the
bank.
Please, take the time to
check all the links we have
provided in the archives
linked at the bottom of the
page; read all the many
theories; look at all the
photographs; and most of
all, THINK. You will find, as
we did, that the "official
government position" on this
event is not just weak and contradictory, it is not merely arrogant
and self-serving, it is obviously deliberate and
bald-faced LYING. With all the questions about this event being
asked, the government response is to make any
investigation either impossible, or classified. At the same time,
they are beating the drums of war and trying like crazy to
create a distraction. And, for many Americans, it is working. Many
Americans will nod their heads sagely and pronounce
"Oh, you can't trust the government," and turn right around and
believe every lie told to them because they trust the
MEDIA!
However, as we have also revealed, the lions of Industry, including
the MEDIA, seem to be party to this Fraud. The fact
that an enormous number of them are Jews does not, however, suggest a
Jewish conspiracy to take over the world as
the REAL Conspirators would like for "conspiracy theorists" to think.
That is only a smoke screen. It does suggest,
however, that the Consortium has been "playing the Jews" by
pretending to align with them, by pretending to have
similar goals, by pretending to want to help them. It's the oldest
Machiavellian trick in the book. And the Jews are falling
for it hook, line and sinker.
Getting back to the Pentagon crash, the most important thing to think
about is this: The current administration lied, and
is continuing to lie about this crash. It was not a Boeing 757, and
they are lying about it. That is the simple fact on
which all other conjectures must be formulated. It is also a lie that
the Mass Media is assisting in promulgating. So we
may assume that they have a "joint agenda" at some level even if we
think it is a pact among thieves.
We still must face the fact that the government has LIED about a 757
hitting the Pentagon.
We have provided some documentation as to the probable means of this
strike: a drone craft modified to "appear" as an
airliner with modified wings that would clip lamp poles as it dove
for its target. We have shown the documentation that
there is a "guidance" system that exactly describes the behavior of
this "plane" as it homed in on its pre-programmed
target. In short, all of the "anomalies" of the incident can be
easily explained with current technology. There is no need
for "holograms" or magical 4th density bait and switch games. Purely
and simply, a deliberate strike was made on the
Pentagon to produce a certain impression.
Why would the government lie about Flight 77 crashing into the
Pentagon?
What seems to be the most likely conjecture is that, just as Pearl
Harbor was a strike against our military and aroused
public support for a war, it was thought that a strike against the
Pentagon would serve the same purpose. It also seems
likely that the "planners" of this event felt that a strike against
the military command center would serve the purpose of
being perceived as an "act of war." We also notice that nothing the
Administration has done since the 9-11 event has
made any sense whatsoever if they were really concerned about
"terrorism." It is all about a War without End.
Again: The smoking gun is the strike on the Pentagon and the obvious
fact that the government lied and continues to lie
about it. This is the weak link in the whole operation. This is the
Achilles Heel of the Fraud being perpetrated as an
"Attack on America." This is where the pressure needs to be applied.
This is where the revelations will come from as to
the true nature and intentions of the REAL TERRORISTS - the Bush
Administration. And this is where we have to move to
the next logical step:
If the government LIED about the attack on the Pentagon, WHAT
HAPPENED TO FLIGHT 77 and its passengers?
Which brings us to the answer:
Our government is in the hands of men who think nothing of crashing
commercial jets into large buildings; jets with
human beings, their own citizens onboard; buildings full of human
beings, their own citizens. Our government is in the
hands of men who think nothing of planning and executing a precision
strike against their own command center - the
oldest Machiavellian trick in the book - to garner support and
sympathy for nefarious objectives. And finally, our
government is in the hands of men who obviously diverted and landed a
commercial jet liner with innocent people on
board, and cold-bloodedly murdered them - including children - to use
their body parts to support the lie that a
commercial jet crashed into the Pentagon - which it obviously did
NOT.
In short, our government is not merely in the hands of LIARS, they
are also MURDERERS and have committed TREASON
against their own people. And even if they didn't do it with their
own hands, even if they manipulated someone else to
do it, they are as guilty as any "accessory after the fact." The
crime of accessory after the fact, a common law felony,
is committed when one who, with knowledge of another's guilt, renders
assistance to a felon in an effort to hinder his
detection, arrest, trial or punishment.
The definition of an accessory after the fact is one of ancient
origin . . . [requiring that:] '1. The felony must be
completed; 2. [Defendant] must know that the felon is guilty; 3.
[Defendant] must receive, relieve, comfort or assist
him.
"Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been
committed, receives, relieves, comforts, or
assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension,
trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.
Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an
accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more
than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or fined not more than
one-half the maximum fine prescribed for the
punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal is
punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be
imprisoned not more than ten years."
What the attack on the Pentagon demonstrates clearly is that the
Current United States Administration, and numerous
Media moguls, physically did "receive, relieve, comfort, and assist"
the individuals who committed the "Attack on America"
on Sept. 11, 2001 by their incessant promotion of the idea that
Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon.
There is also "aiding and abetting." To find the current
administration guilty of the 9-11 attack on America, it is not
necessary to find that they personally committed the crime. They are
guilty because it is evident that they intentionally
helped [or encouraged] someone else to commit the crime. This was the
"failure of Intelligence." It was intentional.
To find the Bush Regime guilty of the 9-11 attack on America as an
aider and abettor, we need only be convinced of the
following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
(A) First, that the crime was committed.
(B) Second, that the current regime helped to commit the crime [or
encouraged someone else to commit the crime].
(C) And third, that the Bush Regime intended to help commit [or
encourage] the crime.
"Whoever commits an offense against the United States, or aids,
abets, counsels, commands, induces, or procures its
commission, is punishable as a principal. Whoever willfully causes an
act to be done, which if directly performed by him or
another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable
as a principal." Aiding and abetting is a method of
making a co-defendant equally culpable when another defendant
actually carried out the substantive offense. A
defendant need not be specifically charged with aiding and abetting
to be convicted under 18 U.S.C. §2, but can be
charged as a principal and convicted as an aider and abettor.
Standefer v. United States, 447 U.S. 10, 100 S. Ct. 1999,
64 L. Ed. 2d 689 (1980).
"In order to aid and abet another to commit a crime it is necessary
that a defendant 'in some sort associate himself with
the venture, that he participate in it as in something that he wishes
to bring about, that he seek by his action to make it
succeed'."
What the attack on the Pentagon demonstrates clearly is that the
Current United States Administration, physically did
something to help [or encourage] the crime with the intent that the
crime be committed.
With the growing world opposition to the agenda of Bush and the
Warmongers, with the rising tide of questions being
asked about the 9-11 events, and the growing awareness of the people
that something just isn't "right" in the White
House, just what do we think the Bush Gang is going to do next?
Just recently the Shrub has been reduced to the pathetic ruse of
whining "Saddam tried to kill my daddy! Poor, poor,
pitiful me!" They are really running out of excuses.
But remember, these are clearly cold-blooded killers with a LOT at
stake here. If the right questions are asked, if the
right agencies swing into action, Bush and the Gang run the risk of
literally going to prison. This is not Watergate where
a presidential pardon will stop prosecution. This is cold-blooded
murder.
Now, the question: Do you think that, if their plans are thwarted,
that they have anything to lose in trying even more
daring tactics?
If so, what will they be? What can they do NOW to pull everything
back on track that is rapidly going South on them?
Well, the first things that come to mind are 1) Produce another major
"terrorist" attack of some sort. Who knows? They
may even find it necessary to sacrifice a few of their
co-conspirators to divert attention. 2) Suddenly discover that
Israel is the REAL guilty party and declare the entire 9-11 event to
be the responsibility of Mossad, which gives the US a
good reason to just directly go after Isreal.
Those are just two possibilities. I'm sure the readers can think of
others.
One thing is certain: the Bush Gang have gone too far over the line
to pull back now.
===
Bush losing ground in diplomatic and political offensive on Iraq -
Tom Daschle drew blood on the floor of the US
Senate, denouncing the politicization of the prospect of a military
offensive against Baghdad, which the Bush
administration believes is assembling an arsenal of weapons of mass
destruction. A draft resolution presented by the US
leader to lawmakers would have earned him a blank check to wage a war
against the leader that Bush on Thursday
called "the guy who tried to kill my dad," a reference to former
president George Bush.
Senator Ted Kennedy, older brother of the assassinated US president
John F. Kennedy, said war should be "should be a
last resort, not the first response."
Former vice president Al Gore offered the most searing criticism of
the Bush administration's strategy of preemptive
strikes against purported threats to the United States. "If what
America represents to the world is leadership in a
commonwealth of equals, then our friends are legion," Gore said at
the Commonwealth Club, a respected San
Francisco-based public affairs forum. "If what we represent to the
world is an empire, then it is our enemies who will be
legion."
Almost daily Bush comes back to his refrain: "If the United Nations
Security Council won't deal with the problem, the
United States and some of our friends will." However, the US leader
has yet to elaborate as to who these "friends" are.
Comment: Daily I am appalled at the embarrassment of having this
nincompoop as our president. Again I say, let's
IMPEACH the whole lot of them.
More:
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/signs.htm | | | | Guest | | Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2002 4:20 am Post subject: |
| | We: That was truly a waste of bandwidth. There are people going hungry for bandwidth in China. Please think of the children. | | | | *Mutt American | | Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2002 4:23 am Post subject: Gore Shouldn't Throw Stones at This House |
| Gore Shouldn't Throw Stones at This House
Charles Krauthammer
Charles Krauthammer is a syndicated columnist based at The Washington Post.
September 29, 2002
A pudding with no theme but much poison. Such was the foreign policy speech Al Gore delivered in San Francisco Monday. It was a disgrace - a series of cheap shots strung together without logic or coherence. Most of all, it was brazen, delivered as if there had been no Clinton-Gore administration, no 1990s.
The speech's tone is best reflected in Gore's contemptuous dismissal of the U.S. victory in Afghanistan as "defeating a fifth-rate military power." If the Taliban were a fifth-rate military power, why didn't the Clinton-Gore administration destroy it and spare us Sept. 11?
It is not as if, during Gore's term, al- Qaida had not declared itself nor established its postal address. It issued a declaration of war on the United States, blew up our embassies in Kenya and Tanzania and attacked the USS Cole. What did Gore's administration do? Fire a few missiles into the Afghan desert and a Sudanese pharmaceutical factory, then wash its hands and leave the problem to its successors.
Why didn't the Clinton-Gore administration go after this fifth-rate military power? This is a question that even Russia's President Vladimir Putin has asked. In an interview with the German newspaper Bild shortly after Sept. 11, Putin recounted having talked to the Clinton administration about Osama bin Laden: "They wrung their hands so helplessly, and said, 'The Taliban are not turning him over, what can one do?' I remember I was surprised. If they are not turning him over, one has to think and do something." They did nothing. Gore now scorns the success of the man who did something.
Considering the glass house he inhabits, Gore's attack on Bush is remarkably ad hominem. He implies, first, that the president is going after Iraq to distract attention from not finding bin Laden. And second, that Bush is doing this for electoral purposes.
Interesting charges. On Aug. 17, 1998, Gore's president, the one he declared "will be regarded in the history books as one of our greatest presidents," made his Monica Lewinsky confession on national television and then slinked away to Martha's Vineyard for penance and isolation. Then, less than three days later, he returned from oblivion with that ostentatious commander-in-chief walk from Marine One to the Oval Office to announce his response to the African embassy bombings: his useless cruise missile salvo against Afghanistan and Sudan.
Then, that December, another bombing spasm, a three-day affair against Iraq that similarly achieved nothing. Operation Desert Fox occurred right in the midst of the House debate on impeachment. The timing was so wag-the-dog precise that it actually caused a postponement of the vote, with some Democrats suggesting that with the country in crisis the impeachment proceedings should be canceled altogether and the whole mess left to the next Congress.
Gore should be careful about leveling charges about presidents getting combat-happy to distract attention from other problems. Yet what is most remarkable about Gore's speech is that for all its poison, it is profoundly unserious. Take Gore's repeated characterization of the Bush policy on postwar Afghanistan as "this doctrine of wash your hands and walk away." Walk away? Our policy is to secure Kabul, retrain the army, protect the new president and establish a small central government that can, over time, expand its political and geographic reach. This is a serious commitment. Our soldiers trying to fulfill it are being shot at regularly. Tell them they're walking away.
There is a serious question about how deeply involved in Afghanistan we ought to be. Are we more likely to bring stability by continuing Afghanistan's long history of decentralization and allowing warlords to act in their traditional areas of influence, or by sending an imperial army to go around imposing order in places where outsiders - the British and the Soviets most notably - have not had much luck imposing their own order?
One can argue either way, but the burden of proof is on those urging a more onerous and risky MacArthur regency. If Gore were a serious man, he would make the case. But he doesn't. He doesn't even try to. He is too thin. And too cynical.
The New York Times reports that Gore wrote the speech "after consulting a fairly far-flung group of advisers that included Rob Reiner." The U.S. current foreign policy is the combined product of Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice, thingy Cheney, Colin Powell, Paul Wolfowitz and the president. Meanwhile, the pretender is huddling with Meathead.
Had it not been for a few little old ladies baffled by the butterfly ballot in Palm Beach, American foreign policy today would be made by Gore-Reiner instead of the Bush brain trust. Who says God doesn't smile upon the United States of America? | | | | Guest | | Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2002 6:43 am Post subject: Re: Gore Shouldn't Throw Stones at This House |
| [quote="*Mutt American"]Gore Shouldn't Throw Stones at This House
Charles Krauthammer
Charles Krauthammer is a syndicated columnist based at The Washington Post.
September 29, 2002
Krauthammer is an ardent zionist and has no credibility with anyone objectively looking at the palestinian resistance against the brutal israeli occupation on palestinian land... | | | | Guest | | Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2002 6:54 am Post subject: Re: Wake up call |
| | We wrote: | http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/signs.htm
New! September 29, 2002 - One of the great unsolved mysteries of the
period leading up to 9/11 is the extent of
an Israeli spy operation in the US
uncovered by Carl Cameron of Fox News and
widely reported, including in this
space . As we all know, everybody spies on
everybody, “friends” and foes alike.
But this operation is believed to have been
so extensive, and wide-ranging, that
the real question in regard to Israeli
foreknowledge of 9/11 is, as one US federal
agent put it to Cameron, “How could they
not have known?” Now, however, more
evidence of the Israeli connection is
emerging...
Both Israeli and US government officials
scoffed at these charges as an “urban
myth.” Their denials, however, were
somewhat undermined by the leaking of the
US government’s own report on “suspicious
activities” by Israelis around US
government offices and military
installations. The report, culled from information
supplied by numerous federal agencies,
documents what is obviously a
large-scale intelligence operation directed
against US government facilities. Now
more documentary evidence of the Israeli
connection to 9/11 comes with the
emergence of the US government’s own list
of terrorist suspects, two versions of
which Cryptome.com has obtained and posted,
with the following information as
to their provenance: [one list] has a number of American names as
well, one Frenchman, and — lo and behold! — there
is our old friend Dominik Suter, listed right between Eyad Suleiman,
a native of Kuwait, and Sheikh Amed Salim Swedan, a
Kenyan.
Suter, you’ll remember, is the fellow behind the mysterious Urban
Moving Systems, whose employees were arrested after
neighbors reported them laughing and cheering as they watched the
World Trade Center burn. These five “Middle
Eastern-looking men,” as described by witnesses, were Israelis: they
were found with box cutters in their van, $4,000 in
cash, and multiple passports. Police interrogated them for hours, and
transferred them to a maximum security facility,
where they were held for months. Their van was registered as the
property of Urban Moving Systems: A raid on the
Urban Moving Systems warehouse yielded computers, documents, and
other evidence — of what, we don’t know. Suter,
the owner of the company, refused all comment, and soon fled the
country — to Israel.
The inclusion of Suter, an Israeli, and the front man for what even
the Forward acknowledges was a Mossad operation,
on an official list of terrorist suspects should silence, for good,
those who dismiss the Israeli connection to 9/11 as a
“myth,” urban or otherwise. [...] On that list, along with Mohammed
Atta , and Zacarias Moussaoui, is not only Suter,
but also five other Americans — or, at least, non-Arabs with US
addresses. What’s up with that?
Only God, and the higher echelons of the US government, know for
sure. What we do know is this: it is no longer
possible to deny that the US government believes Israel had some
connection to the events leading up to 9/11. The
documentary evidence, along with the reported testimony of patriots
within law enforcement, is accumulating to the
point where it can no longer be ignored. Just how far does Israeli
malevolence go? I’m afraid we’re about to find out...
Comment: The fact that the above documents and ideas are once again
being "leaked" suggests to us that there are
some crosses and double crosses in the hallowed halls of government
that will be "gradually revealed."
As we have said before, and will say again, the Ultimate Objective of
the US Consortium, demonstrated by the reams of
evidence, is to destroy ALL Semites - Arabs and Jews together. This
has been the agenda since the turn of the 19th
century. It was the agenda behind the American funding of eugenics
and Hitler. It was the agenda behind the formation
of the state of Israel as a place to gather all Jews together to make
it easier to destroy them. It is the agenda behind
the pretended "friendship" of the US and Britain with Israel. It is
the agenda behind their manipulations of Mossad to plan
and execute the 9-11 attacks using mind controlled Arab pilots as
patsies. It is the reason that there is so much
evidence that the CIA, FBI, and other alphabet soup guys knew what
was going on, but did nothing. It is the reason
that Bush knew what was coming down, and did nothing. Mossad and
Israel were falling right in line with the plans for
the Final Solution.
Now and again, the facade slips, and those who pretend to be the
friends of Jews are seen showing their true colors. A
recent example is a series of remarks made by Billy Graham to Richard
Nixon, revealed when 500 hours of Nixon tapes
were released by the National Archives. Most were recorded between
January and June 1972, but I can assure you, the
attitudes behind closed doors in government have not changed even if
the tactics have.
In the conversation with Nixon, the Southern Baptist evangelist
expressed disdain for what he saw as Jewish domination
of the media. "This stranglehold has got to be broken or this
country's going down the drain," Graham said, agreeing with
Nixon's own comments earlier in the conversation. "You believe that?"
Nixon says in response. "Yes, sir," says Graham.
"Oh boy. So do I," Nixon agrees, then says: "I can't ever say that
but I believe it." "No, but if you get elected a second
time, then we might be able to do something," Graham says, reassuring
the president.
Just keep in mind that Nixon was pardoned by Ford, and George Bush I
was appointed director of the CIA by Ford. I
seriously doubt that the opinions of these guys have changed a bit.
But they are now, oh so cleverly, using the Jews'
own control of the Media to set Israel up for total destruction. And
how easily and gleefully the Jews are taking the bait.
Their priests have fed them so long with the lies that they are
"chosen" and that Israel is theirs by right, that it's easy
to make them hate their close kin, the Palestinians and its
pathetically simple to dangle the carrot of "we'll help you get
rid of those nasty Palestinians if you'll help us with Media spin
control." And so, the Devil's bargain is struck.
According to a biography of Richard Nixon, his close personal and
political ties with the Bush family go back
to 1941 when Nixon claims he read an ad in an L A. newspaper,
placed by a wealthy group of businessmen,
led by Preston Bush, the father of George Bush. They wanted a
young, malleable candidate to run for
Congress. Nixon applied for the position and won the job. Nixon
became a mouthpiece for the Bush group.
(Source: Freedom Magazine, 1986, L.F. Prouty).
In fact, Preston Bush is credited with creating the winning
ticket of Eisenhower-Nixon in 1952.(Source:
George Bush, F. Green, Hipocrene, 1988).
The reason why Bush will "do anything" is because his hands have
as much of Kennedy's blood on them as do
Nixon's, Hunt's, Sturgis's, Felix Rodriguez's and Gerald Ford's.
This White House gang fears that if the public
ever realizes how they shot their way into power it could set off
a spark that would destroy their fragile
fraud and land them in jail.
The following commentary from the Jordan Star raises questions about
the "Christian Zionist" pact. What the writer does
not realize is the level of deception of those in power manipulating
Christians to support Israeli agendas, all the while
they are holding their own opinions exactly as those expressed in
private by Billy Graham and Richard Nixon - caught on
tape - a rare peek inside the minds of the Conspirators. When the
author says "Politics makes strange bedfellows," I
don't think he realized that the Jews are sleeping with the enemy.
It is said politics often makes strange bedfellows, but nothing
could be more perverse than the growing
partnership between American Jews and Christian Zionists in
support of Israel. While the pro-Israeli lobby has
long been successful in subverting US interests for the sake of
Israel, the growing influence of Christian
Zionism over United States foreign policy in the Middle East
represents a dangerous trend in American
politics. [...] The efforts of Christian Zionists to manipulate
current policy-making adds a disturbing dimension
to an already biased and unfair US foreign policy for the Middle
East.
n the days following the attacks, fundamentalist Christian
leaders like Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson
compared the attacks on the United States to Palestinian attacks
against Israeli occupation. Despite the
fact that no comparison can be made between those who attacked
the United States and legitimate
Palestinian resistance against Israelis occupation of Palestinian
lands, Christian Zionists have succeeded in
linking the two in the eyes of many in the US Congress and the
Bush administration. To make matters worse,
Christian Zionists have joined forces with the pro-Israeli lobby
in demonizing the Muslim world and supporting
Israel's brutal campaign against the Palestinian people.
Christian Zionists across the US are raising millions to
benefit Israel, and they are also engaged in a well-orchestrated
public relations campaign to distort American
perceptions regarding the current Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Christian Zionists have strong ties with the Republican
leadership in the American Congress, and recent
statements by Republican leaders on Capitol Hill reflect their
power and prestige. Recently, House Majority
Whip Tom Delay of Texas told AIPAC's policy conference the West
Bank and Golan Heights weren't occupied
territories but part of Israel. House Republican Majority Leader
Dick Armey (R-TX) went even further calling
for the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from the Occupied
Territories on MSNBC's high-rated program Hardball
with Chris Matthews. [...]
More:
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/signs.htm |
Excellent post as we very much appreciate you making it... Like with the intentional and brutal Israeli attack on the USS Liberty (http://www.ussliberty.org), the actual truth is being made known despite the rabid censoring of pro-israel (zionist) truth distorting spinners... | | | | Guest | | Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2002 11:04 pm Post subject: Bush signs bill which calls Jerusalem capital |
| Subj: Bush signs bill which calls Jerusalem capital
Date: 9/30/02 2:23:55 PM Pacific Daylight Time
From: BGJDAVID
There is no doubt now that George W. Bush is the first Jewish president. I am just so sorry that I ever voted for him. I would've never believed he would give in to all the Jewish pressures as he has. He has been one big disappointment.
Bush signs bill which calls Jerusalem capital
By Jonathan Wright
WASHINGTON, Sept 30 (Reuters) - U.S. President George W. Bush, at the risk of angering the Arab and Muslim worlds, on Monday signed legislation that requires the administration to identify Jerusalem as Israel's capital, a U.S. official said.
Faced with a choice between endorsing the controversial legislation passed by Congress and shutting down U.S. diplomatic activity, Bush put his name to the Foreign Relations Authorization Act for 2003, which gives the administration more than $4 billion for running the State Department.
The White House, in a statement later, will argue that the language on Jerusalem reflects a "sense of the Congress" and is not binding for U.S. policy, a senior official said.
The bill goes further on Jerusalem than previously demanded by Congress, which for years has pressed successive administrations on the related question of moving the U.S. Embassy to Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.
Administrations have promised to make the move but have repeatedly put it off because of the ill feeling it would create in the Arab world, which considers Arab East Jerusalem to be occupied territory and the capital of a future Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza.
U.S. State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said on Monday the United States continues to believe that the status of Jerusalem should be decided in "permanent status" talks between Israelis and Palestinians.
"We have always opposed legislative action that hinders the president's prerogatives in advancing our interests in the region and promoting a just and lasting peace," he added.
CAPTURED IN 1967
Israel captured the eastern part of the city in the 1967 war and later annexed it. Israeli governments have said the whole city is Israel's eternal capital.
The new legislation, passed last week, does not go beyond previous calls on the administration to start immediately the process of moving the embassy to Jerusalem.
But it adds three mandatory provisions which change the way the United States treats the city.
Firstly, it says that the administration cannot spend money on the U.S. consulate in Jerusalem unless the consulate is under the supervision of the U.S. ambassador to Israel. The U.S. consul general in Jerusalem, who deals mainly with Palestinians, now reports directly to the State Department.
Secondly, any U.S. government document which lists countries and their capitals will have to identify Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
Thirdly, in official U.S. documents such as passports, birth certificates and nationality certifications, U.S. citizens born in Jerusalem may insist that the documents record their place of birth as Israel.
The Arab American Institute wrote to Bush on Friday urging him to veto the bill, on the grounds that it overturns existing U.S. policy and presidential authority.
"At a time when you are building a coalition to support our goals in the Middle East, Congress should not be undermining your efforts," said George Salem, chairman of the institute.
"If made into law, (it) will further inflame and deepen resentment among Arabs and Arab countries toward the United States," added the institute's president, James Zogby.
SMALL PART OF BIG BILL
In theory, President Bush could have vetoed the bill but the provisions on Jerusalem are only a small part of a piece of legislation which covers the whole world and gives the administration the money it need to run diplomacy.
The legislation also withholds $10 million in aid allocated to Lebanon in 2003 until the Lebanese army deploys to the Israeli-Lebanese border and the Lebanese government asserts its authority in the area where the army deploys.
Boucher said the Bush administration had also opposed this part of the legislation. "Those kinds of provisions are not helpful," he told a daily briefing."
After Israel withdrew from southern Lebanon in 2000, the Lebanese army did not take over all the territory, giving some freedom of action to the guerrilla group Hizbollah.
Israel wants the Lebanese army to deploy south to the border and restrain Hizbollah, which often exchanges fire with Israeli positions in the disputed Shebaa Farms area, at the juncture of Syria, Lebanon and Israel.
The total amount of U.S. aid planned for Lebanon in 2003 was not immediately available.
09/30/02 17:08 ET | | | | *Mutt American | | Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2002 3:21 am Post subject: |
| | Excellent. It's about time Bush took a solid stand re Israel. | | | | Guest | | Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2002 6:26 am Post subject: Zionist US Congressman Tom Lantos with "Israel First&qu |
| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=214159
Last update - 02:12 30/09/2002
They're jumping in head first
By Akiva Eldar
"My dear Colette, don't worry," said Tom Lantos, the California congressman, as he tried to calm MK Colette Avital of the Labor Party, who was visiting Capitol Hill last week as part of a delegation of the Peace Coalition. "You won't have any problem with Saddam," the Jewish congressman continued. "We'll be rid of the bastard soon enough. And in his place we'll install a pro-Western dictator, who will be good for us and for you."
Lantos explained to his guest from Israel that there's no lack of Iraqi opposition figures in exile, but until they learn how to run a state, "we'll be there." According to Lantos that interim period, with an American-sponsored dictator in power, should last between five to six years.
Avital says she asked how one can talk about a dictator in Iraq and at the same time demand "democratic reforms" in the territories as a precondition for renewing the peace process. Lantos said that democratization in the territories is just a general "road map." He reminded her that "the U.S. didn't turn into a democracy overnight." In any case, he promised her that after America gets rid of all the regimes of evil, it will go straight to Syria, "and tell young Assad that's what will happen to him if he doesn't stop supporting terrorism."
It's important to emphasize that Lantos is not a Bush administration spokesman, and not even part of the Republican leadership. The 11-term congressman is the leader of the Democratic Party caucus in the House of Representatives' International Affairs Committee. His approach, which says an agreement with the Palestinians can wait, like his party's support for semi-lunatic anti-Palestinian legislation, eases the work of the Middle East experts in the State Department.
The expectation that as soon as Bush gets rid of Saddam Hussein he'll show the same determination to advance a peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians - as his people are constantly whispering to Bush's Arab friends - has as much chance of fulfillment as the hope that Sharon will withdraw from the territories after getting rid of Arafat. As Lantos says, in the best case, which means the war ends with a "new order" in Iraq, there's a long line of terrorists after Saddam. In the worst case, meaning the war destabilizes Iraq, and perhaps the entire region, the U.S. will be bogged down for the coming years in a Vietnam-like morass.
Unfortunately, Palestinian suicide bombers will presumably continue to keep Israelis atop the list of terror victims around the world, thereby keeping the issue of the occupation and the settlements, let alone tens of thousands of hungry Palestinian children, off the international agenda. All those issues will have to wait at least until Bush finishes his "war on terror."
Then, sometime in the first part of the second half of his first term in office, like all presidents, he'll begin thinking about the coming elections and Jewish donors. Bush has memories from his father's experience, about how a conflict between the president and a right-wing government in Israel can affect an American president's career.
Apparently, the administration doesn't have a clue what will happen the morning after Saddam is gone. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, asked over the weekend if he can guarantee the next government in Iraq will be preferable to Saddam's said frankly, "there aren't many guarantees in life." In other words, the deluge is ahead of us and we're jumping in head first. That's precisely how Sharon behaves, as well. First we'll get rid of Arafat and break up the Palestinian Authority and then, well, God is great.
There's nothing new with Sharon, other than the fact that while as housing minster he greeted every American peace envoy visiting the region with new settlements, and now he greets every Palestinian initiative for a cease-fire with an attack on the heart of Gaza, and puts a siege on the Muqata just as the closest thing to a coup d'etat starts against Arafat. As far as he's concerned, and for that matter, Chief of Staff Moshe Ya'alon is concerned, "the democratic reforms" are just a euphemism for erasing any trace of Oslo and getting rid of all those who represent it.
It is very difficult to understand how Oslo architect Shimon Peres, and Benjamin Ben-Eliezer, who formally adopted the Saudi peace plan, lend their support to this policy. Now the leaders of Colette Avital's party, she of the the Peace Coalition, will pat themselves on the back and explain that because they stayed in the government, a crisis in relations with the U.S. was avoided. It's hard to believe they aren't aware of the fear that keeps some of the highest ranking security officers awake at night: that on the morning after the last remnants of the central authority in the territories has been erased - and they are active participants in its erasure - we can expect a flood of terrorism. And we won't even have anyone left to besiege.
_________________
FREE PALESTINE FROM CRUEL ISRAELI OCCUPATION | | | | Guest | | | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |
