| Author | Message | | Guest | | Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2002 10:39 pm Post subject: ISRAELI TROOPS FIRE ON U.N. DELEGATION IN GAZA REUTERS |
| Subj: ISRAELI TROOPS FIRE ON U.N. DELEGATION IN GAZA Reuters, 9/18/02
Date:9/18/02 12:10:44 PM Pacific Daylight Time
From: beverly
This is exactly where we were when they fired on us...................
ISRAELI TROOPS FIRE ON U.N. DELEGATION IN GAZA
Reuters, 9/18/02
RAFAH, Gaza Strip (Reuters) - A delegation of United Nations officials came
under fire from Israeli troops as they toured Rafah refugee camp in the
southern Gaza Strip on Wednesday, forcing them to take cover.
A Reuters correspondent accompanying the U.N. delegation said no one was
hurt in the firing by troops guarding the border fence with Egypt.
The Israeli army did not immediately comment on the shooting.
Peter Hansen, commissioner-general of the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for
Palestinian refugees (UNRWA), was standing at the time on the rubble of
Palestinian houses destroyed in Israeli military raids.
The group was in Rafah to hand over 97 houses to people left homeless by
army demolitions.
Israel regularly demolishes homes in the area in what it says is punishment
for attacks on its troops and on Jewish settlements in the almost
two-year-old Palestinian uprising against Israeli occupation.
bev,
that is incredible arrogance... i think israel is trying to undermine the un via the usa so it doesn't have to end up abiding by the various un security council resolutions that it has violated for years like 242 and 338... look at the following for all the un security council resolutions that israel has defied (israel attacked the uss liberty in order to prevent the usa from confirming the invasion of the golan in syria in 1967):
PMWATCH -- September 17, 2002 -- Are you tired of straight-faced expressions of outrage and indignation over Iraqi violations of UN resolutions, trampeling on the human rights of civilians, aggression against neighbor states -- all without mention of the one state that stands accused and convicted of each of thoses violations on a much more massive scale, Israel?
Don't let the media play this bit of double-talk straight: point to the big white elephant in the room and let them know that this kind of mindless propaganda is not working, at least not on you.
For a list of UN resolutions against Israel and Iraq, see below.
For sending a note to letters, use: http://www.pmwatch.org/pmw/emailfax/sendemail.asp
You can also give a call to your favorite paper or media outlet at: http://www.pmwatch.org/pmw/contact/media.html
Iraq:
UN Resolutions violated, ignored: 16
Countries attacked, invaded, violated: Iran, Kuwait
Countries occupied for years: NONE
Countries currently occupying: NONE
Territory illegally annexed: NONE
Wars started: 1980, 1990
Possesses weapons of mass destruction: To be determined
Possesses nuclear weapons: No
Most notable atrocity against civilians: 5,000 Kurdish civilians were killed in the village of Halabja, March 1988
Currently under a regime of UN sanctions: Yes
Israel:
UN Resolutions violated, ignored: 68
Countries attacked, invaded, violated: Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Tunisia
Countries occupied for years: Egypt, Lebanon, Syria
Countries currently occupying: Syria
Territory illegally annexed: Golan Heights, Jerusalem, Palestinian Territories
Wars started: 1956, 1967, 1982
Possesses weapons of mass destruction: Yes
Possesses nuclear weapons: Yes
Most notable atrocity against civilians: 17,500 Lebanese civilians killed in 1982 invasion of Lebanon
Currently under a regime of UN sanctions: No
UN Resolutions pertaining to Iraq:
UNSCR 678 - November 29, 1990
UNSCR 686 - March 2, 1991
UNSCR 687 - April 3, 1991
UNSCR 688 - April 5, 1991
UNSCR 707 - August 15, 1991
UNSCR 715 - October 11, 1991
UNSCR 949 - October 15, 1994
UNSCR 1051 - March 27, 1996
UNSCR 1060 - June 12, 1996
UNSCR 1115 - June 21, 1997
UNSCR 1134 - October 23, 1997
UNSCR 1137 - November 12, 1997
UNSCR 1154 - March 2, 1998
UNSCR 1194 - September 9, 1998
UNSCR 1205 - November 5, 1998
UNSCR 1284 - December 17, 1999
UN Resolutions pertaining to Israel:
SC Resolution 42 (1948) of 5 March 1948 [Adopted at 263rd meeting (8-0-3) (3 abstentions were Argentina, Syria, United Kingdom)]
SC Resolution 43 (1948) of 1 April 1948 [Adopted at 277th meeting - unanimously]
SC Resolution 44 (1948) of 1 April 1948 [Adopted at 277th meeting (9-0-2) (2 abstentions were Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, U.S.S.R.)]
SC Resolution 46 (1948) of 17 April 1948 [Adopted at 283rd meeting (9-0-2) (2 abstentions were Ukrainian S.S.R., U.S.S.R.)]
SC Resolution 48 (1948) of 23 April 1948 [Adopted at 287th meeting (8-0-3) (3 abstentions were Colombia, Ukrainian S.S.R., U.S.S.R.)]
SC Resolution 49 (1948) of 22 May 1948 [Adopted at 302nd meeting (8-0-3) (3 abstentions were Syria, Ukrainian S.S.R., U.S.S.R.)]
SC Resolution 50 (1948) of 29 May 1948 [Adopted at 310th meeting (Draft was voted on in parts, no vote taken on text as a whole.)]
SC Resolution 53 (1948) of 7 July 1948 [Adopted at 331st meeting (8-0-3) (3 abstentions were Syria, Ukrainian S.S.R., U.S.S.R.)]
SC Resolution 54 (1948) of 15 July 1948 [Adopted at 338th meeting (7-1-3) (1 against was Syria, 3 abstentions were Argentina, Ukrainian S.S.R., U.S.S.R.)]
SC Resolution 56 (1948) of 19 August 1948 [Adopted at 354th meeting (Draft was voted on in parts, no vote taken on the text as a whole.)]
SC Resolution 57 (1948) of 18 September 1948 [Adopted at 358th meeting-unanimously]
SC Resolution 59 (1948) of 19 October 1948 [Adopted at 367th meeting -unanimously]
SC Resolution 60 (1948) of 29 October 1948 [Adopted at 375th meeting (without a vote)]
SC Resolution 61 (1948) of 4 November 1948 [Adopted at 377th meeting (9-1-1) (1 against was Ukrainian S.S.R.; 1 abstention was U.S.S.R.)]
SC Resolution 62 (1948) of 16 November 1948 [Adopted at 381st meeting (Draft was voted on in parts, no vote taken on the text as a whole.)]
SC Resolution 66 (1948) of 29 December 1948 [Adopted at 396th meeting (8-0-3) (3 abstentions were Ukrainian S.S.R., U.S.S.R., U.S.)]
SC Resolution 69 (1949) of 4 March 1949 [Adopted at 414th meeting (9-1-1) (1 against was Egypt, 1 abstention was U.K.)]
SC Resolution 72 (1949) of 11 August 1949 [Adopted at 437th meeting (without vote)]
SC Resolution 73 (1949) of 11 August 1949 [Adopted at 437th meeting (9-0-2) (2 abstentions were Ukrainian S.S.R., U.S.S.R.)]
SC Resolution 101 (1953) of 24 November 1953 [Adopted at 642nd meeting (9-0-2) (2 abstentions were Lebanon, U.S.S.R.)]
SC Resolution 89 (1950) of 17 November 1950 [Adopted at 524th meeting (10-0-2) (2 abstentions were Egypt, U.S.S.R.)]
SC Resolution 119 (1956) of 31 October 1956 [Adopted at 751st meeting (7-2-2) (2 against were France, U.K., 2 abstentions were Australia, Belgium)]
SC Resolution 127 (1958) of 22 January 1958 [Adopted at 810th meeting - unanimously]
SC Resolution 162 (1961) of 11 April 1961 [Adopted at 949th meeting (8-0-3) (3 abstentions were Ceylon, U.S.S.R., United Arab Republic)
SC Resolution 228 (1966) of 25 November 1966 [Adopted at 1328th meeting (14-01) (1 abstention was New Zealand)]
SC Resolution 233 (1967) of 6 June 1967 [Adopted at 1348th meeting - unanimously]
SC Resolution 234 (1967) of 7 June 1967 [Adopted at 1350th meeting - unanimously]
SC Resolution 237 (1967) of 14 June 1967 [Adopted at 1361st meeting - unanimously]
SC Resolution 242 (1967) of 22 November 1967 [Adopted 1382nd meeting -unanimously]
SC Resolution 248 (1968) of 24 March 1968 [Adopted at 1407th meeting - unanimously]
SC Resolution 250 (1968) of 27 April 1968 [Adopted at 1417th meeting - unanimously]
SC Resolution No. 251 (1968) of 2 May 1968 [Adopted at 1420th meeting - unanimously]
SC Resolution No. 252 (1968) of 21 May 1968 [Adopted at 1426th meeting (13-0-2) (2 abstentions were Canada, U.S.)]
SC Resolution 259 (1968) of 27 September 1968 [Adopted at 1454th meeting (12-0-3) (3 abstentions were Canada, Denmark, U.S.)]
SC Resolution 267 (1969) of 3 July 1969 [Adopted at 1485th meeting - unanimously]
SC Resolution 271 (1969) of 15 September 1969 [Adopted at 1512th meeting (11-0-4) (4 abstentions were Colombia, Finland, Paraguay, U.S.)]
37. SC Resolution 298 (1971) of 25 September 1971 [Adopted at 1582nd meeting (14-0-1)(1 abstention was Syria)]
SC Resolution 331 (1973) of 20 April 1973 [Adopted at 1710th meeting - unanimously]
SC Resolution 338 (1973) of 22 October 1973 [Adopted at 1747th meeting-unanimously]
SC Resolution 339 (1973) of 23 October 1973 [Adopted at 1748th meeting (14-0-0) (China did not vote)]
SC Resolution 344 (1973) of 15 December 1973 [Adopted at 1760th meeting (10-0-4) (4 abstentions were France, U.S.S.R., U.K., U.S.)]
SC Resolution 381 (1975) of 30 November 1975 [Adopted at 1856th meeting (13-0-0) (China and Iraq did not vote)]
SC Resolution 425 (1978) of 19 March 1978 [Adopted at 2074th meeting (12-0-2) (2 abstentions were Czechoslovakia and U.S.S.R., China did not participate in the voting)]
SC Resolution 446 (1979) of 22 March 1979 [Adopted at 2134th meeting (12-0-3) (3 abstentions were Norway, U.K., U.S.)]
SC Resolution 452 (1979) of 20 July 1979 [Adopted at 2159th meeting (14-0-1) (1 abstention was U.S.)]
46. SC Resolution 465 (1980) of 1 March 1980 [Adopted at 2203rd meeting - unanimously]
SC Resolution 468 (1980) of 8 May 1980 [Adopted at 2221st meeting (14-0-1) (1 abstention was U.S.)]
SC Resolution 469 (1980) of 20 May 1980 [Adopted at 2223rd meeting (14-0-1) (1 abstention was U.S.)]
SC Resolution 471 (1980) of 5 June 1980 [Adopted at 2226th meeting (14-0-1) (1 abstention was U.S.)]
SC Resolution 476 (1980) of 30 June 1980 [Adopted at 2242nd meeting (14-0-1) (1 abstention was U.S.)]
SC Resolution 478 (1980) of 20 August 1980 [Adopted at 2245th meeting (14-0-1) (1 abstention was U.S.)]
52. SC Resolution 484 (1980) of 19 December 1980 [Adopted 2260th meeting-unanimously]
SC Resolution 500 (1982) of 28 January 1982 [Adopted at 2330th meeting (13-0-2) (2 abstentions were U.K., U.S.)]
SC Resolution 508 (1982) of 5 June 1982 [Adopted at 2374th meeting -unanimously]
SC Resolution 509 (1982) of 6 June 1982 [Adopted at 2375th meeting - unanimously]
SC Resolution 512 (1982) of 19 June 1982 [Adopted at 2380th meeting - unanimously]
SC Resolution 513 (1982) of 4 July 1982 [Adopted at 2382nd meeting - unanimously]
SC Resolution 515 (1982) of 29 July 1982 [Adopted at 2385th meeting (14-0-0) (U.S. did not participate in the vote.)]
SC Resolution 516 (1982) of 1 August 1982 [Adopted at 2386th meeting - unanimously]
SC Resolution 517 (1982) of 4 August 1982 [Adopted at 2389th meeting (14-0-1) (1 abstention was U.S.)]
SC Resolution 518 (1982) of 12 August 1982 [Adopted at 2392nd meeting - unanimously]
SC Resolution 520 (1982) of 17 September 1982 [Adopted at 2395th meeting - unanimously]
SC Resolution 521 (1982) of 19 September 1982 [Adopted 2396th meeting-unanimously]
SC Resolution 573 (1985) of 4 October 1985 [Adopted at 2615th meeting (14-0-1) (1 abstention was U.S.)
SC Resolution 592 (1986) of 8 December 1986 [Adopted at 2727th meeting (14-0-1) (1 abstention was U.S.)]
SC Resolution 605 (1987) of 22 December 1987 [Adopted at 2777th meeting (14-0-1) (1 abstention was U.S.)]
SC Resolution 607 (1988) of 5 January 1988 [Adopted at 2780th meeting - unanimously]
SC Resolution 608 (1988) of 14 January 1988 [Adopted at 2781st meeting (14-0-1) (1 abstention was U.S.)]
SC Resolution 611 (1988) of 25 April 1988 [Adopted at 2810th meeting (14-0-1) (1 abstention was U.S.)]
SC Resolution 636 (1989) of 6 July 1989 [Adopted at 2870th meeting (14-0-1) (1 abstention was U.S.)]
SC Resolution 641 (1989) of 30 August 1989 [Adopted at 2883rd meeting (14-0-1) (1 abstention was U.S.)]
SC Resolution 672 (1990) of 12 October 1990 [Adopted at 2948th meeting-unanimously]
SC Resolution 673 (1990) of 24 October 1990 [Adopted at 2949th meeting-unanimously]
SC Resolution 681 (1990) of 20 December 1990 [Adopted at 2970th meeting -unanimously]
SC Resolution 694 (1991) of 24 May 1991 [Adopted at 2989th meeting - unanimously]
SC Resolution 726 (1992) of 6 January 1992 [Adopted at 3026th meeting - unanimously]
SC Resolution 799 (1992) of 18 December 1992 [Adopted at 3151st meeting-unanimously]
SC Resolution 904 (1994) of 18 March 1994 [Adopted at 3351st meeting - unanimously (Draft was voted on in parts, with the U.S. abstaining on two preambular paragraphs. No vote was taken on the text as a whole.)]
SC Resolution 1073 (1996) of 28 September 1996 [Adopted at 3698th meeting (14-0-1) (1 abstention was U.S.)]
SC Resolution 1322 (2000) of 7 October 2000 Adopted at 4205th meeting (14-0-1) (1 abstention was U.S.)]
Resolution <1397> (2002) of 12 March 2002 [Adopted at # th meeting (14-0-1) (1 abstention was the Syrian Arab Republic)]
Resolution 1402 (2002) of 30 March 2002 [Adopted at 4503 rd meeting (14-0-1) (1 abstention was the Syrian Arab Republic)]
Resolution 1403 (2002) of 4 April 2002 [Adopted at 4506 th meeting-unanimously]
Resolution 1405 (2002) of 19 April 2002 [Adopted at 4516th meeting-unanimously]
In a message dated 9/17/02 8:58:17 PM, MejiaRANGER8221 writes:
Congressman Ron Paul
U.S. House of Representatives
September 10, 2002
QUESTIONS THAT WON'T BE ASKED ABOUT IRAQ
Soon we hope to have hearings on the pending war with Iraq. I am concerned there are some questions that won’t be asked- and maybe will not even be allowed to be asked. Here are some questions I would like answered by those who are urging us to start this war.
1. Is it not true that the reason we did not bomb the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War was because we knew they could retaliate?
2. Is it not also true that we are willing to bomb Iraq now because we know it cannot retaliate- which just confirms that there is no real threat?
3. Is it not true that those who argue that even with inspections we cannot be sure that Hussein might be hiding weapons, at the same time imply that we can be more sure that weapons exist in the absence of inspections?
4. Is it not true that the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency was able to com-
plete its yearly verification mission to Iraq just this year with Iraqi cooperation?
5. Is it not true that the intelligence community has been unable to develop a case tying Iraq to global terrorism at all, much less the attacks on the United States last year? Does anyone remember that 15 of the 19 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia and that none came from Iraq?
6. Was former CIA counter-terrorism chief Vincent Cannistraro wrong when he recent
ly said there is no confirmed evidence of Iraq’s links to terrorism?
7. Is it not true that the CIA has concluded there is no evidence that a Prague meet-
ing between 9/11 hijacker Atta and Iraqi intelligence took place?
8. Is it not true that northern Iraq, where the administration claimed al-Qaeda were hiding out, is in the control of our "allies," the Kurds?
9. Is it not true that the vast majority of al-Qaeda leaders who escaped appear to have safely made their way to Pakistan, another of our so-called allies?
10. Has anyone noticed that Afghanistan is rapidly sinking into total chaos, with bombings and assassinations becoming daily occurrences; and that according to a recent UN report the al-Qaeda "is, by all accounts, alive and well and poised to strike again, how, when, and where it chooses"
11. Why are we taking precious military and intelligence resources away from track-
ing down those who did attack the United States- and who may again attack the United States- and using them to invade countries that have not attacked the United States?
12. Would an attack on Iraq not just confirm the Arab world's worst suspicions about the US- and isn't this what bin Laden wanted?
13. How can Hussein be compared to Hitler when he has no navy or air force, and now has an army 1/5 the size of twelve years ago, which even then proved totally inept at defending the country?
14. Is it not true that the constitutional power to declare war is exclusively that of the Congress? Should presidents, contrary to the Constitution, allow Congress to concur only when pressured by public opinion? Are presidents permitted to rely on the UN for permission to go to war?
15. Are you aware of a Pentagon report studying charges that thousands of Kurds in one village were gassed by the Iraqis, which found no conclusive evidence that Iraq was responsible, that Iran occupied the very city involved, and that evidence indic-
ated the type of gas used was more likely controlled by Iran not Iraq?
16. Is it not true that anywhere between 100,000 and 300,000 US soldiers have suff-
ered from Persian Gulf War syndrome from the first Gulf War, and that thousands may have died?
17. Are we prepared for possibly thousands of American casualties in a war against a country that does not have the capacity to attack the United States?
18. Are we willing to bear the economic burden of a 100 billion dollar war against Iraq, with oil prices expected to skyrocket and further rattle an already shaky Am-
erican economy? How about an estimated 30 years occupation of Iraq that some have deemed necessary to "build democracy" there?
19. Iraq’s alleged violations of UN resolutions are given as reason to initiate an att-
ack, yet is it not true that hundreds of UN Resolutions have been ignored by various countries without penalty?
20. Did former President Bush not cite the UN Resolution of 1990 as the reason he could not march into Baghdad, while supporters of a new attack assert that it is the very reason we can march into Baghdad?
21. Is it not true that, contrary to current claims, the no-fly zones were set up by Brit
ain and the United States without specific approval from the United Nations?
22. If we claim membership in the international community and conform to its rules only when it pleases us, does this not serve to undermine our position, directing animosity toward us by both friend and foe?
23. How can our declared goal of bringing democracy to Iraq be believable when we prop up dictators throughout the Middle East and support military tyrants like Mush
araf in Pakistan, who overthrew a democratically-elected president?
24. Are you familiar with the 1994 Senate Hearings that revealed the U.S. knowingly supplied chemical and biological materials to Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war and as late as 1992- including after the alleged Iraqi gas attack on a Kurdish village?
25. Did we not assist Saddam Hussein’s rise to power by supporting and encourag-
ing his invasion of Iran? Is it honest to criticize Saddam now for his invasion of Iran, which at the time we actively supported?
26. Is it not true that preventive war is synonymous with an act of aggression, and has never been considered a moral or legitimate US policy?
27. Why do the oil company executives strongly support this war if oil is not the real reason we plan to take over Iraq?
28. Why is it that those who never wore a uniform and are confident that they won’t have to personally fight this war are more anxious for this war than our generals?
29. What is the moral argument for attacking a nation that has not initiated aggress-ion against us, and could not if it wanted?
30. Where does the Constitution grant us permission to wage war for any reason other than self-defense?
31. Is it not true that a war against Iraq rejects the sentiments of the time-honored Treaty of Westphalia, nearly 400 years ago, that countries should never go into ano-
ther for the purpose of regime change?
32. Is it not true that the more civilized a society is, the less likely disagreements will be settled by war?
33. Is it not true that since World War II Congress has not declared war and- not coincidentally- we have not since then had a clear-cut victory?
34. Is it not true that Pakistan, especially through its intelligence services, was an active supporter and key organizer of the Taliban?
35. Why don't those who want war bring a formal declaration of war resolution to the floor of Congress?
In a message dated 9/18/02 8:05:23 AM Pacific Daylight Time, msteffan1@tiscali.co.uk writes:
Subj:Ritter
Date:9/18/02 8:05:23 AM Pacific Daylight Time
From:msteffan1
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2002/09/17/writt17.xml/
Got my ear anyway.
thanks for sending that through to me, tom.. iraq needs to flood baghdad with thousands of foreign nationals pursuing peace in order to potentially prevent the usa from attacking along with its british poodle (and i am british as well as american as you already know). i completely agree with what ritter mentioned via that telegraph article.. i don't usually access the web site for the telegraph newspaper in the uk (i mostly access the independent newspaper via www.independent.co.uk with robert fisk and company and the www.guardian.co.uk for the guardian newspaper as well). what is that article about when it mentions that ritter is a symbol of hate in the usa as ritter is a genuine american patriot to many americans and is hardly a symbol of hate (or whatever that article negatively referred to him as).
however, i am sure the zionists and their lackeys driving the us to attack iraq for israel hate him though (like the zionists in that jewish jinsa group which is driving our middle east foreign policy in the pentagon and state department as well). more about jinsa is mentioned via the links provided below:
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2002/09/18/jewish-jinsa-driving-us-invasion-of-iraq.php
Forwarded:
Zionist cronies of President Bush are driving us to invade Iraq as you can read by accessing the following web link (by sure to read the article about the Jewish JINSA group which Cheney was associated with as JINSA is pushing for an attack on Iraq, and Cheney is pushing hard for our pro-Israel lobby-corrupted and Zionist-occupied Congress to quickly pass a resolution to give him permission to invade Iraq in accordance with what JINSA wants for Israel as America's best interest is not being served by inflaming the Middle East in the process:
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2002/09/16/zionist-chickenhawks-reshape-mid-east-along-us-israeli-lines.php
Just like Scott Ritter has called for us to do, contact your Congressional representative via the following link (to demand that we NOT invade IRAQ just because JINSA is driving us to for Israel):
http://www.congress.gov
U S role in supplying Iraq with "weapons of mass destruction"
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2002/09/17/u-s-role-in-supplying-iraq-weapons-of-mass-destruction.php
Israel should be made to accept UN weapons inspections as well for ITS NUKES AND CHEMICAL/BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS:
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2002/09/15/us-un-double-standard-when-it-comes-to-israel.php
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2002/09/11/israeli-weapons-of-mass-destruction-a-threat-to-peace.php
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2002/09/16/zionist-media-bias-in-the-usa-and-israeli-black-propaganda.php
MASSACRE REMEMBERED:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/2255902.stm
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/index.php
Scott Ritter should be very much appreciated for his courage in helping to prevent the Zionist-driven Bush administration from going forward with what is mentioned in the Guardian and UK Independent articles (by Brian Whitaker, Matthew Engel and Robert Fisk) that are referenced in the following message thread (there is a page link that you can click on at the bottom right to access the various pages after arriving reviewing the first page which I think you will find interesting):
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2002/09/16/zionist-chickenhawks-reshape-mid-east-along-us-israeli-lines.php
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2002/09/05/not-journalists-zionist-propagandists.php
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2002/09/16/israeli-weapons-of-mass-destruction-a-threat-to-peace.php
The death threats that Scott Ritter has been receiving are not a surprise after reading what Robert Fisk of the UK Independent mentions in the following article:
http://www.independent.co.uk/story.jsp?story=313235
MANY AMERICANS ARE WAKING UP TO ISRAELI TREACHERY LIKE WITH THE USS LIBERTY ATTACK IN WHICH ISRAEL MURDERED 34 SAILORS AND WOUNDED 171 MORE JUST TO STEAL EVEN MORE LAND IN THE GOLAN IN SYRIA:
http://www.ussliberty.org
Please scroll down to the bottom of the following page to find some excellent articles from the UK Independent newspaper (there are additional pages which you can access via the page link on the bottom right):
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/middle-east-and-asia/2002/09/03/the-abuse-of-history.php
legacy of ariel sharon:
http://www.independent.co.uk/story.jsp?story=54872
http://www.independent.co.uk/search.jsp?keywords=hobeika&submit=Go | |  | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |
