| Author | Message | | Von Curtis | | Posted: Sun May 03, 2009 10:24 pm Post subject: Citizens of the World - A Real Peoples' Bailout ! |
| http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/the-americas/2009/05/02/jews-are-disproportionately-involved-every-kind-of-insanity.php
You can be a citizen of the world in thinking and communicating on the internet BUT it doesn't and won't work physically - we need local control of our countries for ourselves and our children's welfare.
Diversity and de-centralization is what we need.
They want the great globalist NWO - open borders in America, Canada , Mexico . Australia , Britain in the name of being multilateralists, universalists multiculturalists ,cosmopolitan citizens of the world , we'll be post - Australians , post- Americans , post British , - they regard the nation-state as old-fashioned and done with.
We'll be little slaves in one big market with happy multinational corporations and big governments telling us where to live and what to think and who and what our enemy is - and we will stay in a permanent state of fear.
Sounds great !!!
http://www.agmates.com/blog/2009/05/02/readers-weekend-forum-2nd-3rd-may-200/comment-page-1/#comment-30669
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/183333-Connecting-the-Dots-A-Pandemic-Distracts-as-the-World-Government-Picks-a-Fight
A UN report released in 1994 "Global Governance for the 21st Century" by the 1969 Nobel Prize for Economics, Jan Tinbergen, which called for a World Government by strengthening the United Nations system, but mostly by creating a World Treasury and a World Central Bank which would be responsible for creating a 'World Financial Policy'.
The essence of the world of politics and economics becomes much easier to understand once we get rid of the traditional labels, catch-phrases, names and 'isms' that usually serve to confuse and create false debates that miss the point. As a starting point, we should try not to worry too much about 'capitalism' vs 'communism', 'states' vs 'corporations', 'national' vs 'international' or the 'public' vs the 'private'. Does it really matter if a certain system of government is called 'socialist' or 'democratic' if in practice, it all comes down to an elite selfishly wielding a disproportional amount of economic and political power over everyone else? Does it matter if Republicans or Democrats are in the White House if, in spite of their different rhetoric, the result of the majority of their actions is essentially the same? Ultimately, the principle element determining the amount of justice, liberty and equality the population enjoys is the human and moral quality of those who hold the real positions of authority. Only once this is understood, we can get on with the details of how it happens, and how relevant the 'isms' really are.
The elite that has been historically concentrating global power in their hands is far from interested in becoming the servants of the people that they should be. On the contrary, evidence shows that they work first and mostly for their self-interest without regard for anyone else, which means that the rest of us pay the price one way or another.
International bankers control and manipulate the money system of a nation while letting it appear to be controlled by the government.
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/africa-and-australasia/2009/04/22/imf-wishes-to-sink-australia.php
The Top Ten Fat Cats Of 2008
http://whatreallyhappened.com/content/top-ten-fat-cats-2008#comments
These figures likely pale against those of the private banksters
AnnT
These figures likely pale against those of the private banksters....who remain behind the scenes and hide the accumulation of their wealth. Now, if someone could perform some investigative journalism into the private bankster's annual earnings and wealth...that would be an sight to see.
But these handsome CEO salaries keep these lackeys in line, serving the interests, directly or indirectly, of the private bankers.
------
http://whatreallyhappened.com/content/information-underground-interviews-cynthia-mckinney-blows-lid-israel-lobby-0#comments
'Our unconstitutional monetary system, that allows private bankers to undeservedly (to put it mildly) accumulate HUGE wealth and power through interest, is the number ONE problem of the US and the world!
Green Party Presidential Candidate Cynthia McKinney: A Real Peoples' Bailout
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_14859.cfm
Point 13 out of 14:
13. Nationalization of the Federal Reserve and the establishment of a federally-owned, public banking system that makes credit available for small businesses, homeowners, manufacturing operations, renewable energy and infrastructure investments; and ...' | |  | | Cowboy | | Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 5:35 pm Post subject: |
| | Quote: |
13. Nationalization of the Federal Reserve and the establishment of a federally-owned, public banking system that makes credit available for small businesses, homeowners, manufacturing operations, renewable energy and infrastructure investments; and ...' |
Yeah...
Put the money supply directly in the hands of politicians who need to get reelected every 2 years....
Stupid idea. | | | | | ©2002-2009 WarWithoutEnd.co.uk |
