| Author | Message | | sharkman | | Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2002 2:15 am Post subject: conflicting comments rekindle uss liberty dispute... |
| Subj: Navy Times article
Date: 6/26/02 6:16:12 PM Pacific Daylight Time
From: JGidusko@cfl.rr.com
Sent from the Internet (Details)
This sent to crewmembers and supporters.
----------------------------------------
From the June 26 2002 issue of Navy Times:
------------------------------------------
CONFLICTING COMMENTS REKINDLE LIBERTY DISPUTE
KEY INVESTIGATORS EXPRESS BELIEF THAT ISRAEL
DELIBERATELY ATTACKED U.S. SHIP
By Bryant Jordan
Times staff writer
Thirty-five years after Israeli air and naval forces attacked a
lightly armed U.S. Navy spy ship during the Arab-Israeli Six-Day
War, the CIA director at the time and the legal counsel to the
Navy’s court of inquiry say the attack was deliberate.
"It was no accident," former CIA director Richard Helms said May
29, bucking that agency’s June 13, 1967, report that indicated the
incident could have been a mistake.
Retired Navy legal counsel Capt. Ward Boston says he and the
court’s president, the late Rear Adm. Isaac "Ike" Kidd, always
believed Israeli forces knowingly attacked the Liberty.
"I feel the Israelis knew what they were doing. They knew they
were shooting at a U.S. Navy ship," said Boston, who lives in
Coronado, Calif. "That’s the bottom line. I don’t care how they
tried to get out of it."
The attack killed 34 men and wounded 172 others, and sparked a
long-running controversy: Did Israel knowingly try to sink the
American ship or did it believe the ship was an Egyptian vessel?
Officially, the Navy exonerated Israel on June 18, 1967 — 10 days
after the attack — when the Navy court of inquiry found that
available evidence indicated the attack was a case of mistaken
identity.
THE COURT OF INQUIRY
Boston said Kidd told him he believed the attack was deliberate
and that the Israelis knew the ship was American.
That flies in the face of the findings of Kidd’s court, and also
what the author of a new book on the Liberty says Kidd told him in
interviews in the early 1990s.
A. Jay Cristol, a federal judge in Florida and retired Navy
aviator who also served in the service’s Judge Advocate General’s
Corps, is the author of the upcoming "The Liberty Incident."
"Kidd told me an entirely different story," said Cristol, whose
new book is dedicated to Kidd, who died in 1999.
Cristol said that during one interview with Kidd in December 1990,
Kidd related that when he brought the court’s report to then-Chief
of Naval Operations Adm. David Lamar McDonald, the CNO asked him,
"Ike, was it intentional?"
"Ike said, ‘No, Admiral,'" Cristol recalled.
But Boston remembers that when Kidd returned from Washington, he
said officials were not interested in hearing the truth.
"In military life, you accept the fact that if you’re told to shut
up, you shut up. We did what we were told," Boston said.
He explained that he is willing to talk now because "everyone else
is shooting their mouth off."
Boston said he does not know whether his beliefs were shared by
the other members of the court, Capts. Bert M. Atkinson Jr. and
Bernard J. Lauff.
Lauff could not be located for comment. Atkinson died in 1999.
But Boston’s statements do put him now in the camp of retired Adm.
Merlin Staring, who as a captain and staff legal officer in London
was initially told to review the court’s report.
Staring said June 3 that the report was taken from him before he
finished his review, but based on what he had seen, the evidence
did not support the contention that the attack was an accident.
Staring concedes he still has not read the entire report.
Staring, who went on to become the Navy’s top JAG officer, is now
part of a newly formed Liberty Alliance, which includes former CNO
and Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Thomas Moorer and two Marine
Medal of Honor recipients, Gen. Ray Davis and Col. Mitchell Paige.
The group wants a full congressional investigation into the attack
and is lobbying military organizations, including the Veterans of
Foreign Wars and the American Legion, hoping to garner support
among their members, said Tito Howard, the group’s executive
director.
SURVIVORS ALLEGE CONSPIRACY
Many Liberty survivors and their supporters long have maintained
that the attack was deliberate and that the Kidd report excluded
testimony from crew members that would have shown that.
Boston recalled that testimony was taken from crew members who
said the Israelis fired on life rafts when they were put into the
water.
The court’s report includes testimony indicating the shooting of
the life rafts was incidental, occurring when the ship was strafed
by Israeli jets.
Some allege Israel wanted the spy ship sunk to ensure it did not
pick up communications showing Israel was planning to seize the
Golan Heights from Syria. Others say it was to prevent Liberty
from intercepting communications dealing with an alleged Israeli
massacre of Egyptian POWs in the Sinai.
Some Liberty survivors and supporters claim the U.S. government
covered up the incident to avoid a conflict with Israel that could
have cost the Johnson administration support among Jewish voters
and supporters. Subsequent administrations and Congresses have
avoided a thorough airing of the incident for the same reasons,
they say.
But Cristol says there have been 10 U.S. investigations, ranging
from the court of inquiry and the CIA’s report to several
conducted by House and Senate committees.
Five drew no conclusions regarding Israel, according to a list
compiled by Cristol, while others accepted that it was an
accident.
The most recent official look at the incident was in 1991, when
the House Armed Services subcommittee on investigations found no
evidence to support the Liberty survivors’ claim that Israel
attacked the ship deliberately.
REPORTS AND RECOLLECTIONS
The CIA’s report, the earliest of those assembled, held open the
possibility that the attack was a case of mistaken identity — the
finding that the Kidd court went on to make five days later —
though it did not present that as a conclusion.
In the June 13, 1967, report, the CIA stated that "an overzealous
pilot" could have mistaken the Liberty for an Egyptian ship, the
El Quesir. Helms, the former CIA director, declined to discuss the
incident at length.
"I’ve done all I can. I don’t want to spend the rest of my life in
court" testifying about the incident, he said.
Mike Weeks, a naval aviation writer and amateur historian who
studied the official Navy communications that occurred during and
after the attack and believes it was an accident, said there is
more information on the Liberty still classified and believes the
government should release all of it.
"Just put it out there and see how it flows," he said. "The bottom
line, all this stuff ought to be let loose, for heaven’s sake."
------------------
Bryant Jordan is a staff writer for Marine Corps Times.
_________________________________________________________________
_
(·< I'll tell you the truth about the USS LIBERTY, visit
_)W) http://home.cfl.rr.com/gidusko/liberty/
>/^^
You do cryptograms? http://gidusko.tripod.com
_________________________________________________________________ | |  | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |
